JUROR
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Judge
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Fellow Juror
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Anyone outside the jury
|
Prohibited contact |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Family or close friend
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Staff of the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Fed
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Personnel of the New York City Police Department (NYPD)
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The voir dire process, during which jurors are questioned to determine their suitability for a jury. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | Stages of a legal trial where a defendant's innocence is presumed and the government must prove g... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Crime | A friend of Juror B was coerced and sexually abused by a professor. This was reported by Juror B ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Criminal case | A legal proceeding where a defendant is tried, involving a jury, judge, and government prosecution. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Medical event | A juror suffered an illness or health condition. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The process of questioning prospective jurors, during which a juror in the Sampson case and Juror... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A trial for participation in a heroin distribution conspiracy where a juror failed to disclose th... | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Court proceeding | A court questioning a potential juror about their prior knowledge of Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein ... | court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00008545.jpg
This document is page 7 of a 167-page legal filing (Document 563) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 18, 2021. It is a table of contents for a set of jury instructions, listing topics from Instruction No. 42 to No. 59, which cover evidence, witness credibility, defendant's rights, and jury conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00009102.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal case, filed on February 24, 2022, detailing the questioning of a potential juror. The court probes the juror's prior knowledge of Ms. Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, which the juror states came from a CNN news broadcast after Epstein's death. The juror affirms their ability to disregard this information and judge the case solely on the evidence presented in court.
DOJ-OGR-00017360.jpg
This document is a court transcript page dated August 10, 2022, detailing the conclusion of a trial. The judge confirms a unanimous verdict with two individual jurors, then addresses the counsel before formally dismissing the entire jury. The judge provides the jury with specific instructions regarding their freedom to discuss the case while also mandating confidentiality about the deliberation process, the identities of other jurors, and any information under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00017267.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a judge's instructions to a jury in the criminal case against Ms. Maxwell. The judge outlines the procedures for deliberation, including the election of a foreperson, the method for communicating with the court via written notes, and the process for requesting testimony. Crucially, the judge explicitly instructs the jury not to consider punishment in their deliberations, focusing solely on the evidence to determine guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
DOJ-OGR-00010025.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal proceeding, likely a deposition or court transcript, featuring a direct examination by 'Brune' of a speaker identified as 'C2GFDAU1'. The discussion revolves around a past court event where a judge had to restart jury deliberations due to a juror's illness, which coincided with Mr. Rosenbaum having to leave. The witness explains why they did not raise a particular issue with the Court at an earlier time.
DOJ-OGR-00005348.jpg
This document is page 26 of a juror questionnaire for federal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. It contains questions designed to identify potential conflicts of interest or bias by asking a prospective juror about their associations with law enforcement and legal entities. Specifically, it inquires about connections to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, the FBI, and the NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00005302.jpg
This document is a blank juror questionnaire from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. The questions are designed to screen potential jurors for bias by asking about their personal experiences, or those of their friends and family, with accusations of sexual harassment, abuse, or assault. The form is unanswered.
DOJ-OGR-00005300.jpg
This document is page 24 of a juror questionnaire from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. The questions are designed to identify potential biases a juror might have regarding laws and organizations related to sex trafficking, sex crimes, and sexual harassment. It also probes the juror's ability to fairly assess the credibility of law enforcement witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00005289.jpg
This document is page 13 of a juror questionnaire for the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. It contains questions for a prospective juror regarding their personal or their friends'/family's experiences with being subpoenaed, arrested, or charged with a crime. The purpose is to determine if these experiences would prevent them from acting as a fair and impartial juror.
Use of notes during deliberation
The judge instructs jurors who took notes not to show or discuss them with other jurors, as the notes are for personal assistance only and do not carry more weight than other jurors' recollections.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity