Jane Doe 1000
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Indyke
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
|
Accuser accused |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim abuser |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Sigrid McCawley
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
David Boies
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Andrew Villacastin
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Accuser alleged victim |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Victim abuser |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Joshua I. Schiller
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
|
Litigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
EST
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
OGR
|
Claimant |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
EST
|
Litigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
|
Plaintiff vs estate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Joshua Schiller
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim alleged abuser |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim perpetrator alleged |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Indyke
|
Plaintiff defendant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Epstein and Maxwell simultaneously sexually assaulted Jane Doe with sex toys in the master bedroom. | 9 East 71st Street, New Yor... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jane Doe met Epstein at his New York City mansion on 71st Street for the first time. | 9 East 71st Street, New Yor... | View |
| 2021-03-30 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance | Court (Docket 21-770) | View |
| 2020-06-26 | N/A | Plaintiff submitted claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program | Epstein Victims' Compensati... | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Proposed stay of action for 60 days to allow participation in Compensation Program | SDNY | View |
| 2020-03-30 | N/A | Deadline for Plaintiff to file response to motion to dismiss | USDC SDNY | View |
| 2020-02-28 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-02-12 | N/A | Judge Lewis J. Liman issued an order denying the request for a pre-motion conference as moot and ... | New York, New York | View |
| 2019-11-20 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance by David Boies | New York, New York | View |
| 2019-11-20 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Anonymously | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-11-18 | N/A | Summons issued by the SDNY Clerk of Court. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-11-14 | N/A | Filing of Civil Cover Sheet for Case 1:19-cv-10577-LJL-DCF | SDNY (Manhattan) | View |
| 1999-01-01 | N/A | Alleged sexual offenses/torts committed by Jeffrey Epstein against Jane Doe 1000. | New York and Florida | View |
| 1999-01-01 | N/A | Period of alleged abuse | Unknown | View |
055.pdf
Scheduling Order issued by U.S. Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman on February 11, 2020, coordinating deadlines for multiple civil lawsuits against the Epstein Estate (Indyke et al.) and Nine East 71st Street. The order establishes deadlines for initial disclosures, document requests, fact discovery (June 10, 2020), and expert discovery (July 31, 2020), and notes ongoing settlement discussions with a status report due by April 30, 2020. The document lists 13 separate civil actions being managed together under this order.
053.pdf
Court order from the Southern District of New York dated January 14, 2020, coordinating pretrial supervision for multiple civil lawsuits filed by women alleging sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Debra Freeman orders the parties to submit a discovery schedule by February 6, 2020, and schedules a joint pretrial conference for February 11, 2020. The document lists thirteen specific cases involving plaintiffs such as Katlyn Doe, Priscilla Doe, and others against Indyke and other Epstein-related entities.
038.pdf
Legal correspondence from Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Debra C. Freeman dated May 8, 2020. The letter requests the denial of Plaintiffs' (Jane Doe 1000, Teresa Helm, Juliette Bryant) request for a pre-motion conference regarding discovery disputes, characterizing the Plaintiffs' actions as premature and a violation of court rules regarding meet-and-confer obligations. The defense argues that good faith discussions were ongoing and accuses Plaintiffs of rushing to court to distract from their own refusal to produce medical records.
034.pdf
A letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Debra C. Freeman dated April 15, 2020, requesting a 30-day extension for various deadlines in civil cases filed by Jane Doe 1000, Teresa Helm, and Juliette Bryant against the Epstein Estate executors. The request cites the ongoing pandemic as the reason for the delay and lists specific new dates for discovery and reports, which Judge Freeman approved via a 'SO ORDERED' endorsement on the same day.
016.pdf
This document is a Scheduling Order from the US District Court (SDNY) dated February 11, 2020, issued by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. It consolidates deadlines for discovery, expert reports, and status updates for thirteen related civil cases involving plaintiffs suing the Epstein estate executors (Indyke) and related entities. The order sets a fact discovery deadline of June 10, 2020, and mentions ongoing settlement discussions.
011.pdf
This document is a court order filed on January 14, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman in the Southern District of New York. It coordinates the discovery schedules for multiple civil cases filed against the Jeffrey Epstein estate (represented by Indyke et al.) by various plaintiffs claiming sexual abuse. The order mandates the submission of discovery plans by February 6, 2020, and sets a joint pretrial conference for February 11, 2020.
015.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York, dated September 4, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. The order applies to multiple civil cases filed against 'Indyke et al.' (executors of the Epstein estate) and 'Nine East 71st Street et al.' The proceedings are stayed to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, with status reports required starting October 1, 2020.
038.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York, dated September 4, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. The order applies to multiple civil cases against Indyke et al. and Nine East 71st Street et al., staying proceedings to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. Parties are ordered to submit status reports starting October 1, 2020.
071.pdf
This document is a joint status report filed on August 14, 2020, by attorneys for both the Plaintiff (Jane Doe 1000) and the Defendants (Executors of the Epstein Estate). They requested a 45-day extension to the stay of discovery because the Plaintiff had submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program and was awaiting a determination. The document includes a handwritten order by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman dated September 11, 2020, granting the requested extension.
070.pdf
A court order dated September 4, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman of the Southern District of New York. The order directs the docketing of stays in multiple lawsuits against Indyke et al. and Nine East 71st Street et al. to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. Parties are required to submit status reports starting October 1, 2020.
069.pdf
A joint status report filed on August 14, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The attorneys for both parties inform Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program and request a 45-day extension to the stay of discovery to allow time for an eligibility determination.
068.pdf
A Notice of Change of Address filed on July 10, 2020, in the Southern District of New York case Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke et al. Attorney Matthew J. Aaronson notifies the court that his firm, Troutman Sanders LLP, is now named Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, though the address remains 875 Third Avenue, New York.
067.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Change of Address' filed on July 10, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke et al. Attorney Valerie Sirota notifies the court that her firm name has changed from Troutman Sanders LLP to Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, though her physical address in New York remains the same. She confirms she will continue to serve as counsel of record in the case.
065.pdf
A 'Notice of Change of Address' filed on July 9, 2020, in the Southern District of New York case Jane Doe 1000 v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn. Attorney Mary 'Molly' S. Dirago notifies the court that her firm name has changed from Troutman Sanders LLP to Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, while her physical address in Chicago remains the same.
061.pdf
This is a Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order filed in the US District Court (SDNY) on June 12, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The parties agreed to stay (pause) the lawsuit for 60 days to allow the Plaintiff to participate in the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, a non-adversarial alternative for resolving sexual abuse claims. If the claim is resolved through the program, the Plaintiff agrees to discontinue the legal action with prejudice.
054.pdf
This document is a Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order filed on May 21, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It establishes strict protocols for handling confidential discovery materials, including medical records, financial data, and the identities of minor victims, to protect privacy during litigation. The order outlines procedures for designating information as confidential, limits who may view such materials, and provides a Non-Disclosure Agreement form (Exhibit A) for third parties.
053.pdf
This document is a legal filing in the civil case Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke & Kahn. It includes a letter from Plaintiff's counsel arguing that the Epstein Estate executors are improperly limiting discovery to a 4-year period and refusing to produce documents regarding Epstein's broader sex-trafficking conspiracy. Attached as Exhibit A are the Defendants' supplemental responses to interrogatories, which list specific employees (including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and pilots like Larry Visoski), email accounts used by Epstein (specifically noting 'jeevacation@gmail.com' and 'jeeproject@yahoo.com'), and numerous phone numbers associated with his properties in New York, Palm Beach, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands.
052.pdf
Legal correspondence from Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Freeman regarding the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The defense argues against the Plaintiff's request for a 21-year discovery period, stating the alleged abuse occurred only between 1999 and 2002, and asserts that they are already processing a database of over 730,000 documents. The document mentions that flight logs will be produced if the complaint alleges the Plaintiff traveled on Epstein's plane, but does not contain the logs themselves.
051.pdf
This document is a legal letter filed on May 11, 2020, by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley on behalf of Plaintiff Jane Doe 1000 in her case against Epstein estate executors Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn. The letter requests a court conference to address the Defendants' alleged failure to participate in discovery, specifically noting their refusal to produce documents regarding Epstein's broader sex-trafficking conspiracy and failure to answer interrogatories regarding Epstein's email accounts. The Plaintiff argues that the Defendants are engaging in intentional delay tactics.
050.pdf
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on May 8, 2020, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney Valerie Sirota of Troutman Sanders LLP formally notifies the court that she is representing defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein against plaintiff Jane Doe 1000.
049.pdf
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on May 8, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:19-CV-10577-LJL-DCF). Attorney Charles L. Glover of Troutman Sanders LLP formally enters his appearance as counsel representing defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein.
046.pdf
This document is a legal filing from Plaintiff Jane Doe 1000's counsel requesting a pre-motion conference to compel Defendants (Epstein's executors Indyke and Kahn) to produce discovery documents and answer interrogatories. The filing includes exhibits of the discovery requests, which seek detailed information on Epstein's flight logs, financial transactions, communications with high-profile individuals (Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz), and the structure of his alleged sex-trafficking operation. The Defendants have objected to almost all requests, claiming they are overbroad or that they lack knowledge because Epstein is deceased, prompting the Plaintiff to seek court intervention. Note: While flight logs are requested, no actual flight data is contained in this document.
045.pdf
Defense counsel Bennet Moskowitz submits a letter to the Court in the 'Jane Doe 1000' case, attaching a recent Order from Judge Paul Engelmayer in the 'Jane Doe 15' case. The attached Order dismisses Jane Doe 15's claim for punitive damages against the Epstein Estate, ruling that under both New York and New Mexico law, punitive damages cannot be recovered from a deceased tortfeasor's estate. The Order details allegations that Jane Doe 15 was groomed by Epstein's secretary in New York and subsequently abused by Epstein at his New Mexico ranch in 2004.
042.pdf
A letter filed on April 15, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman. The letter requests a 30-day extension on various discovery and filing deadlines in three cases involving the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1000, Teresa Helm, and Juliette Bryant) due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Judge signed and ordered the request on the same day.
035.pdf
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on March 6, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:19-cv-10577). Attorney Andrew Villacastin of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP is entering his appearance as counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe 1000 in her lawsuit against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn.
No Subject
Told her Epstein had connections to modeling jobs and asked if she wanted to meet him.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity