| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
238
Very Strong
|
470 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Client |
102
Very Strong
|
211 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Client |
75
Very Strong
|
88 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Client |
64
Very Strong
|
183 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
61
Very Strong
|
255 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Judge defendant |
54
Very Strong
|
90 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
49
Very Strong
|
141 | |
|
person
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
|
Client |
48
Very Strong
|
120 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Client |
39
Very Strong
|
43 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirator |
38
Very Strong
|
40 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
37
Very Strong
|
73 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
32
Very Strong
|
72 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Business associate |
30
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Legal representative |
29
Very Strong
|
34 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
29
Very Strong
|
49 | |
|
person
Laura A. Menninger
|
Client |
28
Very Strong
|
79 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
26
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
Mark Cohen
|
Client |
25
Very Strong
|
24 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirator alleged |
24
Very Strong
|
24 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Prosecutor defendant |
24
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
24
Very Strong
|
70 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Client |
24
Very Strong
|
47 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Defendant judge |
24
Very Strong
|
33 | |
|
person
Bobbi Sternheim
|
Client |
22
Very Strong
|
40 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Adversarial |
22
Very Strong
|
33 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, in a prior conversation and questioning abo... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell discusses going to Epstein's houses in Palm Beach and Ohio. She mentions helpin... | Palm Beach, Ohio | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell states that when she and Epstein traveled together, they stayed in the same bed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell states that Epstein told her he had a heart condition. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Business transaction where land with an estate was converted into houses, resulting in profit. Fu... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Transaction involving two Gullwing Mercedes and an Aston Martin, done with 'Mercedes' (the compan... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell mentions writing notes for a meeting. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell discusses being in the SHU in Brooklyn for almost two years and being on suicid... | Brooklyn, SHU | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about various individuals and whether Ghislaine Maxwell knew them in the '90s, includi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Living in a 10x10 foot apartment, while an unnamed individual had a house. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Unnamed individual lived in a house to which Ghislaine Maxwell had no key or free access. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about who was on a plane with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | President Clinton dinner where 'Ted' was present. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Previous statement made by the interlocutor regarding recognizing or thinking about things Epstei... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell stating she 'saw Epstein with women'. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dinner in Hong Kong where Ghislaine Maxwell met Ted Waitt, attended by President Clinton, and Eps... | Hong Kong | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about the nature of a relationship, initially described as 'friends' and 'business par... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discovery process revealing indications that 'he' (unspecified) would tell others to lie to Ghisl... | unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell's belief that a situation was used to prevent her from traveling with 'him' to ... | Ohio (destination) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's involvement in an investigation and contact with law enf... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | First visit to Epstein's Palm Beach mansion | El Brillo Way, Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about a specific woman 'he' saw the most during a certain period, who was in her 40s a... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage incident involving Ghislaine Maxwell and A. Farmer. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Social gathering or dinner event | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conspiracy activities involving scheduling massages | The house | View |
This document is a compilation of FBI internal memos, administrative forms, and news clippings related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein between 2006 and 2011. It covers the FBI's monitoring of the state case, the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement, victim notification procedures, and the prosecution of Epstein's butler, Alfredo Rodriguez, for obstruction of justice. Significant portions include news articles detailing allegations by Virginia Roberts regarding Prince Andrew and the operations of the MC2 modeling agency.
This document contains FBI administrative records and a significant collection of newspaper clippings regarding the 2005-2006 Palm Beach Police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It includes an FBI request to open a child prostitution case in July 2006, a redacted probable cause affidavit mentioning a houseman's testimony, and subpoenas for a Grand Jury. The bulk of the content comes from Palm Beach Post articles detailing the friction between the police and the State Attorney's office, the recruitment of underage girls by Haley Robson, and Epstein's high-profile connections.
This document is a Proffer Agreement dated July 24, 2025, between Ghislaine Maxwell (represented by attorney David Oscar Markus) and the United States Government (represented by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche). The agreement outlines the terms for a meeting in Tallahassee, Florida, stipulating that statements made by Maxwell generally cannot be used against her in the government's case-in-chief but can be used for leads or impeachment. It explicitly states this is not a cooperation agreement.
This document is a transcript of a proffer interview with Ghislaine Maxwell conducted by the DOJ and FBI on July 25, 2025. Maxwell discusses her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, denies participating in or witnessing sexual abuse of minors, and details her interactions with high-profile figures like Bill Clinton and Elon Musk. She addresses financial transactions, flight logs, and specific allegations regarding recruitment of women for Epstein.
This document is a transcript of an interview, or 'proffer,' of Ghislaine Maxwell conducted by the United States Department of Justice on July 24, 2025. The interview involves legal counsel for Maxwell and various US government representatives, primarily focusing on the terms and conditions of a proffer agreement, emphasizing that it is not a cooperation agreement and outlines the immunity and exceptions related to false statements.
This document is a heavily redacted version of Jeffrey Epstein's 'Black Book' (contact list) from approximately 2004-2005. It contains an alphabetical listing of high-profile individuals, politicians, celebrities, and business associates, along with sections for specific locations (Palm Beach, NY, Paris, etc.) and services (Massage, Medical, Aviation). The final page contains significant handwritten notes identifying key witnesses, staff members (chefs, drivers), and specific allegations regarding the procurement of women ('Scout for young females') and interactions with underage girls.
This document contains a plea agreement for Jeffrey E. Epstein, detailing charges of felony solicitation of prostitution and procuring a person under 18 for prostitution, along with his sentence and conditions. It also includes several handwritten message slips, some addressed to 'Mr. Epstein' or 'Jeffrey' and others to 'Mr. Maxwell' or 'Ghislaine Maxwell', containing phone numbers and short messages.
This document contains a sworn statement from Juan P. Alessi dated November 21, 2005, detailing his experiences working for Jeffrey Epstein, particularly focusing on Ghislaine Maxwell's role as manager of Epstein's global households and his girlfriend. It also includes a letter from the Town of Palm Beach Police Department Chief Michael S. Reiter to State Attorney Barry E. Krischer dated May 1, 2006, transmitting investigation documents related to Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Haley Robson, and expressing strong concerns about the State Attorney's office's handling of the cases.
This document is a compilation of legal filings from late 2020 to early 2021 concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's repeated attempts to secure release on bail pending her trial for sex trafficking conspiracy. It includes the Government's opposition detailing her flight risk, wealth, and foreign ties (specifically to France and the UK), a victim statement from Annie Farmer, correspondence from the French Ministry of Justice confirming they do not extradite nationals, and Judge Nathan's orders denying bail. The documents highlight Maxwell's offer to renounce her foreign citizenships and pledge significant assets, all of which the Court found insufficient to assure her appearance.
This document consists of a Docketing Notice from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals dated July 8, 2022, for the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), and a Notice of Appeal and Criminal Docket from the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed July 7, 2022. It details Maxwell's conviction and sentencing, including multi-year imprisonment terms and a $750,000 fine for charges related to conspiracy to entice minors for illegal sex acts, transport minors for sexual activity, and sex trafficking, with some counts dismissed or deemed multiplicitous.
This document is the Government's Memorandum in Opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's Renewed Motion for Release on bail, filed on April 1, 2021. It argues against her release, citing a previous court finding from July 2020 that she posed a serious flight risk and that no bail conditions could ensure her appearance, a conclusion the Government maintains is still valid due to the seriousness of the offense, strong evidence, and her extensive financial resources and foreign ties.
This document is the complete appellate record for case 20-3061, an interlocutory appeal by Ghislaine Maxwell against the United States. Maxwell appealed a District Court order denying her motion to modify a protective order, seeking permission to share confidential criminal discovery materials under seal with the judge in a related civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell) to challenge the government's acquisition of evidence. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, ruling that the protective order decision was not a final judgment or an appealable collateral order, and denied Maxwell's motion to consolidate the criminal appeal with the civil appeal.
This document is a formal 'Appearance of Counsel' filed on July 6, 2020, in the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire (Case No. 20-cr-330). Attorney Lawrence A. Vogelman notifies the court and parties that he is representing the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. The document includes a Certificate of Service confirming electronic service to all counsel of record.
This document is a 'Commitment to Another District' order filed on July 2, 2020, in the District of New Hampshire regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists serious criminal charges against her including conspiracy to entice/transport minors for illegal sex acts and perjury, originating from the Southern District of New York. Judge Andrea K. Johnstone orders the U.S. Marshal to transport Maxwell to the charging district (SDNY).
This document is a court order titled 'Public Access Findings' filed on July 2, 2020, in the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Andrea K. Johnstone rules that the initial appearance and removal hearing will be conducted via video and telephone conference due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The order justifies this 'partial closure' of the court as necessary to protect public health while maintaining public access through telephonic means.
This document is a legal memo endorsed by Judge Richard M. Berman on August 5, 2025, filed by the law firm Edwards Henderson on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein's victims. The attorneys request specific safeguards, including conferral, in-camera review, and pre-release review, before the unsealing of grand jury materials to ensure compliance with the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). They argue that the Department of Justice failed to properly notify victims before seeking to unseal these materials, raising concerns about the privacy and safety of the survivors.
This document is a Government Memorandum filed on July 29, 2025, in the Southern District of New York, responding to Court Orders regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in the Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell cases. The Government supports the disclosure of these transcripts due to significant public interest, noting that Epstein is deceased and Maxwell is incarcerated, but requests redactions to protect victim identities. The memo analyzes the 'In re Craig' factors for unsealing grand jury records and confirms that the key law enforcement witnesses are still active.
This document is a motion filed on July 18, 2025, by U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi and Deputy AG Todd Blanche, requesting the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York to unseal grand jury transcripts related to Jeffrey Epstein. The motion follows a July 6, 2025, DOJ/FBI memorandum that concluded a review of Epstein's case found no evidence to predicate investigations into uncharged third parties. Citing significant public interest and historical importance, the government argues for transparency while ensuring victim identities remain redacted.
This document is a Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law opposing a motion to dismiss a derivative lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase's board regarding their oversight of Jeffrey Epstein. It alleges that the Board, including CEO Jamie Dimon, ignored red flags about Epstein's sex trafficking and financial crimes (such as massive cash withdrawals) to retain him as a client, failed to implement required BSA/AML monitoring systems, and violated a Deferred Prosecution Agreement related to Madoff. The plaintiffs argue that demand on the board is excused because a majority of directors face liability or lack independence.
This document is an Affidavit of Service dated July 28, 2025, filed in the U.S. Supreme Court case (No. 24-1073) of Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States of America. It certifies that Robyn Dorsey Willis of Wilson-Epes Printing Co. served three copies of Maxwell's 'Reply in Support of Petition for Writ of Certiorari' to Solicitor General D. John Sauer at the Department of Justice. Electronic copies were also sent to the DOJ and David Markus (Maxwell's attorney).
This document is a legal reply brief filed in the Supreme Court on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell (Petitioner) against the United States, dated July 28, 2025. The brief argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed by Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida, which promised not to prosecute 'potential co-conspirators' in 'the United States,' should legally bind other districts like the Southern District of New York. The filing highlights a circuit split on whether US Attorneys can bind other districts and contends that the Second Circuit's decision allowing Maxwell's prosecution violates contract law and the plain text of the agreement.
This document is a Certificate of Service filed in the Supreme Court case No. 24-1073, Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States of America, dated July 14, 2025. It certifies that the Solicitor General, D. John Sauer, served the 'Brief for the United States in Opposition' to Maxwell's attorneys, Sara Kropf and David Oscar Markus. The document also includes administrative instructions regarding mail delays at the DOJ and contact information for case management.
This document is a legal brief filed by the United States Solicitor General in July 2025 opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court. The government argues that the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed by Jeffrey Epstein in Florida does not bar the Southern District of New York from prosecuting Maxwell, as the agreement was contractually limited to the Florida district and Maxwell was not a party to it. The brief details the history of the Epstein investigation, the terms of the NPA, and relevant legal precedents regarding the scope of plea agreements binding different US Attorney's Offices.
This document is a formal request dated June 6, 2025, from Solicitor General D. John Sauer to the Supreme Court Clerk regarding the case Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States (No. 24-1073). The government requests a 30-day extension (until July 14, 2025) to file their response to Maxwell's petition for a writ of certiorari, citing heavy attorney workload. The document notes that Maxwell's counsel (identified in the attached service list as Sara Kropf and David Oscar Markus) does not oppose the extension.
This document is an Affidavit of Service filed in the Supreme Court case (No. 24-1073) of Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States. Rina Danielson certifies that on May 9, 2025, she served the 'Brief of Amicus Curiae National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Petitioner' to attorneys for both Maxwell (David Oscar Markus) and the United States (Solicitor General D. John Sauer). The service was performed via Priority Mail and email, with physical copies also sent to the Court via Federal Express.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-08 | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | MDC Commissary | $0.00 | Purchase of supplemental food items including g... | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Pretrial Services | $3,500,000.00 | Assets reported by Maxwell to Pretrial Services... | View |
| 2020-07-10 | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court | $3,750,000.00 | Value of real property in the UK offered as sec... | View |
| 2020-07-10 | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court | $3,750,000.00 | Value of real property in the UK proposed as se... | View |
| 2020-07-01 | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Defense counsel | $7,000,000.00 | Retainer paid to attorneys mentioned in governm... | View |
| 2020-06-30 | Received | UBS | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Analysis of Maxwell's related accounts held at/... | View |
| 2020-06-30 | Received | UBS | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $59,039.62 | Total account value as of June 30, 2020 | View |
| 2020-06-30 | Received | Calvert Investments | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $8.98 | YTD Dividend and interest income (Jan-Jun 2020) | View |
| 2020-01-31 | Received | Calvert Investments | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $2.64 | Dividend and interest income for January 2020 | View |
| 2020-01-31 | Received | UBS | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $59,033.28 | Total account value as of January 31, 2020 | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | THE COURT | $22,500,000.00 | Proposed bond amount representing all of the co... | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | N/A | $3,500,000.00 | Self-reported asset value to Pretrial Services ... | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Pretrial Services | $0.00 | Representations made regarding finances which t... | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | N/A (Asset Valuat... | $3,500,000.00 | Value of assets Maxwell represented she possess... | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Pretrial Services... | $3,500,000.00 | Defendant represented she possessed around $3.5... | View |
| 2019-11-08 | Received | JPMorgan Chase & ... | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Confirmation of three JPMC accounts for Maxwell... | View |
| 2019-08-18 | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Debbie - AmEx | $102,243.00 | Open AMEX account with balance of $102,243. Hig... | View |
| 2019-08-15 | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | CapitalOne/SAKS | $0.00 | Credit card had a zero balance as of this date. | View |
| 2019-08-15 | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | CAP1/SAKS | $31.00 | Credit account with $31 balance. Credit limit $... | View |
| 2019-07-25 | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | UBS | $0.00 | Closed account at grantor's request. High credi... | View |
| 2019-07-19 | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | US | $22,307.00 | Credit account with balance of $22,307. Credit ... | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | CapitalOne/SAKS | $0.00 | Last payment made on the card. | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Scott Borgerson | $0.00 | Joint bank account shared between Maxwell and B... | View |
| 2017-01-01 | Received | Cater Allen Priva... | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $2,671,835.00 | Maximum value of foreign financial account | View |
| 2017-01-01 | Received | Wealth At Work Li... | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $675,676.00 | Maximum value of foreign pension fund | View |
Defendant's claims about her finances.
Confidential communications compromised by guard proximity, camera repositioning, and sensitive audio recording.
Talking about school and then about boyfriends and sex.
Carolyn told Maxwell about her previous sexual abuse by family members.
Witness questioned on whether Maxwell's instructions originated from Epstein.
The witness confirms Maxwell did NOT say anything or ask about the hand holding after the movie.
Alerted her that the press was on the grounds and approaching the house (actually FBI).
Audio recording mentioned as potentially being released
Maxwell showed up at Bloomingdales to find the speaker and began befriending them again.
Maxwell asked colleagues at Henri Bendel where the speaker was working.
Called to schedule appointments
The document references the defendant's deposition testimony which the government claims contains false statements (perjury).
Maxwell would call and set up appointment times.
Psychologist informed Maxwell she was being placed on suicide watch despite the psychologist's opposition, stating directives came from Washington, DC.
Writing regularly whilst she has been in prison.
Maxwell stayed in contact with the government, potentially to stave off indictment.
Discussed fashion, fathers, formal upbringings, boyfriends, and New York.
Message: 'Called to say Hi!'. Time: 1:00 P.M.
Document claims her ability to communicate effectively with counsel is impaired.
Lied about the sisters and threatened Maria.
Discussion about whether Ghislaine could call to request the helicopter on her own (Witness stated this wasn't the normal situation).
Calling victims and arranging for massage appointments.
Statement describing recruitment at Mar-a-Lago, subsequent abuse, and Maxwell's role as the 'door to hell' and 'wolf in sheep's clothing'.
Maxwell invited Kate to the island and asked her to massage Jeffrey.
Allegation that Maxwell 'got on the phone and somehow arranged for Jane to get back to Palm Beach'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity