MAURENE COMEY
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Co counsel prosecution |
15
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor defendant |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Professional |
11
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
18 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
location
USA
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
location
USA
|
Prosecutor |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Professional hierarchical |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor defendant |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
USA
|
Prosecutor government |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
USA
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Subordinate superior |
7
|
3 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional adversarial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Prosecutor judge |
7
|
3 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Meeting | The Government conferred with defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell regarding a request to delay ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2023-06-30 | Legal filing | Filing of an Oral Argument Statement in case 22-1426, indicating a conditional desire for oral ar... | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE... | View |
| 2023-06-29 | N/A | Submission of legal filing concluding that the judgment of conviction should be affirmed. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-08-22 | N/A | Sentencing Hearing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal document service | Bobbi C. Sternheim certified the service of a legal motion with an exhibit to multiple parties in... | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-26 | Court filing | The Government submitted a motion filed by Kate's attorney. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | Legal filing | The U.S. Government filed its sentencing memorandum in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Filing of Government's sentencing recommendation conclusion. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal document service | Christian R. Everdell served a memorandum via ECF upon four individuals. | N/A | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 661 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 660 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-04-01 | Legal filing | Document 650 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-04-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 652 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-15 | N/A | Filing of Government's opposition to defendant's motion for a new trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court hearing | A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... | Court (unspecified) | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-03-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 635 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-25 | N/A | Filing of Government's response to defendant's post-trial motions | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 617 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-16 | Court filing | Document 603 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000891.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from December 2020 in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details correspondence regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC and a denied request for an in camera conference regarding a renewed bail motion. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders balancing privacy interests with public access, ultimately allowing tailored redactions to defense letters but denying the request to keep proceedings entirely sealed or in camera.
DOJ-OGR-00000890.jpg
This document is a page from a federal court docket in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, listing entries from November 6, 2020, to December 1, 2020. It details various filings including letters regarding discovery deadlines, affidavits, mandates from the USCA dismissing an appeal, and several memo endorsements and orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding discovery schedules and conditions of confinement.
DOJ-OGR-00000889.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing legal filings from September to November 2020. It chronicles a series of letters, motions, and orders between the prosecution (USA, represented by AUSAs Comey, Moe, and Pomerantz) and the defense (Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by attorneys including Sternheim, Everdell, and Pagliuca), all overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The filings primarily concern procedural matters such as requests to delay disclosure of evidence, modify protective orders, and confirm the government's disclosure obligations.
DOJ-OGR-00000888.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-770) listing filings and orders between August 18, 2020, and September 8, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records legal maneuvers including attorney appearances, sealed documents, letter motions regarding redactions and protective orders, and a Memorandum Opinion denying defense requests for victim identities and changes to confinement conditions. The page concludes with a notice of appeal filed by Maxwell regarding a previous memorandum and opinion.
DOJ-OGR-00000885.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for Case 21-770 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) covering proceedings from July 13, 2020, to July 27, 2020. Key events include Maxwell's arraignment where she pleaded Not Guilty, the denial of her bail, the setting of a trial date for July 12, 2021, and various orders regarding discovery scheduling and extrajudicial statements. The document records the presence of defense attorneys Mark Cohen, Jeffrey Pagliuca, and Christian Everdell, as well as government prosecutors Alison Moe, Alex Rossmiller, and Maurene Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00000862.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from March 2021 covering the denial of Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for bail and her subsequent appeal of that decision. It also details a legal dispute regarding a defense subpoena targeting a law firm representing alleged victims, with Judge Nathan ordering the firm to formally file objections to protect victim privacy under Rule 17(c)(3). The document lists various filings including letters from prosecutors (AUSAs) and defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00000861.jpg
This document is a docket summary from the legal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing court filings and orders from late February to mid-March 2021. Key events include Maxwell's third motion for bond, subsequent responses and replies, and a motion for a time extension which was granted. The document culminates in a detailed order from Judge Alison J. Nathan on March 18, 2021, addressing disputes over the redaction and sealing of pretrial motions and exhibits, setting deadlines for the parties to confer and propose joint redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00000860.jpg
This document is a court docket log from February 2021 for Case 21-770 involving Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the filing of numerous defense motions including attempts to suppress evidence, dismiss counts based on time-bars and a non-prosecution agreement, and strike surplusage. The log also records the filing of sealed documents and correspondence between attorneys (both defense and prosecution) and Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00000859.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the case US v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-770), covering entries from January 26, 2021, to February 4, 2021. It details various legal filings, including government letters regarding laptop access at MDC Brooklyn, a denial of a BOP request to vacate an order, and multiple defense motions to suppress evidence and dismiss specific counts of the indictment. The document highlights the active legal maneuvering regarding redactions, detention conditions, and pre-trial dismissal attempts.
DOJ-OGR-00000857.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-770), covering late December 2020 to mid-January 2021. It details the denial of Maxwell's renewed motion for bail due to flight risk, referencing charges related to the enticement and transportation of minors for illegal sex acts. The document tracks subsequent procedural filings, including sealed documents and Maxwell's eventual filing of a Notice of Appeal on January 11, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00000856.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from December 2020 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records the filing of opposition and reply memoranda regarding Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, as well as Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders approving redactions to protect third-party privacy and ultimately denying the motion for release on bail on December 28, 2020. The text heavily cites legal precedents regarding judicial transparency versus privacy interests (Lugosch, Amodeo).
DOJ-OGR-00000853.jpg
This is a court docket sheet from December 2020 (entries 78-84) detailing proceedings in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records correspondence regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC and legal arguments concerning the sealing and redaction of defense letters. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders requiring MDC counsel to submit information, approved specific redactions based on privacy interests, denied a request for an in-camera conference, and ordered three documents to be placed in a sealed vault.
DOJ-OGR-00000852.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from late 2020 detailing procedural updates in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit, extensions of discovery deadlines, and disputes over the disclosure of materials and Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC. Judge Nathan issued orders requiring the parties to confer regarding Maxwell's request for Warden Heriberto Tellez to address her detention concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00000850.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-770) covering proceedings in August and September 2020. It details several legal motions, including the defense's failed attempts to compel the disclosure of victim identities, modify protective orders to use discovery in civil cases, and move Maxwell to the general prison population. The log concludes with Maxwell filing a Notice of Appeal regarding the denial of the protective order modification.
DOJ-OGR-00000847.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing proceedings from July 13, 2020, to July 27, 2020. It records various court orders, including the granting of a detention motion, an arraignment where Maxwell pleaded not guilty, scheduling for discovery and trial, and rulings on motions regarding extrajudicial statements. Key participants include Judge Alison J. Nathan, the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, and various attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00000840.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appeal filed on March 24, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The appeal challenges a court order from March 22, 2021, which denied her 'Third Motion for Release on Bail'. The document identifies Maxwell's attorney, David Oscar Markus, and the prosecuting Assistant U.S. Attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00000826.jpg
This legal document, dated July 24, 2019, is a Notice of Appearance filed by Maurene Comey in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (Docket No. 19-2221). Comey, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, is entering her appearance as additional counsel for the United States, joining her colleague Sarah K. Eddy on the prosecution team.
DOJ-OGR-00000728.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal document filed on September 4, 2019, in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (United States v. Epstein). Judge Richard M. Berman addresses an unnamed recipient regarding an opinion piece they wrote, criticizing it for potentially discouraging Ms. Giuffre and her attorney David Boies from speaking at an August 27, 2019 hearing. The document copies attorneys Maurene Comey, Martin Weinberg, Reid Weingarten, and David Boies.
DOJ-OGR-00000726.jpg
Fordham law professor Bruce A. Green writes to Judge Richard M. Berman to correct a misunderstanding from an August 27, 2019, hearing in the case *United States v. Epstein*. Green clarifies that, contrary to the court's apparent understanding, he has never served as counsel for Epstein or his estate. He explains that his only involvement in a related matter was serving as an expert witness for Professor Dershowitz in a separate defamation case, a role that concluded in June 2019 and did not involve representation or advocacy.
DOJ-OGR-00000638.jpg
This legal document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on August 29, 2019, which formally dismisses the criminal case against defendant Jeffrey Epstein. The order, signed by Judge Richard M. Berman, follows a recommendation and directive from the U.S. Attorney's office to file a nolle prosequi. The judge's order also references a hearing held on August 27, 2019, and the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
DOJ-OGR-00000629.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 19, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, is an order of nolle prosequi for the case against defendant Jeffrey Epstein. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Alison Moe, Alex Rossmiller, and Maurene Comey recommend dropping the charges, and U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman directs the filing, which is then ordered by Judge Richard M. Berman. This action formally terminates the criminal prosecution against Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00000624.jpg
This document is the second page of a letter dated August 14, 2019, from Lamine N’Diaye, the Warden of MCC New York, to the Court. The Warden states that the facility will provide an update on the official cause of death for an individual (implied to be Mr. Epstein) as soon as the autopsy is complete. The letter copies several U.S. government officials, including Marshals and Attorneys, as well as two individuals identified as counsel for Mr. Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00000603.jpg
This document is the signature page of a court order from the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (1:19-cr-00490-RMB), filed on July 25, 2019. The order was signed by Judge Richard M. Berman of the Southern District of New York. It shows consent from both the prosecution, represented by U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman, and the defense, represented by attorneys Martin Weinberg and Reid Weingarten on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00000594.jpg
This document is the signature page of a court order from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, filed on July 25, 2019. It shows the agreement and consent of both the U.S. Government, represented by U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman's office, and the defense, represented by counsel for Jeffrey Epstein. The order was issued by Judge Richard M. Berman of the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00000585.jpg
This document is a letter dated July 25, 2019, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (specifically Assistant US Attorney Alison Moe) to Judge Richard M. Berman. The prosecution requests the Court to endorse a proposed protective order in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, noting that defense counsel (Martin Weinberg and Reid Weingarten) have consented to the order.
Opposition to motion
Maurene Comey informed Christian R. Everdell that the Government does not oppose the motion for Cohen & Gresser to be relieved as counsel.
Proposed Redactions Document filed by USA
Regarding proposed redactions.
Proposed Redactions
Letter regarding proposed redactions document filed by USA.
Cover Letter for Government Opposition to Defense Pretria...
Cover letter regarding opposition documents.
Notification of Motion
Movant notified opposing counsel as required by Local Rule 27.1
Notice of Appearance
Formal notice that Maurene Comey is entering the case as additional counsel for the United States/Appellee.
Opposition to Defendant's Letter Motion
Response in opposition to Maxwell's motion.
Opposition to Modification
Government opposition to modifying protective order, arguing it is an attempt to use criminal discovery in civil litigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity