["The Court"]
PersonRelationship Network
History as a victim of crime or sexual abuse
Juror No. 50 denied being a victim of a crime, sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment on his questionnaire, which the document alleges was untruthful.
History as a victim of sexual abuse
A second deliberating juror denied being a victim of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment on their questionnaire, which the document alleges was untruthful.
History as a victim of sexual abuse
The 5 alternate jurors and 12 deliberating jurors all disclosed on their questionnaires that they were not victims of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment.
Juror's background and ability to be impartial
Juror 50 answered 'no' to Question 48 regarding being a victim of sexual abuse, but answered Question 47 stating he could assess the credibility of a witness claiming sexual assault or abuse like any other witness. These answers are central to the legal argument in the document.
History as a victim of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or s...
The document states that all jurors denied being victims of sexual abuse, assault, or harassment on their questionnaires. It alleges that Juror No. 50 and a second juror were untruthful in their responses.
Witness testimony issue
Ms. Comey requests permission to submit a letter to the court to look into the issue being discussed regarding witnesses.
Discrepancy in conspiracy end date
Ms. Moe states that if the conspiracy end date mentioned by the court (July 2004) differs from the sentencing transcript, they will submit a letter to the Court.
Juror scheduling and potential trial break
Mr. Pagliuca expresses that he does not want to delay the trial but needs to know if the juror in question is from the main or alternate pool to make a decision, as it affects his prior peremptory challenges.
Duration of a criminal conspiracy
MS. MOE argues to the Court that a conspiracy was still active at the end of 2004, citing Carolyn's testimony about visiting Epstein's house as evidence.
Duration of a criminal conspiracy
MS. MOE argues to the Court that a conspiracy was still active at the end of 2004, citing Carolyn's testimony about visiting Epstein's house as evidence.
Knowledge about a juror
During conference calls with the Court, the defense allegedly resisted the Court and government learning about their knowledge of a juror.
Knowledge about a juror
During conference calls with the Court, the defense allegedly resisted the Court and government learning about their knowledge of a juror.
Ms. Maxwell's positive contributions as an inmate
An unsolicited letter was submitted to the Court from one of Ms. Maxwell's fellow inmates, describing her as an asset to the unit.
Appointment of counsel for Juror Number 50
Retained counsel for Juror Number 50 communicated to the Court that the juror does not wish to have counsel appointed.
No Subject
Footnote 2 mentions that one of the witnesses submitted a letter to the Court, and argues that while the CVRA permits the right to be heard, the letter should not be given legal weight in the bail analysis.
Bail analysis
Footnote 2 mentions that one of the witnesses submitted a letter to the Court, which the defense argues should be given no legal weight in the bail analysis.
Aiding and abetting
A note from the jury is mentioned, which prompted the discussion. The note is believed to be about flights to and from New Mexico.
Bail analysis
Footnote 2 mentions that one of the witnesses submitted a letter to the Court, which the defense argues should be given no legal weight in the bail analysis.
Unspecified application
A written application received by the court from the government the night before the hearing. Ms. Moe confirms the government is making the application.
Proposed follow-up questions for a potential juror.
Mr. Everdell mentions a letter in which they proposed follow-up questions for a potential juror regarding his belief about victim memory.
Critique of a past failure to investigate and report info...
The speaker is addressing the court, recounting and criticizing how an unnamed woman and her seniors handled information from a Westlaw report, leading to what the judge called a 'tragic misjudgment'.
Juror 50's intention to assert Fifth Amendment privilege
A letter referenced in the main document (Dkt. 624) indicating that Juror 50 will assert the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination at an upcoming hearing.
Inquiry about Count Four
The jury sent a note to the court asking a question specifically about Count Four of the charges.
Maxwell Reply
A reply brief filed by the Defendant, Maxwell, which raises an argument about the jury instructions.
End of day deliberations
The jury sent a note to the court stating they were leaving at 5:30 and thanking the court.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity