minor girls
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Victimization exploitation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Abuser victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
|
Abuser victims |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuse trafficking |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's alleged sexual molestation of minor girls on a daily basis for many years, including at... | West Palm Beach mansion | View |
| N/A | Grooming and enticement | The defendant (Maxwell) enticed and groomed multiple minor girls to engage in sex acts with Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Recruiting of minor girls | West Palm Beach mansion | View |
| N/A | N/A | Civil lawsuits filed against Epstein by Edwards and others. | Florida (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sex abuse of minor girls | Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beac... | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | Epstein enticed and recruited minor girls to visit his mansions and engage in sex acts, paying th... | Epstein's mansions | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | Period of alleged sex trafficking conspiracy, recruitment, and abuse. | Manhattan, NY and Palm Beac... | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | Alleged period of sexual exploitation and abuse of minors | New York City and Palm Beac... | View |
| 2001-01-01 | Recruitment and abuse | Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein enticed and recruited minor girls to visit Epstein's Palm B... | Epstein's Palm Beach Residence | View |
| 1999-01-01 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein sexually abused more than 30 minor girls at his mansion in Palm Beach, Florida, a... | Palm Beach, Florida; United... | View |
| 1999-01-01 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein sexually abused more than 30 minor girls, including Petitioners Jane Doe 1 and Ja... | Palm Beach, Florida; United... | View |
| 1999-01-01 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein sexually abused more than 30 minor girls at his mansion in Palm Beach, Florida, a... | Palm Beach, Florida, and ov... | View |
| 1994-01-01 | N/A | Period of alleged sexual exploitation and abuse by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell | Various | View |
| 1994-01-01 | Criminal scheme | A scheme to sexually abuse underage girls at Epstein's properties, in which the defendant (Maxwel... | New York, Florida, and New ... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000805.jpg
This document is page 22 of a court filing (Document 32) from July 18, 2019, in the case United States v. Epstein. The text details the Court's finding that Epstein is a 'flight risk' based on a Pretrial Services Report citing his extensive foreign travel, international ties, unexplained assets, and criminal history. It also outlines the seriousness of the charges against him, specifically the alleged sexual abuse of minors in New York and Palm Beach involving the facilitation by employees and associates.
DOJ-OGR-00000258.jpg
This document is the first page of a sealed indictment (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) filed on July 2, 2019, in the Southern District of New York against Jeffrey Epstein. Count One charges him with Sex Trafficking Conspiracy. The overview details that between 2002 and 2005, Epstein allegedly solicited and recruited dozens of minor girls to his residences in New York and Palm Beach for sex acts, paying them in cash and paying some victims to recruit others.
DOJ-OGR-00002315.jpg
This legal document, filed on January 25, 2021, argues that the indictment against Ms. Maxwell lacks sufficient specificity regarding the alleged crimes and the identities of accusers/victims. It contends that the open-ended time periods and vague descriptions of 'minor girls' or 'victims' in the indictment make it impossible for Ms. Maxwell to prepare an adequate defense or apply the statute of limitations. The document cites legal precedents to support the argument for greater specificity in criminal charges.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013388.jpg
This page from a legal filing (page 19) argues that 'Edwards' is entitled to summary judgment because Jeffrey Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment. The document asserts that adverse inferences must be drawn from Epstein's silence, leading to the conclusion that he was a 'serial molester of children' rather than a victim of improper lawsuits. It cites Florida case law to support the argument that silence in civil cases can be used as evidence against a party.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021948.jpg
This page is a rough draft of a legal deposition transcript, page 125. The dialogue concerns testimony given by witnesses Rodriguez and Alessi regarding Mr. Dershowitz's presence at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach mansion. The witness states that while Rodriguez testified Dershowitz was at the 'scene of the crime' (defined as the sex abuse of minor girls at the mansion), he did not indicate Dershowitz had direct knowledge of what occurred in the bedroom.
Solicitation
Using the telephone to contact minor girls and conspiring with assistants to facilitate child exploitation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity