United States Attorneys
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial prosecutor defendant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial defendant vs prosecution |
1
|
1 |
EFTA00038967.pdf
This document is a 2022 Director's Awards Non-USAO Supervisor Concurrence Form originating from the Department of Justice. It records the concurrence of an FBI Assistant Special Agent in Charge (ASAC) with the nomination of a team comprising a Special Agent, Task Force Officer, Staff Operations Specialist, and Victim Specialist for a United States Attorneys Offices' award. The specific names of all individuals involved are redacted.
EFTA00032622.pdf
A United States Attorneys request form (USA-47) dated August 30, 2021, authorizing $63,000.00 for jury consulting services from Taylor Trial Consulting for the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The form originates from the U.S. Attorney's Office, SDNY.
EFTA00029020.pdf
This document is an internal DOJ/US Attorney's Office email chain from June 2021 discussing a data security incident ('spill') related to the Ghislaine Maxwell prosecution. A contractor (employed by CACI) improperly uploaded 5.5 GB of discovery material, which included under-age victim names and other PII from the Jeffrey Epstein case, to Sharefile.com instead of the secure USAfx system. The correspondence confirms the data contained sensitive victim information, discusses the lack of disciplinary action for one individual, and notes that a involved contractor was leaving CACI for unrelated reasons.
DOJ-OGR-00000060.tif
This document excerpt discusses legal interpretations regarding a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) and the jurisdiction of United States Attorneys. It criticizes the Second Circuit's reliance on a selective reading of legal texts and highlights that the NPA was intended to resolve Epstein's state and federal criminal liability broadly, serving the interests of the United States and the State of Florida, not just a specific district.
DOJ-OGR-00015246.tif
This document is a list of academic institutions, legal associations, and other organizations, along with events, grouped by year from 1974 to 1980. It appears to be a chronological record of affiliations, seminars, and conferences, potentially related to a professional's career or an institution's activities. The document also includes page numbering and a document identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00015246'.
DOJ-OGR-00023090.tif
This document details discussions and drafts surrounding a non-prosecution agreement for Epstein, focusing on victim compensation and the requirement for Epstein to register as a sex offender. It mentions key individuals like Acosta, Menchel, and Villafaña, and highlights changes made to Villafaña's initial draft before presentation to defense counsel. The text also references relevant legal statutes concerning civil remedies for victims of certain crimes and a memorandum from Acting Deputy Attorney General Craig S. Morford.
DOJ-OGR-00000659.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) filed on September 3, 2019. Epstein's defense counsel argues to the judge that Epstein's suicide on August 10 was 'implausible' given the pending legal motions scheduled for August 12, including a bail appeal and document production requests. The counsel also asserts that the initial autopsy findings on August 11 were inconclusive and reiterates the defense stance that the New York prosecution violated the Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).
DOJ-OGR-00000629.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 19, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, is an order of nolle prosequi for the case against defendant Jeffrey Epstein. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Alison Moe, Alex Rossmiller, and Maurene Comey recommend dropping the charges, and U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman directs the filing, which is then ordered by Judge Richard M. Berman. This action formally terminates the criminal prosecution against Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00000004.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing dated September 17, 2024, concerning the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell. It identifies the legal counsel for both the prosecution (Appellee) and the defense (Appellant), and summarizes that Maxwell is appealing her June 29, 2022, conviction and sentencing by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on charges including conspiracy and sex trafficking of a minor.
DOJ-OGR-00020763.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 16, 2021, argues that a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) does not bind the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. Citing Second Circuit precedent, particularly United States v. Annabi, the filing asserts that such agreements are limited to the district in which they are made unless they explicitly state a broader scope. The document refutes an opposing argument from an individual named Maxwell, stating the NPA lacks the necessary language to apply to other districts.
DOJ-OGR-00021836.jpg
This legal document, dated November 1, 2024, presents an argument for an en banc review to potentially overrule or limit the 'Annabi' canon of construction for plea agreements. The text discusses the jurisdictional authority of U.S. Attorneys' offices, citing the U.S. Attorneys' Manual and the Judiciary Act of 1789 to argue about the scope of immunity and the government's obligation to be explicit about its limitations. The argument is framed in the context of a past case involving interviews with Epstein's lawyers.
DOJ-OGR-00021203.jpg
This document is an organizational chart for the U.S. Department of Justice, depicting its structure for the period of 2006-2008. It outlines the hierarchy of leadership, starting with the Attorney General, and shows the various divisions, bureaus, and offices that fall under the Deputy Attorney General and Associate Attorney General. The chart provides a comprehensive overview of the department's components and their reporting relationships during that time.
DOJ-OGR-00020381.jpg
This is the conclusion page of a legal document filed on May 27, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. Assistant United States Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach argue that a motion filed by an individual named Maxwell should be denied. The document is electronically signed by Maurene Comey.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017740.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article, attributed to attorney David Schoen, discussing proposed amendments to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rules 18, 20, and 21). The text argues for integrating the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) into these rules, specifically requiring courts and U.S. Attorneys to consider victims' views and objections before transferring cases between districts. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating its inclusion in a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017730.jpg
This page from a legal document argues that prosecutors are best situated to notify crime victims of proceedings due to their working relationship and the victims' lack of familiarity with the legal system. It references the 2000 Attorney General Guidelines requiring notification of specific events and provides extensive footnotes citing state statutes that follow this approach.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021561.jpg
This document is an informational brochure for the Victim Notification System (VNS) provided by the US Department of Justice and associated agencies. It explains how victims of federal crimes can register for and access information regarding their cases, defendant custody status, and court events via a toll-free number or website using a VIN and PIN. The document is stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021561', indicating it is part of a Congressional oversight production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021560.jpg
This document is a generic informational brochure from the U.S. Department of Justice regarding the Victim Notification System (VNS). It outlines what information is available to victims via the internet and call center (such as investigative status, court hearings, and custody status) and provides instructions on how to opt out of notifications. While the content is generic, the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021560' indicates this document was included in the House Oversight Committee's discovery materials, likely related to the Epstein investigation regarding how victims were notified.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity