| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
JEFFREY
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Communicated with |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
JEFFREY
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Communicated |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Bill Clinton
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Espinosa
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Association |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
In communication |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Visoski
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Espinosa
|
Friend |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Trump
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Annie
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Sarah
|
Planned to meet and travel together |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Friend |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Annie
|
Friend |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1993-08-07 | Flight | Flight from FOK to TVC. | FOK to TVC | View |
| 1993-08-06 | Flight | Flight from PVD to IAD. | PVD to IAD | View |
| 1993-07-30 | Flight | Flight from TEB to PVD. | TEB to PVD | View |
| 1993-06-14 | Flight | Flight from PBI to TEB. Passengers: JEFFREY, GHISLAINE, 1 FEMALE. | From PBI to TEB | View |
| 1993-06-11 | Flight | Flight from TEB to PBI. Passengers: JEFFREY, GHISLAINE, 1 FEMALE. | From TEB to PBI | View |
| 1993-05-30 | Flight | Flight from PBI to TEB. Passengers: JEFFREY, GHISLAINE. | From PBI to TEB | View |
| 1993-05-27 | Flight | Flight from TEB to PBI. Passengers: JEFFREY, GHISLAINE. | From TEB to PBI | View |
| 1993-05-20 | Flight | Flight from CMH to TEB. Passengers: JEFFREY, GHISLAINE. | From CMH to TEB | View |
| 1993-05-19 | Flight | Flight from TEB to CMH. Passengers: JEFFREY, GHISLAINE. | From TEB to CMH | View |
| 1993-05-12 | Flight | Flight from PBI to TEB. Passengers: JEFFREY, GHISLAINE, JON STEFANIDES. | From PBI to TEB | View |
| 1993-05-11 | Flight | Flight from SAF to PBI. Passengers: JEFFREY, GHISLAINE, JON STEFANIDES. | From SAF to PBI | View |
| 1993-05-09 | Flight | Flight from EGE to SAF. Passengers: JEFFREY, GHISLAINE, JON STEFANIDES, GURMIT DHILLON. | From EGE to SAF | View |
| 1993-05-09 | Flight | Flight from CMH to EGE. Passengers: JEFFREY, GHISLAINE, JON STEFANIDES. | From CMH to EGE | View |
| 1992-12-19 | Flight | Flight from ICT to SAF. | ICT to SAF | View |
| 1992-12-19 | Flight | Flight from TEB to ICT. | TEB to ICT | View |
| 1992-12-18 | Flight | Flight from DCA to TEB. | DCA to TEB | View |
| 1992-07-05 | Flight | Flight from ASE to GRI. | Between ASE and GRI | View |
| 1992-07-02 | Flight | Flight from SAF to ASE. | Between SAF and ASE | View |
| 1992-07-02 | Flight | Flight from CMH to SAF. | Between CMH and SAF | View |
| 1992-06-29 | Flight | Flight from TEB to CMH. | Between TEB and CMH | View |
| 1992-06-27 | Flight | Flight from CMH to BMI. | Between CMH and BMI | View |
| 1992-06-27 | Flight | Flight from BMI to ACK. | Between BMI and ACK | View |
| 1992-06-27 | Flight | Flight from ACK to TEB. | Between ACK and TEB | View |
| 1992-06-18 | Flight | Flight from TEB to PBI. | Between TEB and PBI | View |
| 1992-06-14 | Flight | Flight from CMH to TEB. | Between CMH and TEB | View |
This document is a letter of support, filed on December 14, 2020, for a bail application for an individual named Ghislaine. The anonymous author attests to Ghislaine's good character, refutes allegations that she was hiding from law enforcement, and pledges to sign a $3.5 million bond, representing all of their personal assets, to secure her release. The author expresses complete confidence that Ghislaine will remain in the United States to face the charges against her.
This document is a character reference submitted as part of a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on December 14, 2020. The redacted author expresses unwavering belief in Ghislaine's innocence and offers their $1.5 million property, their sole retirement asset, as collateral for her bail. The author describes Ghislaine as a compassionate, caring, and non-violent person with whom they and their children have always felt completely safe.
This document is a letter dated November 30, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, providing a character reference for Ghislaine. The author, whose name is redacted, describes a lifelong friendship with Ghislaine, highlighting her positive qualities, shared interests, and dedication to the non-profit TerraMar Project for ocean protection.
This legal document is a declaration from an unnamed individual defending Ghislaine against public accusations and media reports. The author attests that Ghislaine was not a fugitive but was forced into hiding due to a dangerous media frenzy, which included a £10,000 bounty offered by The Sun newspaper, and threats on social media. The author asserts Ghislaine's consistent claims of innocence and her desire for a fair legal process to clear her name.
This document is a character statement describing the relationship between Jeffrey and Ghislaine. The author portrays them as a deeply connected couple of 11 years who are also best friends, sharing many interests while also maintaining individual pursuits. The text emphasizes their compatibility, mutual admiration, and constant companionship, painting a very positive picture of their partnership.
This document is a page from a court transcript of a sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated June 29, 2023. The speaker, likely her defense counsel, argues for a reasonable sentence by citing mitigating factors from her life. These factors include the traumatic accident and death of her eldest brother, the overwhelming influence of her 'narcissistic' father, and the 'controlling, demanding, manipulative' influence of Jeffrey Epstein on her adulthood.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated June 29, 2023, from the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It contains the end of a victim impact statement from Ms. Ransome, who directly addresses Maxwell, and the beginning of another statement from Ms. Stein. Ms. Stein recounts moving to New York in 1991, attending FIT, and working at Henri Bendel, where she first encountered Ghislaine Maxwell as a customer.
This document is a victim impact statement from a legal proceeding dated June 29, 2023. An unnamed speaker, who has known Ghislaine for many years, describes her as a manipulative and cruel person who uses kindness for personal gain. The speaker expresses solidarity with other victims and declares their own empowerment and resilience in overcoming the trauma inflicted by Ghislaine.
This document is a transcript of a victim impact statement, likely related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The speaker, a victim, condemns Maxwell for her lack of remorse and refusal to accept responsibility for trafficking women and children for Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker argues that no personal hardship, such as a difficult childhood or financial loss, can excuse the gravity of her crimes.
This court transcript page, dated June 29, 2023, documents a judge overruling several objections from attorney Mr. Everdell. The judge upholds evidence against the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, including testimony that she targeted a victim named Virginia, metadata suggesting she authored an essay, and the assertion that she received approximately $23 million from co-conspirator Epstein.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on Rodgers' 30-year employment with Mr. Epstein, establishing that Rodgers never witnessed any behavior from Ghislaine that suggested she was helping Epstein abuse underage girls. Rodgers also confirms he was comfortable with his own teenage daughter spending time with Ghislaine.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning establishes a timeline, noting that Sarah Kellen became an assistant around September 2001 and that by 2003-2004, Ghislaine was flying significantly less with Mr. Epstein. This change coincided with Ghislaine entering a committed relationship with Ted Waitt, the cofounder of Gateway computers, by 2004.
This document is a transcript of a cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on the relationship between Ghislaine Maxwell and Mr. Epstein during the 1990s and 2000s. Rodgers confirms that Maxwell maintained residences separate from Epstein and that, from his perspective, she always had an 'employment role' with him.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on the living arrangements of Mr. Epstein in the early 1990s, establishing that he lived in a trailer on a newly purchased property while the main house was under construction. The witness confirms they stayed in a separate bunkhouse at a location called "Ranch Central" and the questioning begins to explore where Ghislaine lived in New York during the same period.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on Jeffrey Epstein's associates, confirming a romantic relationship with Shelly Lewis in 2002 and probing the specifics of Ghislaine's access to a shared charter plane, suggesting her access may have been limited to the 1990s.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on flights taken by Jeffrey Epstein, Sophie Biddle, and Frances Jardine to and from locations including Midway, Aspen, and Traverse City. The transcript also explores potential relationships, questioning if Frances Jardine was Epstein's girlfriend and if Epstein used a house in Aspen owned by someone named Wexner.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning concerns flight logs, specifically a flight to Teterboro on August 18th with 'Jeffrey' (Epstein) and two unnamed passengers, and flights on July 31st involving a 'James Murphy'. The transcript establishes that Ghislaine was not listed on these flights and identifies James Murphy as Epstein's traveling yoga instructor.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on identifying the passengers of a flight (1105) that took place on May 3, 1998, from Palm Beach to Teterboro. The witness confirms the identities of several passengers, including Emmy Taylor as Ghislaine's assistant, Glenn and Eva Dubin with their children, and Gwendolyn Beck as a friend of Jeffrey's.
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation given by Ms. Menninger. She argues that the jury should hesitate to convict due to a lack of credible evidence, pointing to inconsistencies in testimonies, the timing of changed stories relative to the opening of a victims' compensation fund, and the absence of physical proof like photographs or financial records. The speaker repeatedly uses the phrase 'That should make you hesitate' to emphasize her points about the weakness of the prosecution's case.
This document is a summation by Ms. Menninger in a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Menninger argues for reasonable doubt regarding Carolyn's involvement in Count Six, suggesting Carolyn added Ghislaine Maxwell to her story after financial difficulties. The summation also addresses the government's conspiracy theory involving Epstein and Maxwell arranging for underage females to travel to New York for sex acts, clarifying that Carolyn did not travel to New York and Annie Farmer's travel was independent of Ghislaine Maxwell.
This document is a page from a court transcript featuring the summation by Ms. Menninger, likely in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text focuses on discrediting the testimony of Juan Alessi regarding the household hierarchy involving Epstein and Ghislaine, as well as questioning the validity of evidence concerning a household manual and a black address book.
This document is a court transcript of a summation by Ms. Menninger, likely a lawyer. The speaker is challenging the credibility of a witness's testimony by highlighting inconsistencies in her statements to the government over time (2006 vs. 2020 vs. current testimony) regarding a trip to New Mexico and interactions with Ghislaine and Epstein, including the purpose of the trip and the nature of massages she received.
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, who is attempting to discredit an unnamed female witness or victim. Menninger argues the woman's story is full of inconsistencies, citing discrepancies in her statements to the FBI about her housing, the timeline of meeting Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump, and her description of her family life. The speaker ultimately alleges that the woman is fabricating details, specifically inserting Ghislaine into her narrative under the influence of her personal injury lawyer, Mr. Glassman, to strengthen her case.
This document is a court transcript of a summation by Ms. Menninger, likely a defense attorney. Menninger argues against the credibility of a witness named 'Jane' by suggesting her memory of abuse in New Mexico was implanted by the government's repeated questioning. The attorney emphasizes that Jane does not recall Ghislaine being present with Jeffrey Epstein during any of the alleged abuse, which is a central point for the case.
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, who is attempting to undermine the credibility of a witness referred to as 'Jane'. Menninger highlights inconsistencies in the witness's statements, such as failing to identify Ghislaine and others in a sworn interrogatory, and contrasts her claims of extreme poverty with evidence that she and her brothers applied to an expensive arts camp costing $12,000 per year.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Ghislaine | JANE | $0.00 | Demand for payment mentioned in cross-examinati... | View |
| 2018-12-19 | Paid | Ghislaine | Sarah | $0.00 | Settlement of a federal civil lawsuit (amount u... | View |
| 2018-12-19 | Paid | Ghislaine | Sarah Ransome | $0.00 | Settlement of a federal civil lawsuit (amount u... | View |
| 2001-03-01 | Paid | Ghislaine | Burberry | $5,000.00 | Purchase of a bag for Virginia. | View |
Rodgers would occasionally speak to Ghislaine about flights.
A message from Ghislaine to Jeffrey: 'would be helpful to have [redacted/crossed out name] come to Palm Beach today to stay here and help train new staff with Ghislaine'.
Update on PR strategy, including contact with Dilenschneider and statement sent to Dan Mangan at NYPost.
Worried she had told police about them.
Ghislaine returned Jeffrey's call at 1:05 P.M. The message is 'Please call her back'.
A message was taken for Jeffrey at 2:10 PM from Ghislaine. The 'PLEASE CALL' box was checked.
A message was left for Jeffrey at 2:10 PM from Ghislaine, with the 'PLEASE CALL' box checked.
A message was left for Jeffrey at 2:10 PM from Ghislaine, with the 'PLEASE CALL' box checked.
A message was left for Jeffrey at 2:10 PM indicating Ghislaine telephoned and requested a return call.
Ghislaine returned Jeffrey's call at 1:05 P.M. The message is 'Please call her back'.
Checkbox 'PLEASE CALL' marked.
Ghislaine returned Jeffrey's call at 1:05 P.M. The message is 'Please call her back'.
A message was taken at 2:10 PM. The 'PLEASE CALL' box is checked.
A message was taken at 2:10 PM. The 'PLEASE CALL' box is checked.
Glen has pulled muscle and he is at the hospital 'Good Sam' They have called Dr. Moskovitz and everything has been organized. In this case probably they won't make for lunch.
Glen has pulled a muscle and is at Good Sam hospital. Dr. Moskalite has been called and everything is organized. They will probably not make it for lunch.
Glen has pulled a muscle and is at Good Sam hospital. Dr. Moskovitz has been called and everything is organized. They will probably not make it for lunch.
Glen has pulled a muscle and is at Good Sam hospital. Dr. Moskovitz has been called and everything is organized. They will probably not make it for lunch.
Ghislaine called at 12:20 PM to inform Jeffrey that Glen pulled a muscle, is at Good Sam hospital, Dr. Moskowitz has been called, and they will likely miss lunch.
A message was taken at 12:20 PM. Glen has pulled a muscle and is at Good Sam hospital. Dr. Moskovite has been called and everything is organized. A planned lunch will probably be cancelled.
Ghislaine called at 12:20 PM to inform Jeffrey that Glen pulled a muscle and is at 'Good Sam' hospital. Dr. Moskovite has been called and everything is organized. As a result, they will probably not make it for lunch. The message taker asked Jeffrey to call back.
A message taken at 12:20 PM. Ghislaine asked Jeffrey to call. The message reads: 'Tecno still doesn't answer the phone.' The note was signed by 'AM'.
A message taken by 'AM' at 12:20 PM from Ghislaine for Jeffrey, stating that 'Tecno still doesn't answer the phone.' The message indicates Ghislaine telephoned and Jeffrey should call back.
A message taken at 12:20 PM. Ghislaine asked Jeffrey to call. The message reads: 'Tecno still doesn't answer the phone.' The note was signed by 'AM'.
Tecno still doesn't answer the phone. The message slip indicates 'Please Call'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity