| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Judge Aldrich
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Tatiana
|
Travel companions |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ASA Weiss
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ASA Weiss
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Nathan Myhrvold
|
Resemblance scapegoat |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Virginia Roberts Giuffre
|
Accuser accused |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. SCAROLA
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged association |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Alleged abuser victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
Virginia
|
Accuser accused |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mrs. Dershowitz
|
Family |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified Male Subject
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Travel companion |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Travel companions |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Simpson
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Investigative Body
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Boies
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. McCAWLEY
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Massages of a sexual nature occurred while Mr. Dershowitz was allegedly present. | Epstein Property (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Failed attempts to interview Jeffrey Epstein | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Brief encounter between Mr. Epstein and Mr. Dershowitz at Epstein's New York mansion. | Mr. Epstein's mansion in Ne... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Dershowitz frequently seen with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Epstein allowed Mr. Dershowitz to use his bedroom. | Mr. Epstein's bedroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual encounter involving [Redacted Name] and Mr. Epstein, followed by Mr. Dershowitz entering a... | Mr. Epstein's bedroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Dershowitz visited Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach home 4-5 times a year, staying 2-3 days. | Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Several nude girls were having lunch at the pool, Mr. Dershowitz was present. [Redacted Name] sta... | Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach ho... | View |
| N/A | N/A | [Redacted Name] gave Mr. Dershowitz a massage on the beach at Little St. James, then went with hi... | Beach at Little St. James, ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Dershowitz received a massage at Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach house, stated the masseuse was not ... | Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Epstein introduced [Redacted Name] to Mr. Dershowitz. Epstein and Dershowitz argued against h... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dinner with Mr. Epstein and Mr. Dershowitz to discuss [Redacted Name]'s case. Dershowitz said lit... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Ransome was called to Mr. Epstein's mansion. Mr. Epstein, Mr. Dershowitz, and [Redacted Name]... | Mr. Epstein's mansion | View |
| N/A | N/A | Change in prosecutorial strategy | State Attorney's Office | View |
| N/A | N/A | Three days of intensive argument and questioning | Courtroom (implied Massachu... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Dershowitz met with prosecutors to share disparaging information about accusers found on MySp... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Approximately ten flights taken by Dershowitz | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Dershowitz provided flight logs to Palm Beach Police Department. | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dershowitz's presence at the mansion | Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beac... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flight involving Mr. Dershowitz and Tatiana/one female | Plane | View |
| N/A | N/A | Departure of Mr. and Mrs. Dershowitz | Deposition Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiations regarding police questioning of Epstein | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Dershowitz and his team investigated prosecutors and their families to disqualify them, but t... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lawyer for Ms. Maxwell mentioned Mr. Dershowitz was among people Epstein directed to have sex with. | Court proceedings | View |
| 2015-07-06 | N/A | Meeting regarding settlement discussions where Dershowitz claimed progress in convincing Boies of... | Unspecified | View |
This document is a transcript of a legal proceeding or interview, featuring Ghislaine Maxwell and Todd Blanche. Maxwell denies knowledge of inappropriate activities or massages involving Mr. Dershowitz and Mr. Epstein, and discusses her founding of the TerraMar Project in 2010 with Ted for sea explorations.
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, where an attorney argues against an article by Professor Green that opposes victim participation in legal proceedings. The attorney contends this view is inconsistent with the Crime Victim Rights Act, especially in the context of Mr. Epstein's prosecution, and asserts that the purpose of modern criminal law is to mitigate harm to victims. The attorney also informs the court of their advice to their clients that the government must move to dismiss the case.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report, dated February 17, 2006, primarily details surveillance activities conducted by Officer Lori S. Minot at 358 El Brillo over three days from March 31 to April 2, 2005. The report meticulously logs the presence and movement of numerous vehicles, identified by make, model, color, and license plate. The report also mentions a separate communication on January 3, 2006, involving ASA Weiss and Mr. Dershowitz regarding the unavailability of Mr. Dershowitz's assistants.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report, dated April 20, 2006, primarily details surveillance conducted by Officer Lori S. Minot at 358 El Brillo over three days in 2005 (March 31, April 1, and April 2). The report meticulously logs the presence of various vehicles and the observation of an unidentified young woman at the address. The document also notes a January 3, 2006, communication from ASA Weiss regarding a request for Mr. Dershowitz's assistants, who were reportedly unavailable and out of the country.
This document is a Palm Beach Police Department incident report containing two distinct sections. The first section details a January 2006 communication regarding Alan Dershowitz stating his assistants were out of the country and unavailable for questioning. The second section is a surveillance log from March/April 2005 detailing vehicles at 358 El Brillo (Epstein's residence), specifically noting the arrival of a young blonde female (teens to early 20s) driving a Grey Camaro.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report documents the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's telephone message books seized via search warrant. Detective Recarey notes messages stating "I have 2 girls for him" and references to "work." The report details police efforts to identify and locate girls mentioned in these records using yearbooks and subscriber information, including a visit to a minor's home in West Palm Beach on December 8, 2005.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or book (likely by Alan Dershowitz) produced during a House Oversight investigation (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017188). It recounts a legal argument Dershowitz made before Judges Julian and Aldrich concerning obscenity laws, privacy, and the 'Griswold v. Conn' precedent. Dershowitz argues that personal offense at the conduct of others is not a sufficient constitutional basis for banning that conduct, a position Judge Aldrich ultimately accepted in his decision.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (dated draft 4.2.12) by Alan Dershowitz, recounting a past appellate argument regarding obscenity and First Amendment rights. The text details an exchange with Judges Aldrich and Julian where Dershowitz argues that the *Stanley v. Georgia* decision should extend to movie theaters if proper warnings (prologues) are given to the audience. The page includes a humorous anecdote about a watchmaker/mohel and a hypothetical legal argument involving a 'Pornography Shop' in Boston.
This is page 4 of a signed affidavit by David S. Stone, dated April 5, 2019. Stone details a 2015 meeting where Alan Dershowitz attempted to convince attorney David Boies that Virginia Roberts (the client) was mistaken in her sexual allegations, suggesting she confused him with Nathan Myhrvold, who frequented Epstein's company. Stone attests that Boies never conceded the allegations were false and notes that Roberts passed a lie detector test.
This document contains pages 174 and 175 from James Patterson's book (likely 'Filthy Rich') included in House Oversight files. The text details the initial enthusiasm of State Attorney Krischer to prosecute Epstein, which drastically changed to leniency (suggesting a misdemeanor notice) after Epstein's lawyers, including Alan Dershowitz, intervened and Epstein's wealth became known. It also mentions Detective Recarey receiving advice from Daliah Weiss and the involvement of attorney Goldberger.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015550). The speaker testifies about unsuccessful attempts to obtain information and documents from Mr. Dershowitz via subpoenas in 2009, 2011, and 2013, noting Dershowitz's response was essentially that he would decide whether to cooperate. The speaker also introduces evidence regarding a telephone call placed by Virginia Roberts from Australia in early April 2011.
This document is a page from a 2017 court filing (House Oversight) containing a reprint of a news article detailing the conflict between the Palm Beach Police and State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the original Epstein investigation. It highlights defense attorneys Alan Dershowitz and Mr. Lefcourt's efforts to discredit accusers using MySpace posts and criminal history, while noting Police Chief Reiter's frustration with the prosecutor's delay in issuing arrest warrants and convening a grand jury.
This document is the final page (page 6) of a sworn declaration by Paul G. Cassell, Esq., filed on July 3, 2019, in the civil case Giuffre v. Maxwell (implied by case number). Cassell asserts that a bar complaint filed by Alan Dershowitz against attorneys Boies and McCawley is frivolous and praises McCawley's devotion to representing sexual abuse victims. The document is notarized in Salt Lake County, Utah, and bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
This document is an affidavit (page 3 of 6) filed in July 2019, detailing how attorneys (the affiant and Mr. Edwards) connected with witness Virginia Roberts Giuffre in 2014 for the CVRA case. It describes a May 2014 interview in Fort Lauderdale where the attorneys determined Giuffre's allegations of sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz were credible. Due to limited resources, the attorneys sought the assistance of David Boies and his firm to handle potential civil lawsuits against Epstein's 'rich and powerful friends'.
This is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021951). The questioning focuses on a flight log showing Alan Dershowitz traveling with a woman named Tatiana. The interrogator questions the witness about Tatiana's age, contrasting the witness's belief that she was '18 or older' with a claim that Dershowitz's wife found on Google that Tatiana was 24. The witness discusses the timeline of flights involving the Dershowitzes and Epstein occurring between 1998 and 2005.
This page is a rough draft of a legal deposition transcript, page 125. The dialogue concerns testimony given by witnesses Rodriguez and Alessi regarding Mr. Dershowitz's presence at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach mansion. The witness states that while Rodriguez testified Dershowitz was at the 'scene of the crime' (defined as the sex abuse of minor girls at the mansion), he did not indicate Dershowitz had direct knowledge of what occurred in the bedroom.
A page from a deposition transcript (marked Rough Draft) where a witness, identified as a former federal prosecutor and district court judge, testifies about the fairness of drawing adverse inferences when subjects like Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz invoke the Fifth Amendment or refuse to answer questions regarding sexual abuse and trafficking allegations made by 'Virginia'. The witness disputes the interviewer's suggestion that it is routine practice for witnesses facing criminal liability to take the Fifth on all substantive questions.
This document is page 118 of a rough draft transcript, likely from a Congressional hearing or deposition (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT). The dialogue concerns a previous deposition where a subject (possibly Mr. Dershowitz or an associate like Epstein) broadly invoked the Fifth Amendment and used tactics to feign ignorance of people he knew. The witness and questioner discuss the legal implications of taking the Fifth in civil litigation within the jurisdiction of the 11th Circuit (Florida), specifically whether one person's invocation can be used as evidence against another.
This document is a rough draft transcript page (115) from a House Oversight proceeding. A speaker details an incident of witness intimidation where a large private investigator hired by Jeffrey Epstein parked outside the Florida home of a witness named 'S.R.' and shone high-beams into her house just days before a trial. The intimidation caused S.R. to flee her home, and the speaker discusses legal motions filed to protect her and concerns regarding communications with Mr. Dershowitz.
This is a page from a rough draft of a deposition transcript (page 106) stamped by the House Oversight Committee. The exchange is between Mr. Simpson (questioner) and Mr. Cassell (witness). Tensions rise as Cassell defends a lengthy answer, stating he was not filibustering but addressing a matter critical to 'Miss Roberts' involving 'sexual abuse.' Simpson apologizes for attempting humor, acknowledging the intensity of the situation, and compares Cassell's conduct to that of Professor Dershowitz.
This is page 105 of a rough draft deposition transcript, likely from a House Oversight investigation. The testimony discusses the potential influence of a person 'fifth in line to the British Throne' over law enforcement in England and the US. The witness confirms relying on information regarding allegations about Virginia Roberts and a 'sex trafficking organization.' The page concludes with attorneys Scarola and Simpson making a comparative remark about Mr. Dershowitz's tendency to give long answers.
This page of a transcript (marked House Oversight) features testimony describing frustration with individuals implicated in a sex trafficking ring evading legal depositions. The speaker specifically details how 'Brunel' (Jean-Luc Brunel) claimed to be unavailable for a deposition while secretly hiding at Jeffrey Epstein's mansion. The testimony also mentions Alan Dershowitz in the context of this pattern of evasion and references a photograph reviewed on December 30th that depicted three people.
This document is a page from a legal transcript (likely a deposition) dated October 2015. The speaker accuses Mr. Dershowitz of employing 'stall tactics' and concealing Jeffrey Epstein from the Palm Beach Police Department to prevent him from answering questions regarding the sexual abuse of girls. The speaker references a pattern of behavior spanning back to 2005/2006.
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript (likely a deposition) bearing a House Oversight bates stamp. An unidentified attorney testifies that, according to the Chief of Police, Alan Dershowitz repeatedly agreed to schedule interviews for his client, Jeffrey Epstein, with the Palm Beach Police Department but never followed through. The witness characterizes this pattern of offers and withdrawals as a 'deliberately calculated strategy' and a 'stall tactic' to impede the investigation.
This document is a rough draft transcript page (likely from a House Oversight investigation) detailing a speaker's frustration with Mr. Dershowitz's failure to respond to legal requests in 2009, 2011, and 2013. The speaker establishes a 'pattern of Mr. Epstein's associates evading efforts' to provide information. It further describes how Dershowitz repeatedly rescheduled promised interviews between the Palm Beach Police Department and Jeffrey Epstein regarding sex abuse allegations.
Production of flight logs which the witness claims were incomplete and inaccurate.
Legal arguments regarding the Stanley decision, hypothetical scenarios about pornography shops, and the effectiveness of warning prologues.
Claimed Epstein's unavailability was 'just a scheduling issue'.
Planning to call Dershowitz to say they are preparing to file a pleading that identifies him.
Mr. Dershowitz met with prosecutors to share information about the accusers, including statements they had posted on MySpace.com concerning drug and alcohol use.
Mr. Dershowitz met with prosecutors to share information about the accusers, including statements they had posted on MySpace.com concerning drug and alcohol use.
Repeated assurances to schedule the interview followed by withdrawals/cancellations
Referenced in the text as the subject of Cassell's defense.
Epstein called Dershowitz, who recommended Roy Black.
Dialogue regarding the film 'I Am Curious Yellow', obscenity laws, and profit motives.
Dershowitz argues that societal offense does not equate to a constitutional right to ban conduct, citing Griswold v. Conn.
Shared information about accusers including MySpace posts regarding drugs and alcohol.
Stated that Virginia is adamant about her current recollection and neither she nor counsel believed she was mistaken.
Dershowitz expressed belief he was making progress convincing Boies that Roberts was mistaken.
Subpoena without deposition for documents. No documents were provided.
Document request that went unanswered.
Subpoena without deposition for documents; no documents were provided.
Stating that multiple witnesses placed Dershowitz in the presence of Epstein and underage girls, and requesting to depose him.
Attempt to get information.
Attempt to get information.
Deposition request that went unanswered.
Deposition request that went unanswered.
Attempt to get information.
Attempt to get information.
A document showing a deposition request had been served on Dershowitz.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity