Inspector General
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
OGIS
|
Oversight |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | State Department interference with IG Investigation on sexual misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2020-01-13 | N/A | Conference call with Inspector General regarding the start of the report on the Epstein case. | N/A | View |
| 2019-08-11 | N/A | FBI and Inspector General onsite conducting investigations. | BOP Facility | View |
| 2019-08-10 | N/A | FBI and Inspector General Investigation | Onsite at facility | View |
| 2012-09-11 | N/A | The Inspector General at NARA releases a report on OGIS | Unspecified | View |
EFTA00035053.pdf
This document is an email chain initiated by a Supervisory Staff Attorney at the MCC on August 12, 2019. It forwards a detailed legal request from Jeffrey Epstein's family (dated August 11, 2019) demanding the preservation of all evidence—including video footage, logs, and medical records—related to Epstein's detention, his July 23 attempted suicide, and his death on August 10. The chain also includes the initial August 10 notification of Epstein's passing.
EFTA00029742.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), the DOJ Office of the Inspector General (OIG), and implied recipients at the FBI and SDNY, dated January 8-14, 2020. The correspondence concerns the initiation of a 'Board of Inquiry' to review operations at MCC New York following Jeffrey Epstein's death, specifically examining camera operations, staffing, and special housing policies. A key focus of the OIG report mentioned is the investigation into why Epstein was not assigned a new cellmate after the departure of inmate Reyes.
EFTA00028723.pdf
This document is U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons Program Statement 1210.21, dated March 9, 2000, signed by Director Kathleen Hawk Sawyer. It establishes the policies and procedures for creating and operating Boards of Inquiry and Inquiry Teams to investigate incidents, specifically those involving employee misconduct or significant policy breaches. The document details the hierarchy for appointing these teams, the role of the Office of Internal Affairs, legal rights of employees during questioning (including Miranda and union rights), and the protocols for reporting and releasing findings.
DOJ-OGR-00022103.jpg
This document is page 7 of a court order filed on June 9, 2020, in the case of United States v. Thomas (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT). The Court denies the defendant's (Thomas) motion to compel disclosure of the Inspector General's report regarding Epstein's death because the report did not exist at the time. Furthermore, the Court rules that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is not considered part of the 'prosecution team' for discovery purposes (Rule 16 and Brady), as there is no evidence BOP officials participated in the criminal investigation leading to Thomas' indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00022089.jpg
This page is from a legal filing (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) dated April 24, 2020, arguing against a motion by defendant Thomas (likely Michael Thomas, a guard involved in the Epstein case) to disclose draft versions of an Inspector General's Report regarding the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The text argues that such drafts do not yet exist and, even if they did, would be protected by the 'deliberative process privilege.' The document cites numerous legal precedents to support the claim that pre-decisional government documents are shielded from discovery.
DOJ-OGR-00022037.jpg
This document is page 14 of a legal defense filing (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) dated April 9, 2020, regarding charges against prison guards Michael Thomas and Tova Noel. The defense argues that while Thomas is charged with falsifying logs, other supervisors who approved these logs were not charged, and points to severe staffing shortages in the SHU. The filing seeks disclosure of the Inspector General's report, arguing it is material to the defense to prove systemic failures beyond the defendants' actions.
DOJ-OGR-00022032.jpg
This document is page 9 of a legal filing (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) dated April 9, 2020, concerning defendant Michael Thomas (one of the guards charged in the Epstein case). The defense argues for the full disclosure of the Inspector General's report, suggesting that systemic failures within the Bureau of Prisons (BOP)—such as 3,300 vacancies and overworked staff—contributed to Epstein's death on August 10, 2019, rather than solely the actions of the defendant. It references testimony by Acting Commissioner Kathleen Hawks Sawyer regarding these staffing issues.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026479.jpg
This document appears to be an excerpt from a legal argument or opinion piece included in House Oversight Committee files (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026479). It argues that the Mueller investigation is invalid ('fruit of a poisonous tree') because it stemmed from the 'Crossfire' investigation, which the author claims was politically motivated to help Hillary Clinton and hurt Donald Trump. The text cites several Supreme Court cases (U.S. v. Russell, Blackledge v. Perry, Young v. U.S., Williams v. Pennsylvania) to argue that due process is violated when prosecutorial efforts are motivated by bias or vindictiveness. **Note:** While the user prompt asks for 'Epstein-related' analysis, this specific page contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein; it focuses exclusively on the Trump-Russia investigation and FBI conduct.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027719.jpg
This document is a forensic extraction log of digital messages from May 22, 2019. It records a conversation involving an account associated with Jeffrey Epstein (jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation touches on political topics, specifically referencing an Inspector General report and Attorney General William Barr targeting intelligence chiefs.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025864.jpg
This page contains a timeline for the year 2012 regarding the activities of the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS). It details milestones such as opening their 1,000th case, the launch of the FOIAonline portal, and various presentations by staff. It appears to be part of a larger House Oversight Committee document (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025864) reviewing government transparency and records administration.
Inspector General's report
Report regarding issues at the facility which the defense argues is material to their case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity