SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LocationRelationship Network
026.pdf
This document is a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 17, 2019, in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Richard M. Berman ordered the rescheduling of a conference from 9:30 am to 11:30 am on July 18, 2019.
023.pdf
This July 16, 2019 letter from the DOJ to Judge Berman provides supplemental information for Jeffrey Epstein's detention hearing. It details suspicious wire transfers totaling $350,000 to two potential co-conspirators shortly after the release of Miami Herald articles in late 2018. The letter also reveals the seizure of a foreign passport with Epstein's photo but a false name, as well as over $70,000 in cash and 48 loose diamonds found in his Manhattan safe, arguing these facts support a serious risk of flight.
021.pdf
This document is a Notice of Filing of Official Transcript filed on July 16, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding the case USA v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 19CR490). The notice informs parties that a transcript of a conference held on July 8, 2019, has been filed by court reporter Kristen Carranante. It outlines the procedures and deadlines for requesting redactions of personal data identifiers from the transcript before it becomes publicly available.
019.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Filing of Official Transcript' filed on July 16, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 19CR490). It announces that the transcript for a conference held on July 8, 2019, has been filed by Court Reporter Thomas Murray and outlines the deadlines and procedures for parties to request redactions of personal data identifiers before the transcript becomes publicly available.
018.pdf
This document is a transcript of a court conference held on July 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York regarding the case U.S. v. Jeffrey Epstein. The proceedings cover the scheduling of bail hearings, the government's confirmation of its obligation to notify victims, and preliminary arguments regarding the 2007/2008 Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The defense argues the NPA bars this prosecution, while the government asserts the NPA does not bind the Southern District of New York and that the current indictment involves separate conduct and victims.
017.pdf
This document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 16, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Richard M. Berman grants the motion for attorney Martin G. Weinberg to be admitted Pro Hac Vice to serve as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. The document lists Weinberg's contact information in Boston, Massachusetts.
013-03.pdf
This document is an affidavit dated July 15, 2019, filed by attorney Martin G. Weinberg in the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (19-CR-490). Weinberg affirms his clean legal record (no felonies, censures, or pending disciplinary proceedings) in support of a motion to be admitted pro hac vice to represent Epstein in the Southern District of New York.
013-02.pdf
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York filed on July 15, 2019, in the case of USA v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Richard M. Berman grants the motion for attorney Martin G. Weinberg to appear Pro Hac Vice as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. The document lists Weinberg's contact information in Boston, MA.
012-02.pdf
This document is a court order filed on July 15, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, granting attorney Martin G. Weinberg's motion to be admitted Pro Hac Vice. This admission allows Weinberg, a Massachusetts-based attorney, to serve as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, in criminal case No. 19 Cr 490 under Judge Richard M. Berman.
003.pdf
This document is an Unsealing Order filed on July 8, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cr-00490). Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman, the order grants the application made by U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman (via AUSA Alex Rossmiller) to unseal the indictment against defendant Jeffrey Epstein.
043.pdf
This document is a formal Judgment from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dated January 12, 2024. It dismisses with prejudice the lawsuit (Case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR) filed by pension funds against James Dimon, James Staley, and other JPMorgan board members/executives. The court ruled that despite amended complaints and additional allegations, the case must be closed.
040.pdf
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York dated November 7, 2023, granting attorney John McNichols of Williams & Connolly LLP admission *pro hac vice* to represent defendant James Edward Staley. The case involves the Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund against JPMorgan Chase & Co. and several individual defendants, including James Dimon and James Staley.
037-01.pdf
This document is a declaration filed on August 8, 2023, by attorney Christopher J. Orrico of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. requesting admission pro hac vice in the JP Morgan Chase & Co. Derivative Litigation (Case No. 1:23-CV-03903). Orrico attests to his good standing in New York and Connecticut and confirms he has no criminal or disciplinary record. He represents the Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund in this matter.
036.pdf
This document is an 'Appearance of Counsel' form filed on August 1, 2023, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 23-cv-03903-JSR). Attorney Andrew Blumberg of Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP enters his appearance to represent the 'City of Miami General Employees & Sanitation Employees Retirement Trust' in the case of Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund v. James Dimon, et al. This case is part of the shareholder derivative litigation against JPMorgan executives regarding their relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
033.pdf
Legal form 'Appearance of Counsel' filed on July 27, 2023, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR). Attorney Jeroen van Kwawegen of Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP enters his appearance representing the plaintiff, City of Miami General Employees & Sanitation Employees Retirement Trust. The case involves defendants including James Dimon, James E. Staley, and other JPMorgan board members, relating to shareholder derivative litigation concerning the bank's ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
028.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on July 6, 2023, by attorneys for James E. Staley in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It requests the dismissal of an amended stockholder derivative complaint involving JPMorgan Chase & Co. The filing outlines the legal basis (Rules 12(b)(6) and 23.1(b)) and sets the schedule for subsequent responses and replies.
026-01.pdf
This document is Exhibit 1 filed in the case USVI v. JPMorgan Chase (related to Jeffrey Epstein), but the content is the January 2014 Deferred Prosecution Agreement between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and JPMorgan Chase regarding the Madoff Ponzi scheme. JPMorgan admitted to violations of the Bank Secrecy Act, specifically failing to maintain an effective anti-money laundering program and failing to file a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) in the U.S. despite having suspicions about Madoff's returns. The bank agreed to forfeit $1.7 billion to the United States.
025.pdf
This document is a Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the derivative litigation against JP Morgan Chase & Co. It outlines arguments regarding pleading standards, demand futility, and failure to state claims against the defendants, including specific points related to JPMorgan's termination of Epstein as a client and the oversight of internal controls by the board of directors. The document includes a table of authorities citing numerous legal cases.
019-05.pdf
A proposed court order filed on June 30, 2023, in the Southern District of New York, granting attorney John McNichols of Williams & Connolly LLP admission *pro hac vice* to represent defendant James Edward Staley. The underlying case involves a lawsuit by the Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund against JPMorgan Chase executives, including Jamie Dimon and Mary Erdoes.
016.pdf
This document is a Civil Case Management Plan filed on June 27, 2023, in the Southern District of New York for the case 'Operating Engineers Construction Industry... v. James Dimon, et al.' (Case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR). It outlines the scheduling order for the lawsuit brought by shareholders against JPMorgan's board of directors and executives (including Jes Staley) regarding the bank's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The plan sets deadlines for motions to dismiss (July 2023), discovery completion (November 2023), and summary judgment motions (late 2023/early 2024), with a trial readiness date set for January 19, 2024. Handwritten notes by Judge Rakoff modify several specific deadlines.
012.pdf
This document is a formal Appearance of Counsel filed on June 21, 2023, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:23-cv-03903-JSR). Attorney Timothy Perla of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP submits this form to officially represent the defendants—JPMorgan Chase & Co., James Dimon, Ashley Bacon, Mary Callahan Erdoes, John Hogan, and Barry Zubrow—in a lawsuit brought by the Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund.
010.pdf
This document is a Notice of Court Conference and a Civil Case Management Plan template from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on June 21, 2023. It concerns the case of Operating Engineers v. Dimon (Case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR). Judge Jed S. Rakoff orders a telephonic conference for June 26, 2023, and sets a strict deadline for the case to be ready for trial by November 27, 2023.
006.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on June 6, 2023, in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Michael J. Barry of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. seeks permission to represent the plaintiff, Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund, in a lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase & Co. and various individual defendants, including James Dimon and James E. Staley.
006-01.pdf
This document is a legal declaration filed on June 6, 2023, by attorney Michael J. Barry of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. He is applying for admission pro hac vice (to practice in this specific case) in the Southern District of New York. The case (1:23-cv-03903) involves the Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund as plaintiff against numerous JPMorgan Chase & Co. executives and board members, including James Dimon and James 'Jes' Staley, likely regarding a shareholder derivative suit related to the bank's ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
005-01.pdf
This document is a declaration filed on June 6, 2023, by attorney Christine M. Mackintosh of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. seeking admission pro hac vice in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The filing is part of a shareholder derivative lawsuit (Case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR) brought by the Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund against JPMorgan Chase executives, including James Dimon and James E. Staley, regarding the bank's oversight.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity