Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00020602.jpg
This is a Motion Information Statement filed on January 12, 2023, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 22-1426). Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, John M. Leventhal, is requesting an unopposed extension of time to file her appellate brief, moving the deadline from January 30, 2023, to February 28, 2023, citing unforeseen circumstances.
DOJ-OGR-00020595.jpg
This legal document, dated July 15, 2022, is a notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case of "United States of America v. Maxwell" (Docket # 22-1426). The notice states that the case manager assigned to the matter has been changed. It provides a phone number for any inquiries related to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00020582.jpg
This is a Motion Information Statement filed on July 15, 2022, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case USA v. Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim, on behalf of her client Ghislaine Maxwell, is formally requesting to be relieved from her duties as continued counsel for the appeal. The opposing party is the United States, represented by AUSAs from the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00020555.jpg
This document is a court docket from November 24, 2021, for the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It lists several filings, including letters regarding protective orders, an order for the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program to produce documents, and a motion by the prosecution to preclude the expert testimony of Dr. Ryan Hall, along with the defense's response. The docket also confirms the trial's start date of November 29, 2021, and outlines COVID-19 protocols for courthouse entry.
DOJ-OGR-00020549.jpg
This document is a court docket entry log from Case 22-1426 in the Southern District of New York, dated July 8, 2022, detailing events from November 15, 2021, related to defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. It records an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding courtroom access, the filing of transcripts from prior conferences, a letter from Maxwell's defense about delayed disclosures, and the minutes from a pretrial conference held that day, listing all attending counsel for both the defense and the government.
DOJ-OGR-00020547.jpg
This legal document, a docket sheet from Case 22-1426 dated July 8, 2022, details several court filings from November 12, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The filings include a memorandum from the USA opposing various defense motions and a reply from Maxwell's team. The document also contains a court order scheduling an in-person proceeding for November 15, 2021, at the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse in New York, specifying the courtroom, overflow rooms for public access, and strict COVID-19 protocols for all attendees.
DOJ-OGR-00020544.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell* (dated November 9, 2021). It contains orders from Judge Alison Nathan regarding the logistics of *voir dire* (jury selection), including the use of pseudonyms for witnesses, and schedules a sealed *in camera* hearing regarding Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (sexual behavior evidence). Additionally, it logs letters from the defense regarding bond release and from the prosecution regarding victim notification.
DOJ-OGR-00020541.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from early November 2021. It records joint letters regarding trial length and evidence motions, motions for reconsideration filed by the defense, and significant court orders regarding hearing schedules, witness testimony, defendant transportation, and access to legal mail.
DOJ-OGR-00020538.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from October 27 to October 29, 2021. It details numerous 'motions in limine' filed by Maxwell's defense team (Pagliuca, Everdell) attempting to exclude specific evidence, including items seized from Epstein's Palm Beach home (358 El Brillo Way) in 2005, evidence related to 'Accuser-3', and an alleged flight. The document also records an order from Judge Nathan scheduling an in-person pretrial conference for November 1, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020454.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing a series of court filings and orders entered on November 24, 2021. Key events include orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding trial procedures and COVID-19 protocols, the production of materials from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, and motions filed by the prosecution (USA) to preclude the expert testimony of Dr. Ryan Hall. The filings demonstrate active pre-trial legal maneuvering by both the prosecution and the defense just before the trial's scheduled start on November 29, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020448.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426) regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It details entries from November 15, 2021, including logistics for public/press access to the courtroom, the filing of transcripts for previous conferences, and a dispute regarding the late receipt of government disclosures at the MDC. It concludes with a minute entry for a pretrial conference where Maxwell was present with her defense team and the government prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00020446.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426, referencing SDNY Case 20-cr-330) dated November 12, 2021, detailing proceedings in the case USA vs. Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists filings related to various Motions in Limine regarding the exclusion of evidence (including items from a 2005 search of 358 El Brillo Way), suppression of identification, and expert testimony. It also contains a court order establishing protocols for an in-person proceeding on November 15, 2021, including COVID-19 measures and provisions for public and victim access via overflow rooms.
DOJ-OGR-00020444.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings on November 10 and 11, 2021. It details the scheduling of voir dire, COVID-19 courtroom protocols, and rulings on motions in limine, including the denial of a defense motion to exclude expert testimony on grooming. It also lists the attorneys present for both the prosecution and defense during a pretrial conference.
DOJ-OGR-00020443.jpg
This document contains a court docket log from November 9, 2021, related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426 on appeal). It details orders signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding jury selection (voir dire) questions, the use of pseudonyms for witnesses, and preparations for an in-person hearing on November 10 regarding Rule 412 (victim privacy evidence). It also notes correspondence from defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim regarding bond release and from prosecutors regarding victim notification.
DOJ-OGR-00020440.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), covering entries from November 2 to November 4, 2021. It details pre-trial motions regarding trial length, juror anonymity, release on bond, and evidentiary hearings (Rule 412 and Daubert). Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders scheduling a hearing for November 10, 2021, and directed the government to address issues regarding Maxwell's transportation and access to legal mail at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00021875.jpg
This document is a blank court form titled 'Verified Itemized Bill of Costs' from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated September 17, 2024. It relates to the appeal case 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Docket #: 22-1426cr), referencing the original District Court case presided over by Judge Nathan in the SDNY. The form is intended for counsel to submit costs pursuant to FRAP 39(c), though the specific fields for amounts and signatures are unfilled in this copy.
DOJ-OGR-00021874.jpg
This document is a procedural instruction sheet from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the filing of a 'Bill of Costs' in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket 22-1426cr). Dated September 17, 2024, it outlines the specific requirements under FRAP 39 for recovering costs, such as printing fees, following a judgment. The document lists Chief Judge Debra Ann Livingston and Clerk Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe.
DOJ-OGR-00021822.jpg
This document is a blank 'Verified Itemized Bill of Costs' form filed on September 17, 2024, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Docket # 22-1426cr). The form is intended for a party to request the Clerk of Court to prepare an itemized statement of costs, such as docketing and printing fees, to be taxed against the opposing party.
DOJ-OGR-00021821.jpg
This document, issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on September 17, 2024, provides detailed instructions for filing a bill of costs in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket # 22-1426cr). It outlines the procedural requirements under FRAP 39, including a 14-day filing deadline after judgment, verification, service on adversaries, and specific rules regarding allowable charges and documentation for printing costs.
DOJ-OGR-00021790.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to the Clerk of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter cites the precedent set in United States v. Watkins to argue that the Bail Reform Act permits a court to conduct a fact-based, "conduct-specific inquiry" for felonies involving a minor victim, rather than being limited to the legal elements of the charge. This submission is intended to provide supplemental authority to the court concerning the upcoming argument in Maxwell's case.
DOJ-OGR-00021788.jpg
This document is a Revised Notice of Hearing Date from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket # 22-1426cr). The notice, dated February 29, 2024, schedules oral arguments for Tuesday, March 12, 2024, at 2:00 p.m. at the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse in New York City, allotting 10 minutes per side for arguments.
DOJ-OGR-00021786.jpg
This is a Revised Notice of Hearing Date from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Docket # 22-1426cr). The document schedules an oral argument for Tuesday, March 12, 2024, at 2:00 p.m. at the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse in New York City, allotting 10 minutes per side. It provides instructions for counsel regarding registration, remote participation options, and withdrawal motions.
DOJ-OGR-00021782.jpg
This is a 'Notice of Hearing Date' from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the appeal case 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Docket # 22-1426cr). The document schedules oral arguments for Tuesday, March 12, 2024, at 10:00 am at the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse in New York City, allotting 10 minutes per side. It provides instructions regarding in-person vs. remote attendance, health protocols, and procedures for withdrawing motions.
DOJ-OGR-00021779.jpg
This document is a Notice of Hearing Date from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket 22-1426cr). It schedules oral arguments for Tuesday, March 12, 2024, at 10:00 am at the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse in New York City. The notice outlines procedural rules regarding attendance, time allotment (10 minutes per side), and protocols for motions to withdraw.
DOJ-OGR-00021778.jpg
This is a legal notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated December 11, 2023, regarding the case of 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Docket # 22-1426cr). The document formally announces that the case manager assigned to this legal matter has been changed. It provides a phone number for any inquiries related to the case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity