Ghislaine

Person
Mentions
538
Relationships
144
Events
169
Documents
247
Also known as:
Ghislaine (Maxwell) Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell Ghislaine Maxwell (spelled Ghislane) Ghislaine [Maxwell]

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
144 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person JEFFREY
Business associate
11 Very Strong
10
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Communicated with
10 Very Strong
4
View
person JEFFREY
Friend
10 Very Strong
16
View
person Epstein
Friend
10 Very Strong
10
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Communicated
10 Very Strong
4
View
person Bill Clinton
Friend
10 Very Strong
2
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Business associate
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Espinosa
Professional
10 Very Strong
11
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Association
10 Very Strong
8
View
person Rodgers
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
In communication
9 Strong
3
View
person Epstein
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
person Epstein
Business associate
8 Strong
3
View
person MR. EPSTEIN
Business associate
8 Strong
3
View
person Visoski
Professional
8 Strong
2
View
person JEFFREY
Professional
7
3
View
person Espinosa
Friend
7
2
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Friend
7
3
View
person Kate
Business associate
7
3
View
person Trump
Acquaintance
7
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Professional
7
3
View
person Annie
Acquaintance
7
3
View
person Sarah
Planned to meet and travel together
6
1
View
person Mr. Epstein
Friend
6
2
View
person Annie
Friend
6
2
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Meeting Annie met Ghislaine for the first and only time. Santa Fe View
N/A Trip Annie, at age 16, went to Santa Fe with her mother's permission and met Ghislaine for the first a... Santa Fe View
N/A Captivity The author describes being held captive by 'Wexner's thugs via Ghislaine and Jeffrey,' which resu... N/A View
N/A Meeting The witness met Ghislaine at Mr. Epstein's residence on one or two occasions to drop off or retri... 9 East 71st Street, New York View
N/A Residency The witness lived in Ghislaine's residence. Upper East Side View
N/A Relocation Ghislaine moved from a residence on the Upper East Side to one on 65th Street. New York View
N/A Massage A massage performed by Ghislaine on A. Farmer, which is the subject of the court testimony. N/A View
N/A Meeting Hesse describes her initial meeting with Ghislaine, where she received instructions on how to han... N/A View
N/A Meeting Annie met Ghislaine once in Santa Fe. Santa Fe View
N/A Travel preparation Logistical preparations for Jeffrey Epstein's travel, which included keeping all houses prepared,... Jeffrey Epstein's residences View
N/A Meeting A seventeen-year-old, blond, slim girl was having tea with Ghislaine at Maxwell's townhouse in Lo... Maxwell's townhouse in London View
N/A Residency Ian Maxwell stayed rent-free at his sister Ghislaine's home for six months during his divorce. London View
N/A Incarceration Ghislaine was incarcerated for close on two years under what her brother describes as intolerable... N/A View
N/A Arrest Ghislaine's arrest is mentioned as the point when the author's frequent calls with her ceased. N/A View
N/A Employment Espinosa worked for Ghislaine for roughly six years. 457 Madison Avenue View
N/A Flight Arrangement of flights on private planes, specifically communicating the departure ('wheels up') ... Teterboro airport View
N/A Dating Epstein was dating other women behind Ghislaine's back. N/A View
N/A Massage A massage during which Ghislaine massaged A. Farmer's chest and upper breast. N/A View
N/A Job change The witness, Espinosa, changed jobs from working with Jeffrey Epstein's legal counsel to becoming... N/A View
N/A Social interaction Visoski's two young daughters spent time with Ghislaine on a ranch in New Mexico. the ranch in New Mexico View
N/A Phone call Ghislaine called Jeffrey. N/A View
N/A Recreational activity Ghislaine would take Visoski's daughters riding on the horses at the ranch. the ranch in New Mexico View
N/A Trip A trip to New Mexico taken by the witness, A. Farmer, where they encountered Ghislaine. New Mexico View
N/A Trip A work trip to Madrid while working on different publications. Madrid View
N/A Meeting The last time Harriett Jagger saw Ghislaine, where they discussed Ghislaine's desire for a family. New York View

DOJ-OGR-00014812.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript, likely a victim impact statement in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The speaker, a victim, condemns Ghislaine's lack of remorse and refusal to take responsibility for trafficking women and children to Jeffrey Epstein and others. The speaker argues that no personal hardship, such as a difficult childhood, can excuse the gravity of her crimes and believes her lack of remorse indicates she would commit them again.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014754.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 22, 2022, detailing a judge's rulings on objections from an attorney, Mr. Everdell. The judge overrules objections concerning the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, citing evidence from the trial. This evidence includes testimony from Juan Alessi about Maxwell targeting a victim named Virginia at Mar-a-Lago, metadata linking Maxwell to a document via the username 'Ghislaine', and bank statements showing a $23 million transfer from Epstein to Maxwell during their conspiracy.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001638.jpg

This legal document, dated July 21, 2020, is page 4 of a filing to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It argues that public statements made by FBI Special Agent William Sweeney and attorneys for witnesses (David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Bradley Edwards) are prejudicial against Ghislaine Maxwell and violate local court rules. The document quotes these individuals characterizing Maxwell as a villain, speculating on her cooperation, and defining her role as the primary facilitator for Jeffrey Epstein's crimes.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001124.jpg

This legal document, filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, argues that she was not a flight risk prior to her arrest. It asserts that she intentionally moved to New Hampshire to be within driving distance of New York prosecutors and that her legal counsel was in regular, documented contact with the government for months. The filing aims to counter the government's portrayal of her as a fugitive by demonstrating her intent to remain in the U.S. and face any potential charges.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001116.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, outlines the financial support for Ms. Maxwell's bail application. It details several bonds being posted by friends and a security company, including a $3.5 million bond from one individual risking their entire assets and a $1 million bond from a security company. The document argues that these significant financial pledges from people who know her well, and who are risking their own livelihoods and reputations, serve as strong evidence that Ms. Maxwell is not a flight risk.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000682.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing containing a first-person account of a sexual assault. The narrator describes being brought to 'Jeffrey's island' where an associate, Sarah Kellen, led her to a villa shared by Jeffrey and Ghislaine under the pretense of giving a massage, at which point Jeffrey raped her. The narrator states this was the beginning of three years of abuse and that she was hospitalized for two weeks following this initial assault.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00019052.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers, a pilot. Rodgers testifies that he kept his own personal pilot logbook and did not send it to Ghislaine (Maxwell), nor did he have reason to believe she reviewed flight manifests or knew which passengers were on flights she did not attend. The questioning then shifts to the ownership of Mr. Epstein's planes (a Gulfstream and a Boeing) between 1994 and 2004, specifically regarding their ownership by LLCs.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00019051.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. Rodgers confirms sending flight manifests, which were separate from the logbook, to Epstein's New York office on a monthly basis. The witness explicitly denies ever sending these manifests to Ghislaine.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00019039.jpg

This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of a witness named Rodgers (likely a pilot) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The testimony establishes the protocol for scheduling flights during the 1990s and 2000s: Rodgers only coordinated directly with Ghislaine when she was a passenger; otherwise, he coordinated with Epstein's secretaries. The testimony specifically identifies Lesley Groff as Epstein's secretary who handled these duties in the 2000s.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00019037.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony focuses on the procedures for scheduling flights for Mr. Epstein during the 1990s. Rodgers confirms that while he occasionally spoke with Mr. Epstein or Ghislaine directly, the primary point of contact for scheduling was typically Epstein's secretary in New York.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018674.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The testimony focuses on clarifying the meaning of the 'author' metadata in a Microsoft Word file. Flatley explains that the author name (e.g., 'gmax') is a user-defined field linked to the account that set up the software (e.g., 'Ghislaine') and does not definitively prove who was physically using the computer to create a specific document.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018667.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley. At the direction of an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, Mr. Flatley reads aloud three paragraphs from a document he wrote, which describes the close, long-term relationship between individuals named Jeffrey and Ghislaine. The text characterizes them as a couple who are rarely apart and portrays Ghislaine as intelligent and personable.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018662.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Flatley. Flatley confirms that specific government exhibits, identified as Microsoft Word documents, were saved within the documents folder of a Windows computer user account named 'Ghislaine'. The testimony includes a legal objection from Ms. Menninger regarding the scope of the questioning, which was overruled by the court.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018475.jpg

This document is page 138 of a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim cross-examines a witness named Kate regarding her memory of being asked to wear a uniform and an alleged conversation with Ghislaine about 'St. Trinian's,' which the witness does not recall. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) successfully objects to questions about costumes as being 'beyond the scope' of redirect.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018444.jpg

This document is a page from the court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Kate in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The witness admits to initiating contact with Jeffrey Epstein in 2011, asking to stay with him in New York, and maintaining contact with him via email over the years. Conversely, the witness confirms she had no email correspondence with Ghislaine Maxwell.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018433.jpg

This document is a court transcript of a sidebar discussion from a trial, filed on August 10, 2022. During the cross-examination of a witness named Kate, defense attorney Ms. Sternheim is questioned by the judge about the relevance of asking about the witness leaving her husband to travel with Ghislaine and Jeffrey Epstein. Opposing counsel, Ms. Pomerantz, objects to the line of questioning, arguing it is suggestive and should have been raised as a '412 issue'.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018431.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Kate, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on Kate's relationship with Ghislaine and Epstein, confirming she spent time with them in London and the United States. The questioner also probes inconsistencies in Kate's testimony regarding her age at marriage and references an incident where she failed to return to London from the U.S. while her husband was waiting for her.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018429.jpg

This document is page 92 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on Kate's history of 'periodic drug abuse' (cocaine, alcohol, sleeping pills) and her sobriety. It establishes that Kate met Ghislaine Maxwell at a home with a red door on Kinnerton Street around 1994, when Kate was approximately 17 years old.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018428.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The defense attorney questions Kate's memory reliability due to a ten-year period of substance abuse. Kate counters that her testimony relates to times she was sober, specifically stating she was required to not take drugs or be drunk when around Ghislaine and Jeffrey.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018412.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. Kate confirms that at the time she met Ghislaine and Epstein, she was an international model. She states she met Ghislaine in Paris while traveling with an older man she was dating, who she learned was an Oxford classmate of Ghislaine.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018410.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Kate by a lawyer, Ms. Sternheim. The questioning focuses on Kate's prior testimony about admiring a person named Ghislaine and probes into the wealth of her family, specifically her mother and her stepfather, who owned a private plane.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016370.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a massage performed by someone named Ghislaine, with the witness stating her entire breast was exposed and refuting the suggestion that the massage was not explicitly sexual. Attorneys Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Menninger are present, with the former making objections and the latter conducting the examination.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016362.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning centers on an incident where Ghislaine Maxwell massaged one of Jeffrey Epstein's feet and instructed the witness to massage the other. While the witness confirms there was no touching of private parts, they state they considered the event to be 'sexualized'.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016346.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a trip Farmer took to New Mexico, specifically whether Ghislaine Maxwell was involved in their transport, which the witness denies having knowledge of. Farmer confirms the trip was over a weekend and that they discussed this fact with their mother and subsequently informed the government of that conversation.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016345.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness identified as 'A. Farmer'. The questioning focuses on a trip to New Mexico, seeking to establish that the witness has no personal knowledge of Ghislaine Maxwell arranging, encouraging, or having prior knowledge of the travel logistics. The witness repeatedly states she does not know or does not have a memory of Ghislaine's involvement in the trip.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$5,000.00
4 transactions
Net Flow
-$5,000.00
4 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Paid Ghislaine JANE $0.00 Demand for payment mentioned in cross-examinati... View
2018-12-19 Paid Ghislaine Sarah $0.00 Settlement of a federal civil lawsuit (amount u... View
2018-12-19 Paid Ghislaine Sarah Ransome $0.00 Settlement of a federal civil lawsuit (amount u... View
2001-03-01 Paid Ghislaine Burberry $5,000.00 Purchase of a bag for Virginia. View
As Sender
65
As Recipient
12
Total
77

Tecno not answering phone

From: Ghislaine
To: JEFFREY

A message taken by 'AM' at 12:20 PM from Ghislaine for Jeffrey, stating that 'Tecno still doesn't answer the phone.' The message indicates Ghislaine telephoned and Jeffrey should call back.

Phone message
2005-03-05

No Subject

From: Ghislaine
To: Ghislaine

A message was taken at 7:50 A.M. for Ghislaine from Ghislaine. The message reads: 'Please call back'. This likely indicates she called a central number and left a message for herself as a reminder or for someone to relay.

Telephone message
2005-02-28

No Subject

From: Ghislaine
To: Ghislaine

A message was taken at 7:50 AM for Ghislaine from Ghislaine. The message is 'Please call Back'. This implies she called in to leave a message for herself or for staff.

Phone message
2005-02-28

No Subject

From: Ghislaine
To: Jeffrey Epstein

Pls call back

Phone message
2005-02-28

No Subject

From: Ghislaine
To: Jeffrey Epstein

Pls call back

Phone message
2005-02-28

No Subject

From: Ghislaine
To: Jeffrey Epstein

Pls call back

Phone message
2005-02-28

No Subject

From: Ghislaine
To: Ghislaine

A message was taken at 7:50 A.M. for Ghislaine from Ghislaine. The message reads: 'Please call back'. This likely indicates she called a central number and left a message for herself as a reminder or for someone to relay.

Telephone message
2005-02-28

Tad M called

From: Ghislaine
To: JEFFREY

A message was left for Jeffrey at 1:39 P.M. from Ghislaine, stating that 'Tad M called'.

Phone call
2005-02-25

No Subject

From: Ghislaine
To: Jeffrey Epstein

A phone message was taken for Jeffrey from Ghislaine at 1:39 AM. The message reads, 'Trid she called', and indicates that Jeffrey should please call back.

Phone message
2005-02-25

No Subject

From: Ghislaine
To: Jeffrey Epstein

A phone message was taken for Jeffrey from Ghislaine at 1:39 AM. The message reads, 'Trid she called', and indicates that Jeffrey should please call back.

Phone message
2005-02-25

Call Buck

From: Ghislaine
To: JEFFREY

Ghislaine left a message for Jeffrey asking him to call someone named Buck.

Phone call message
2005-01-28

Request for return call

From: Ghislaine
To: JEFFREY

A message was taken for Jeffrey at 11:00 A.M. from Ghislaine, who telephoned and requested he 'Please call her back'.

Phone call message
2005-01-24

No Subject

From: Ghislaine
To: JEFFREY

Ghislaine telephoned at 11:00 AM and left a message for Jeffrey to "Please call her back".

Phone message
2005-01-24

Request to call back

From: Ghislaine
To: JEFFREY

A message was taken for Jeffrey at 11:00 AM from Ghislaine, who telephoned and requested he call her back.

Phone message
2005-01-24

N/A

From: Ghislaine
To: JEFFREY

Marked as 'Telephoned' and 'Returned your call'. No written message body.

Call
2005-01-20

Returned Call

From: Ghislaine
To: JEFFREY

A message was taken for Jeffrey at 5:00 PM indicating Ghislaine had returned his call.

Phone call
2005-01-20

Phone call notification

From: Ghislaine
To: JEFFREY

A message for Jeffrey at 11:20 AM from Ghislaine, stating 'Just that she has called It's not important'.

Phone call
2005-01-11

Phone call

From: Ghislaine
To: JEFFREY

A message was taken for Jeffrey at 11:20 A.M. from Ghislaine, stating 'Just that she has called. It's not important'.

Phone call message
2005-01-11

No Subject

From: Ghislaine
To: Prince Andrew

Discussion about Virginia's age and joking she was 'getting too old for Jeffrey'.

Conversation
2001-03-01

No Subject

From: Ghislaine
To: Virginia

Instructions to get dressed to meet a Prince.

Conversation
2001-03-01

Instructions

From: Ghislaine
To: Virginia

Ghislaine said I was to start immediately and that someone would drive me home.

Conversation
2001-01-01

Flight Scheduling

From: Rodgers
To: Ghislaine

Coordination of flights when Ghislaine was a passenger.

Call
1990-01-01

Travel logistics

From: Ghislaine
To: GE

A message was left by 'Ghislaine' for 'GE' at 3:40 PM. The message states: 'SHE LET LARRY GO. THE ONLY FLIGHT TO PB leaves at. 3.15. Not heard from Tom Ford. If you call it mious she will pick up TF alone in the elicopter. If you want to chouge please call GM back'. 'chouge' is likely a misspelling of 'change'. 'mious' is a difficult-to-read word.

Phone message
0020-01-01

No Subject

From: Ghislaine
To: JE

Ghislaine called to report that she 'LET LARRY GO' and that the only flight to PB leaves at 3:15. She hadn't heard from Tom Ford (TF) but said if JE calls 'mious' (unclear word), she would pick TF up alone in the helicopter. Instructs JE to 'call GM back' if he wants to change plans.

Phone message
0020-01-01

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity