juror
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
relative or close friend
|
Friend |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Shared experience |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
attorney
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
trial participants
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
unidentified speaker
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
therapist
|
Doctor patient |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
juror
|
Peers co deliberators |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
judicial officer
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Brune
|
Investigative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | The Trial | Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Voir dire, the process of jury selection, is discussed. | Court (implied) | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A post-verdict hearing was held where a trial court found a juror demonstrated bias. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Crime | A juror in the Ashfar case was sexually assaulted by a babysitter when he was five or six years o... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal action | In the cited case of Torres, the district court struck a juror for cause because she had engaged ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | The document is a questionnaire for potential jurors for an upcoming trial involving Ghislaine Ma... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Jury deliberation | A period of jury deliberation during which a conversation between Schoeman and Trzaskoma took place. | Court | View |
| N/A | Jury deliberation | The document describes the rules and procedures for the jury's deliberation process to reach a ve... | Jury room (implied) | View |
| N/A | Jury selection (voir dire) | A series of questions are posed to potential jurors to assess their impartiality and potential bi... | court | View |
| N/A | Jury selection | A questionnaire is being used to vet potential jurors for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, specifically as... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Juror questioning | A juror was asked about a question on his juror questionnaire regarding whether he had been a vic... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Jury deliberation | The jury is instructed on the procedures for beginning their deliberations, including electing a ... | jury room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial about child sexual abuse where a juror allegedly made misstatements. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror made public statements about his traumatic experiences. | Public | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror participation in trial | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror posted on social media about serving on the jury and communicated with witness Annie Farmer. | Twitter (Online) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filling out of jury questionnaire where the juror felt rushed. | Court / Jury Assembly Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Daily trial proceedings requiring attendance from 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. | Courthouse | View |
| N/A | N/A | Judge restarted jury deliberations due to juror illness | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection (Voir Dire) | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Trial | A trial concerning alleged sex crimes against underage girls, involving sexually suggestive or ex... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Discussion of the legal doctrine of 'inferred bias' in the context of jury selection and dismissa... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A hearing where a juror gave answers about childhood abuse. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Crime | A juror in the Sampson case had been threatened by her husband with a gun, which she did not disc... | N/A | View |
| 2025-11-29 | Trial | The expected period for the criminal trial, for which the potential juror's availability is being... | courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00014744.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the dismissal of a jury after a unanimous verdict. The judge confirms the verdict with two individual jurors, Juror No. 119 and Juror No. 7, before formally dismissing the entire jury. The judge provides explicit instructions that while jurors are free to discuss their own experiences, they are forbidden from revealing the identities of other jurors or any information under seal, including the identities of anonymous witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00017370.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022. An unidentified speaker, presumably a judge or attorney, deliberates on the decision to excuse a juror, expressing regret for not keeping an additional juror and outlining a plan for one final discussion before making the dismissal.
DOJ-OGR-00005373.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated October 22, 2021, containing proposed voir dire questions and jury instructions. It specifically highlights disputes between the Government and the Defense regarding whether potential jurors should be asked live questions about their knowledge of or dealings with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The text includes standard admonitions to jurors not to discuss the case and to report any outside communication attempts.
DOJ-OGR-00005356.jpg
This document is page 34 of a court filing (Document 367) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 22, 2021. It appears to be a blank page from a juror questionnaire or note-taking form, containing a field for 'Juror ID' and ruled lines for writing.
DOJ-OGR-00005347.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire filed in a federal criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) on October 22, 2021. The questions aim to gauge potential jurors' backgrounds and biases related to mental health, law, and law enforcement. The document also contains legal arguments between the prosecution (Government) and the defense, with the Government objecting to certain questions as burdensome and the defense arguing they are necessary to identify potential juror bias.
DOJ-OGR-00005346.jpg
This document is page 24 of a juror questionnaire for a federal criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It contains questions designed to screen potential jurors for biases or personal experiences related to sexual abuse, sex trafficking, and sex crimes involving minors. A comment on the document indicates that the U.S. Government proposed some of the specific wording used in the questions.
DOJ-OGR-00005343.jpg
This document is page 21 of a court filing (Document 367) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It contains a draft juror questionnaire focusing on potential jurors' opinions on sex trafficking laws and personal history with sexual abuse. The document highlights a legal dispute where the Government objects to specific questions proposed by the Defense (highlighted in green text) regarding the jurors' personal victimization history, arguing they are inappropriate, while the Defense argues these questions are necessary to identify bias against Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00005328.jpg
This document is page 6 of a juror questionnaire filed on October 22, 2021, for the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The blank form asks a potential juror about their employment history, supervisory roles, children, personal and family hobbies, organizational affiliations (such as religious or professional groups), and any history as a published author. The form is designed to gather background information for the jury selection process.
DOJ-OGR-00005312.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire for the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. It contains questions designed to determine if a potential juror has prior knowledge of Ms. Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein and whether that knowledge would prevent them from being fair and impartial. The questions also probe whether a juror's personal experiences, as indicated in previous answers, would affect their ability to serve.
DOJ-OGR-00005311.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing in the criminal case of Ms. Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated October 22, 2021. It contains a series of questions for a potential juror to assess their ability to follow fundamental legal instructions, such as the presumption of innocence, avoiding media reports and independent research, and to confirm their availability for the trial scheduled between November 29 and January 15.
DOJ-OGR-00005299.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire for a federal criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It aims to identify potential biases by asking jurors about their ability to remain impartial in a case involving sex crimes against minors. The questions specifically address the sexually explicit nature of the evidence, views on age of consent laws, and opinions on the enforcement of federal sex trafficking laws.
DOJ-OGR-00005288.jpg
This document is page 12 of a juror questionnaire for a federal criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It queries potential jurors on their history with the legal system, including prior jury service, participation in court cases as a witness or defendant, and any involvement they or their close relations have had with governmental or law enforcement investigations.
DOJ-OGR-00008787.jpg
This legal document is an excerpt of a judge's final instructions to a jury in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 19, 2021. The judge outlines the procedural requirements for reaching a unanimous verdict, communicating the verdict to the court via the marshal, and maintaining courtesy and respect during deliberations. The judge also informs the jury of a brief pause for a side bar conference with counsel and the reporter before the case is officially submitted to them.
Jury Selection Questionnaire
Juror filled out a questionnaire regarding knowledge of the case.
Jury Selection / Voir Dire
The Court questions a juror about their exposure to case information, availability for a six-week trial starting Nov 29, and familiarity with lists of names and entities involved in the case.
Unknown
A note received in court used as a timeline anchor.
Therapy and stress
Stated they see a therapist regularly who helped with stress from the case.
Memory of abuse
Quote regarding vivid memory of sexual abuse.
Unknown
Reference to receiving 'the juror note'.
No Subject
A note from a juror, the receipt of which is used as a time marker in the questioning.
respondeat superior and vicarious liability
A juror sent a note to the court that included the legal terms 'respondeat superior' and 'vicarious liability'.
respondeat superior and vicarious liability
A juror sent a note to the court that included the legal terms 'respondeat superior' and 'vicarious liability'.
juror letter
A 'juror letter' is mentioned, the receipt of which is a time marker for when certain facts were learned.
respondeat superior and vicarious liability
A juror sent a note to the court that referred to the legal concepts of respondeat superior and vicarious liability.
Desiree Washington's Credibility
Statement regarding loss of belief in the accuser and regret over conviction.
Train Delay
Juror called worried about being late due to a train issue; court advised them to get there safely.
Voir Dire Questioning
The Court asks the juror about radio/podcast habits, hobbies, following criminal cases, charitable contributions, and their ability to be fair and impartial.
Jury Selection / Voir Dire
Reference to previous questioning that occurred on November 16 regarding bias.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity