| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Williams
|
Professional support staff |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Williams
|
Logistical |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Judge (implied)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge
|
Authority instruction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge (unnamed)
|
Professional judicial instruction |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Jury deliberation | The jury is conducting deliberations. They requested to end at 5:00 p.m. and resume the next day ... | jury room | View |
| N/A | Trial | A legal trial during which these instructions are given to the jury. The document outlines the ru... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Jury deliberation | The jury deliberation is scheduled to resume on the upcoming Monday at 9:00 a.m. | the courthouse | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | The trial is scheduled to resume on Thursday at 9:30 AM with the defense phase of the case. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Trial resumption | The trial is scheduled to resume at 9:00 a.m. on the upcoming Monday, following a long weekend. | courthouse | View |
| N/A | Jury deliberation | Jury deliberations to continue with a schedule of 9:00 a.m. to at least 6:00 p.m., with an option... | jury room | View |
| N/A | Jury deliberation | The process by which the jury is instructed to weigh evidence, discuss opinions amongst themselve... | jury room | View |
| N/A | Jury deliberation | The jury is instructed to retire to the jury room to deliberate on the case. | Jury room | View |
| N/A | Court instruction | The judge addressed the jury to confirm their schedule and remind them of COVID-19 safety protoco... | main courthouse | View |
| 2022-12-27 | Trial | A planned trial date for the week of New Year's. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-12-20 | Trial | A planned trial date for the week of Christmas. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-11 | Jury deliberation | Jury deliberations to resume at 9:00 a.m. | jury room | View |
| 2022-08-11 | Jury deliberation | Jury to resume deliberations at 9 a.m. and is encouraged to plan to deliberate until at least 6 p... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Jury deliberation | Jury deliberations to end at 5:00 p.m. as requested by the jury. | jury room | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court session / jury dismissal | The Court dismissed the jury for the day, acknowledging their note to finish at 5 p.m., and provi... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Direct examination of the government's first witness, Lawrence Visoski, begins. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court recess | The court took a 15-minute afternoon break during a trial. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A mid-afternoon break is called during the cross-examination of witness Rodgers. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A recross-examination of a witness named Carolyn regarding $446,000 she received in 2009. After t... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Cross-examination | Ms. Sternheim cross-examines the witness, Kate, in court. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A witness, Meder, is questioned under direct examination about evidence (an image from a CD) rela... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The end of a day's court session where the judge provides instructions to the jury. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness A. Farmer regarding the November 2006 interview. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A court session was adjourned for the day because an attorney involved in the case became ill and... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court recess | The court proceeding broke for a one-hour lunch break. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Parkinson. The witness identifies various locations on a property, including a cabana, storage building, and barracks, while narrating a walk-through video being shown as evidence. The transcript concludes with the attorney, Ms. Comey, ending the video presentation and the judge providing instructions to the jury.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Parkinson by Ms. Comey regarding a photograph of a work area containing cookbooks and notes. The witness identifies the name 'Jeffrey E. Epstein' written in the photograph before the proceedings are halted by the Judge for a lunch break.
This document is a court transcript from a case dated August 10, 2022, detailing a direct examination of a witness named Alessi. The transcript captures a discussion between the judge (THE COURT) and attorneys (Ms. Comey, Mr. Pagliuca) about the witness having compared Government Exhibits 52A and 52 before taking the stand. Ms. Comey describes this as 'homework' to confirm the documents were copies, a practice the judge acknowledges.
This document is a page of concluding remarks from a judge to a jury in the criminal case against Ms. Maxwell, filed on December 18, 2021. The judge instructs the jurors on their duty to deliberate based solely on the evidence and the law, to disregard sympathy, and to engage in a fair and collaborative discussion to reach a verdict. The instructions emphasize that each juror's final vote must reflect their own conscientious belief.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details a portion of the direct examination of witness Mrs. Hesse by attorney Ms. Moe. During the examination, Government Exhibits 1, 2, and 3 are admitted into evidence under seal by the judge, despite an objection from attorney Mr. Pagliuca being overruled.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The page captures the moment the judge announces a 15-minute afternoon break to the jury, following the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The transcript was produced by Southern District Reporters, P.C.
This document is page 189 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It documents the conclusion of the redirect examination of a witness named McHugh, who is then excused. The presiding officer subsequently dismisses the jury for a 15-minute afternoon break.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The transcript captures a brief exchange where an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, requests a lunch break during the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The Court grants the request, announcing to the jury a break for 45 minutes to an hour starting at 12:45.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the judge's remarks at the end of the day. The judge dismisses the jury, outlines the daily schedule (9:30 AM to 5:00 PM), and details the specific trial dates for the weeks of Christmas and New Year's in December. The transcript also includes a brief, preceding testimony mentioning a personal assistant named Kimberly.
This document is a page from the court transcript of the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Judge (The Court) informs the jury that the evidence portion of the trial has concluded. The Judge sets the schedule for the following Monday, starting early at 9:00 a.m. for closing arguments and jury instructions, with a potential extension until 6:00 p.m. to finish in one day.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the judge's instructions to the jury after the government has rested its case. The judge dismisses the jury for a five-day break, admonishing them not to discuss the case or consume media about it, and schedules the trial to resume on Thursday morning with the defense's case. After the jury is excused, defense counsel Mr. Everdell begins to address the court.
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details instructions from THE COURT to the jury regarding their deliberation schedule and adherence to COVID-19 protocols. The court grants the jury's request to end deliberations at 5:00 p.m. today and resume at 9:00 a.m. tomorrow, maintaining a general schedule of 9:00 a.m. to at least 6:00 p.m. It emphasizes strict mask-wearing (KN95/N95), social distancing, and offers transportation assistance via Ms. Williams.
This court transcript, filed on August 10, 2022, documents a judge addressing the jury before a long weekend. The judge acknowledges the jury's decision not to deliberate the next day, instructs them to resume on Monday at 9:00 a.m., and warns them of new, stricter COVID-19 mask requirements that will be implemented in the courthouse. The judge concludes by emphatically reminding the jurors of their duty not to discuss the case with anyone outside of formal deliberations.
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It details the beginning of a trial session where the defense attorney, Mr. Everdell, calls his first witness, Cimberly Espinosa. The witness is sworn in, identifies herself for the record, and prepares to undergo direct examination.
This document is a court transcript from a criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The judge informs the jury that the government has rested its case and provides strict instructions for them to avoid any media or discussion about the case during a five-day recess. After the jury is excused, a defense attorney, Mr. Everdell, begins to address the court.
This document is page 12 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The judge thanks and discharges the jury, acknowledging their service during the pandemic. Following the jury's dismissal, the court and counsel (Mr. Everdell and Ms. Sternheim) discuss post-verdict logistics, including a briefing schedule and the presentence report, concluding with Ms. Sternheim requesting a court order for Ms. Maxwell to receive a COVID-19 booster shot.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which the judge addresses the jury. The judge confirms the jury's requested deliberation schedule to end at 5 p.m. and resume the next morning, while also outlining future scheduling. The judge strongly reminds the jury of strict COVID-19 protocols, including mandatory KN95/N95 masking and social distancing, due to the omicron variant.
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing instructions from "THE COURT" to the jury. The Court dismisses the jury for the day, advises them to continue taking health precautions, and outlines the schedule for resuming deliberations the following day, suggesting they plan to deliberate until at least 6 p.m. The Court also designates Ms. Williams as a contact for any hardships regarding the deliberation schedule, emphasizing that the jury should take all the time they need.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which a judge addresses the jury. The judge acknowledges the jury's decision to postpone deliberations until the following Monday and provides instructions for when they resume. The judge also warns the jury about a COVID variant, announces new mandatory mask requirements for the courthouse, and reiterates the critical rule that they must not discuss the case with anyone outside of deliberations.
This document is a jury charge from a legal proceeding, specifically Instruction No. 2 regarding the role of the jury. The judge instructs the jury that they are the exclusive judges of the facts and must base their verdict solely on the evidence presented, while also being bound to follow the law exactly as the judge provides it. The document clarifies that statements, arguments, and questions from lawyers do not constitute evidence.
This document is page 98 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the end of a trial day where witness Visoski briefly mentions a personal assistant named Kimberly before the Judge interrupts proceedings at 4:59 PM. The remainder of the page consists of the Judge instructing the jury on the daily schedule (9:30 AM start) and the holiday sitting schedule for late December.
This document is a transcript page from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It depicts the moment the judge thanks and discharges the jury following the verdict. Defense counsel Ms. Sternheim requests the court wait on the presentence report and explicitly asks for a court order to ensure Ms. Maxwell receives a COVID-19 booster shot.
This document is page 7 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The text captures the beginning of the closing arguments phase, where the Judge outlines the schedule: Ms. Moe will present for the government, followed by a lunch break, and then Ms. Menninger will present for the defense. The page concludes with the Judge introducing Ms. Moe to the jury.
This document is page 80 of a court filing (Document 565) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 19, 2021. It contains the concluding remarks and jury instructions for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically instructing jurors on the standard of proof (reasonable doubt), the necessity of ignoring sympathy, and the conduct expected during deliberations. The text emphasizes that the burden of proof lies with the Government.
This document is a legal instruction, specifically "Instruction No. 2: Role of the Jury," from a trial filed on December 19, 2021. The judge outlines the jury's responsibilities as the exclusive finders of fact, who must weigh evidence, determine witness credibility, and make decisions based solely on the evidence presented. The instruction explicitly distinguishes what constitutes evidence (witness answers, exhibits, stipulations) from what does not (lawyers' statements, questions, and the judge's own comments or rulings).
The jury sent a note to the judge declining the offer to deliberate on the day following the court session.
The jury sent a note to the judge indicating they would like to end deliberations for the day at 5:00 p.m. and resume the next day at 9:00 a.m.
The jury sent a note to the court declining the invitation to deliberate on the following day ('tomorrow').
The judge requested that the jury let them know by note if they agree to stay later than 6:00 p.m. on any given day.
Instructions regarding daily start times (9:30 AM), arrival times, and the holiday schedule for Christmas and New Year's weeks.
The judge instructs the jury that deliberations will resume on Monday at 9:00 a.m., warns them about a COVID variant, announces new mask protocols for the courthouse, and reminds them not to discuss the case.
Ms. Sternheim begins her opening statement for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, by arguing that women are often unfairly blamed for men's actions and that Maxwell is not Jeffrey Epstein, despite the charges relating to his conduct.
Instructions regarding the jury's schedule for deliberations, including ending today at 5:00 p.m. and resuming tomorrow at 9:00 a.m., and strict adherence to COVID-19 protocols such as mask-wearing (KN95/N95), social distancing, and brief mask removal only for eating/drinking.
Ms. Pomerantz instructs the jury to pay attention to evidence, follow the judge's instructions, and use common sense to reach a guilty verdict for Ghislaine Maxwell.
Instructions regarding the jury's schedule for deliberations, including ending today at 5:00 p.m. and resuming tomorrow at 9:00 a.m., and strict adherence to COVID-19 protocols such as mask-wearing (KN95/N95), social distancing, and brief mask removal only for eating/drinking.
The judge instructs the jury that the trial will resume on Monday at 9:00 a.m., informs them of new mask protocols, and reminds them not to discuss the case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity