| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Chamath Palihapitiya
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Peter Thiel
|
Board member |
5
|
1 |
This is the final signature page (page 17 of 17) of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The page contains proposed jury instructions (Paragraph 67) regarding the prohibition of electronic communications and social media usage by jurors during the trial. It is signed by the prosecution team (US Attorney's Office) and the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 11, 2021.
This document is page 14 of a juror questionnaire from legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. The questionnaire probes a potential juror's media consumption habits, social media usage, viewership of crime-related content, and their opinion on the trustworthiness of the media.
This document is a jury instruction sheet for the criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on October 22, 2021. It summarizes the six-count indictment against Maxwell, which alleges she conspired with and aided Jeffrey Epstein in sex trafficking of minors between 1994 and 2004. The document provides strict instructions to potential jurors, prohibiting them from conducting outside research or discussing the case, and notes the trial is set to begin on November 29, 2021.
This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on October 22, 2021, containing instructions to the jury pool. The text outlines strict prohibitions against jurors discussing the case on social media or conducting independent research via Google or news outlets. It also details privacy and safety measures due to the 'high-profile' nature of the case and COVID-19, including the use of juror numbers instead of names and the provision of daily transportation for jurors.
This document, a page from a legal filing, discusses the challenges in legally defining and prosecuting sexual grooming. It examines various legal approaches in the United States, United Kingdom, Wales, and New Zealand, highlighting the difficulties in establishing a clear, measurable definition of grooming behavior. The text cites several academic sources and specific legal cases to illustrate the varied and often limited nature of laws designed to prevent this form of abuse.
This document is Page 4 of 40 from a court filing (Document 365) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 22, 2021. It contains preliminary instructions for prospective jurors regarding a questionnaire, emphasizing the legal requirement to provide truthful answers under oath. The text explicitly prohibits jurors from discussing the case with anyone, using social media (citing Facebook and Twitter) to communicate about it, or conducting independent research.
This document is a legal instruction (Instruction No. 3) for a jury in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 19, 2021. It strictly prohibits jurors from communicating about the case with anyone or conducting outside research using any electronic devices, the internet, or social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter. The instruction emphasizes that jurors must base their verdict solely on evidence presented in the courtroom and may only discuss the case with fellow jurors in the jury room during deliberations.
This document is page 21 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It contains instructions from the Judge to the jury regarding their conduct, specifically forbidding them from discussing the case with one another or outside parties until deliberations begin. The text explicitly lists various communication technologies and social media platforms (Facebook, Reddit, Twitter, etc.) that jurors are prohibited from using to discuss the trial.
This document appears to be page 298 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by Edward Jay Epstein, indicated by the filename 'Epst_...'). It details the operational fallout of the Edward Snowden leaks, specifically how terrorist targets using platforms like Xbox Live, Twitter, and Facebook ceased using these methods ('went dark') after the PRISM program was revealed in June 2013. The text cites NSA officials Richard Ledgett and Admiral Rogers confirming that the leaks resulted in a loss of surveillance capabilities against groups planning attacks in Europe and the US.
This document is page 212 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by Edward Jay Epstein), produced as evidence with the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019700. The text discusses historical espionage, specifically the arrest of Jerry Whitworth, KGB 'false flag' recruitment of the German Hanover Hackers in the 1980s, and the NSA's increasing reliance on private contractors like Booz Allen Hamilton for IT talent due to competition with tech giants like Google and Apple. The filename 'Epst_' refers to the author Edward Jay Epstein, not Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is page 121 from a book (titled 'The Great Divide' in the header, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein based on context and file metadata) included in a House Oversight production. The text discusses the erosion of privacy through government subpoenas to private companies like Facebook and Apple, citing the 2011 investigation of Dominique Strauss-Kahn by Cyrus Vance Jr. and data mining by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau as examples. While part of the Epstein document production (indicated by file name and Bates stamp), this specific page focuses on general privacy issues and the Strauss-Kahn case rather than Jeffrey Epstein directly.
This page from the book "How America Lost Its Secrets" discusses the significant erosion of personal privacy due to modern technology and digital services. It details how entities like phone companies, Google, social media platforms, and credit card companies collect vast amounts of surveillance data and metadata for profit, rendering the concept of privacy largely illusory.
This document is page 101 of a book (likely titled 'The Plot to Hack America' or similar based on context and ISBN in footer) produced as part of a House Oversight investigation. It details Julian Assange's involvement in Edward Snowden's flight to Russia, specifically noting Assange's advice to avoid Ecuador in favor of Russia and his deployment of WikiLeaks staffer Sarah Harrison to Hong Kong to assist Snowden. It also provides background on Harrison's family connections in Hong Kong and her operational security measures.
The document is a news digest containing two articles. The first discusses the boom in U.S. oil transportation, highlighting the shift from pipelines to rail and barge, regulatory challenges in Washington state, and safety concerns following the Lac-Mégantic rail disaster in Quebec. The second article summarizes a scientific study published in Nature regarding the vulnerability of the U.S. electrical grid. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a production related to an investigation.
This document, authored by Benjamin Harnwell of the Dignitatis Humanae Institute, outlines the objectives of Steve Bannon's organization, 'The Movement,' in the lead-up to the Spring 2019 European elections. It details Bannon's intent to create a populist right-wing alliance to rival George Soros's influence, citing connections to European leaders like Orbán, Le Pen, and Farage, as well as his past involvement with Cambridge Analytica and Donald Trump. The text also notes Bannon's strained relationship with Trump following the publication of 'Fire and Fury' and his shift in focus toward influencing European politics.
This document is an email chain involving Steve Bannon and Benjamin Harnwell (Dignitatis Humanae Institute). Bannon asks Harnwell to translate or explain a text that discusses Bannon's political activities in Europe, his 'The Movement' organization, his strained relationship with Donald Trump, and his connections to European nationalist figures like Nigel Farage and Marine Le Pen. The text characterizes Bannon's shift toward European politics as a 'reign in Hell' strategy following his fallout with the Trump administration.
This document is an email exchange between Steve Bannon and Benjamin Harnwell dated July 22, 2018. Bannon asks Harnwell to translate or explain a text, which Harnwell provides in the reply. The text discusses Bannon's political activities in Europe with 'The Movement,' his connections to nationalist leaders like Orbán and Le Pen, and his strained relationship with Donald Trump following the publication of 'Fire and Fury.' It bears a House Oversight stamp.
An email thread from July 2018 involving Steve Bannon and Benjamin Harnwell. Harnwell sends Bannon a text (likely a translated news article) detailing Bannon's plans to launch a foundation called 'The Movement' in Brussels to unite European right-wing populists against George Soros ahead of the 2019 elections. Bannon replies to the thread with the phrase '9th circle,' likely a reference to Dante's Inferno.
This document appears to be a text excerpt or memo sent by Benjamin Harnwell of the Dignitatis Humanae Institute, found within House Oversight Committee records. It details the strategies of Steve Bannon's organization, 'The Movement,' aiming to unite right-wing populist parties across Europe (including Lega, 5 Stars, and leaders like Orbán and Le Pen) ahead of the 2019 European Parliament elections. It references Bannon's past with Cambridge Analytica, his strained relationship with Donald Trump following the publication of 'Fire and Fury,' and his intention to focus efforts on Europe.
This document is an email chain from July 2018 found in House Oversight files. Steve Bannon forwards an email he received from Benjamin Harnwell to Jeffrey Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com). The content is the text of a news article detailing Bannon's plans to launch 'The Movement' in Brussels to unite right-wing populist leaders in Europe to compete against George Soros and influence the 2019 European elections.
A Washington Post article dated December 28 (likely 2016) reporting on President-elect Donald Trump's meetings with industry leaders. The article specifically details a meeting at Mar-a-Lago with major healthcare executives including the CEOs of Mayo Clinic, Johns Hopkins, Partners HealthCare, and Cleveland Clinic to discuss the Affordable Care Act. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp.
This document appears to be the final page or a discussion guide section of an ebook distributed via Smashwords. It contains discussion questions regarding identity and binaries, followed by an 'About The Author' biography for Clarisse Thorn, a sex-positive educator and writer. The document includes a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp (018684), suggesting it was included in a larger document production, though the text itself does not directly mention Epstein.
This document appears to be a printout of an internet article or blog post, bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp (018572). It contains a first-person narrative by a woman named Clarisse recounting a past event where an acquaintance named Lena intervened during a party to help her establish sexual boundaries with a man. The text focuses on the importance of consent, support among women, and the narrator's gratitude for Lena's intervention.
This document is a printout of an email forwarded to Jeffrey Epstein (address jeevacation@gmail.com) on August 2, 2012. The email contains a Thomas L. Friedman opinion piece titled 'Why Not in Vegas?' which criticizes Mitt Romney's visit to Israel as a fundraising effort to please donor Sheldon Adelson. The sender is redacted, but marked the email as 'High' importance.
This is an email chain from November 11, 2016, between Zubair Khan and Jeffrey Epstein regarding the accuracy of a data prediction model used for the 2016 US Presidential Election. Khan explains the model's success and failures (specifically regarding NY and WI) and informs Epstein that he must shut down the project due to the high cost of Twitter data and lack of funds. Khan indicates he will return to cyber security and contact Epstein later regarding future investment opportunities.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity