Andy
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GM
|
Fellow travelers |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JE
|
Fellow travelers |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lefcourt
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Partner at Hughes Hubbard & Reed]
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JG
|
Traveled together |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, and Lara Pomerantz (USA)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED] (Complainant)
|
Recruiter victim |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Information sharing |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Marc A. Weinstein
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Meeting involving Acosta, Menchel, Marie, and Andy | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Andy drove by complainant's residence asking if law enforcement was looking for him, claiming con... | Virginia Beach, VA | View |
| N/A | N/A | Villafaña circulates the defense's proposed plea agreement to supervisors. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Meeting | A meeting was held to discuss policy reasons for not prosecuting Epstein. | N/A | View |
| 2021-04-05 | N/A | Scheduled conference call between SDNY and Epstein Estate attorneys (Marc Weinstein/Andy). | Conference Line | View |
| 2000-01-01 | N/A | Sexual encounter/assault where complainant, aged 15, gave a massage and was sexually assaulted by... | Virginia Beach, VA | View |
| 1998-03-27 | Flight | Flight from SAF to PBI. | SAF to PBI | View |
| 1998-03-25 | Flight | Flight from TEB to SAF. | TEB to SAF | View |
| 1997-02-13 | Flight | Flight 945 from TEB to PBI. | Between TEB and PBI | View |
| 1995-04-29 | N/A | Flight 689 | NEW to PBI | View |
| 1995-04-29 | N/A | Flight 688 | SAF to NEW | View |
| 1995-04-27 | N/A | Flight 687 | TEB to SAF | View |
| 1995-04-16 | N/A | Flight 684 | PBI to TEB | View |
| 1995-04-13 | N/A | Flight 683 | TEB to PBI | View |
| 1995-04-10 | N/A | Flight 682 | PBI to TEB | View |
| 1995-03-12 | N/A | Flight 665 | PBI to TEB | View |
| 1995-03-09 | N/A | Flight 664 | TEB to PBI | View |
| 1995-02-09 | Flight | Flight from BOS to TEB. | BOS to TEB | View |
| 1993-07-13 | Flight | Flight from TEB to BOS. | TEB to BOS | View |
| 1992-06-18 | Flight | Flight from TEB to PBI. | Between TEB and PBI | View |
| 1992-05-25 | Flight | Flight from PBI to TEB. | Between PBI and TEB | View |
EFTA00030518.pdf
An email chain from July 25, 2019, involving defense attorney Martin G. Weinberg and others regarding the case 'US v Epstein'. Weinberg confirms his intent to sign a Protective Order on behalf of the defense team and requests information on the timing and format of the first wave of discovery. Subsequent emails discuss internal coordination with individuals named Maurene and Andy to prepare materials before an upcoming conference.
EFTA00029939.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Marc Weinstein (counsel for the Epstein Estate). The SDNY is inquiring whether the estate asserts attorney-client privilege over a specific computer seized by the Palm Beach Police Department in 2005, noting that the estate had previously asserted privilege over devices seized by the FBI in 2019. The chain includes scheduling logistics for a conference call to discuss these document requests.
EFTA00024510.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2019 between the US Attorney's Office (Government) and legal counsel for the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP). The Estate's counsel requests search warrant returns and inventories for Epstein's New York and New Mexico properties and proposes a meeting to discuss resolving potential forfeiture claims. The Government responds by noting that defense counsel was required to destroy discovery materials after the case was nolle prossed, but provides Bates number references for documents previously produced regarding the New York property and clarifies that the New Mexico property was not searched.
EFTA00024507.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2019 between legal representatives for the Epstein Estate (Trustees) and Government officials (likely SDNY). The Estate is requesting search warrant inventories for Epstein's New York and New Mexico properties to aid in estate administration. The Government clarifies that previous defense counsel destroyed or returned discovery materials following Epstein's suicide but provides specific Bates numbers for relevant documents and discusses scheduling a meeting to resolve potential forfeiture claims.
EFTA00021367.pdf
This document is an email chain between the FBI and the Southern District of New York (SDNY) from July 2019 regarding the Epstein financial investigation. It details the retrieval of subpoena returns from American Express and Deutsche Bank, which were burned to discs for Special Agents. The emails also discuss the addition of a forensic accountant to the investigative squad and the scheduling of a meeting to discuss the scope of the financial investigation.
EFTA00020481.pdf
An FBI intake report dated August 11, 2020, documenting an online tip regarding a sexual assault alleged to have occurred in the 2000s in Virginia Beach, VA. The complainant, who was 15 at the time, describes being recruited by a man named 'Andy' to give a massage to a 'powerful man' resembling Jeffrey Epstein, which resulted in a sexual assault. The report notes that database queries returned zero results and the information was deemed to have no current lead value.
EFTA00019904.pdf
This email thread from December 2019 is between a government official (Alex) and legal counsel for the Jeffrey Epstein estate (Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP). They discuss the logistics of providing search warrant returns/inventories from the 'now-defunct criminal case' to the estate trustees, specifically regarding properties in New York and the island. The emails also coordinate a future meeting to discuss resolving the government's potential forfeiture claims against the estate.
DOJ-OGR-00022206.tif
This document is a flight log from March 1995, detailing multiple flights on aircraft N908JK (GUS9B) with pilot David Rodger. It records various routes, primarily between TEB, PBI, SAV, DCA, SAF, and NEW, and lists numerous passengers including 'JG', 'CM', 'ANDY', 'RUDERT', 'DAVED ROTH', 'LUBA', 'JANIS KEVEY', 'JEFFREYS FOUNT', 'JONATHAN', 'STEN', and 'DAISY'.
DOJ-OGR-00023122.tif
This document details the finalization and signing of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) on September 24, 2007. It highlights the edits made by Acosta, including changes to Epstein's plea and sentencing requirements, and communications between various parties like Villafaña, Lourie, and Lefkowitz regarding the agreement's language and confidentiality. The document also notes the USAO's duty to redact protected information before disclosure.
DOJ-OGR-00023111.tif
This document details the ongoing plea negotiations for Mr. Epstein, highlighting his reluctance for jail time and the communication between prosecutors Lourie and Villafaña, and defense counsel Jay Lefkowitz. It reveals a disagreement over the terms of the plea agreement, with the defense proposing significant changes that were rejected by the USAO, including a prohibition on immigration proceedings against Epstein's female assistants. The document also includes a manager's view that direct conversation with Epstein might be necessary to finalize the deal.
DOJ-OGR-00023221.tif
This document is an excerpt from a report by OPR detailing issues with the handling of the Epstein case, specifically focusing on Acosta's role. It highlights Acosta's decision-making, his perceived distance from the details of the case, and communication failures among key participants like Villafaña, Lourie, and Menchel. The report suggests Acosta's actions were driven by concerns about state authority interference, rather than an intent to benefit Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00015961.jpg
This document is a flight log page for aircraft N908JE, piloted by David Rodgers, detailing flights between January 21 and March 10, 1997. The log records numerous trips primarily between Palm Beach (PBI) and Teterboro (TEB), with additional flights to St. Maarten, Savannah, Santa Fe, and other locations. The initials 'JE' and 'GM' appear as passengers on nearly every flight, accompanied by a rotating cast of other named individuals.
DOJ-OGR-00015949.jpg
This document is a flight log page (page 34) signed by pilot David Rodgers for the aircraft N908JE (Gulfstream II) covering the period from March 8, 1995, to May 7, 1995. The log details 19 separate flight legs primarily between Teterboro (TEB) and Palm Beach (PBI), with excursions to Washington D.C. (DCA), Santa Fe (SAF), and New Orleans (NEW). Jeffrey Epstein (JE) is on every flight except the initial repositioning, often accompanied by Ghislaine Maxwell (GM) and an individual identified as 'Andy', along with various other guests including 'Jeffrey's Aunt', Janis Kevey, and unnamed passengers.
DOJ-OGR-00015948.jpg
This document is a flight log for aircraft N908JE, a Gulfstream G1159B, covering January to March 1995, signed by pilot David Rodgers. It details numerous flights between airports such as Teterboro (TEB), Palm Beach (PBI), and Washington D.C. (DCA/IAD). The log lists passengers by name or initials, including 'JE', 'GM', 'Andy', 'Henry Rosovsky', and 'Luba', documenting their travel together on various routes.
DOJ-OGR-00021385.jpg
This document details the chaotic final stages of the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement (NPA) negotiations in September 2007, highlighting how the absence of key personnel like Menchel, Lourie, and Sloman led to a lack of clear ownership and fragmented decision-making. The text specifically critiques a broad provision in the agreement not to prosecute 'any potential co-conspirators,' noting it was accepted with little discussion despite internal concerns, which ultimately precluded the USAO from prosecuting others involved in Epstein's criminal conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00021383.jpg
This page from an OPR report discusses the handling of the Epstein case, concluding that prosecutors did not intend to benefit Epstein but that the outcome resulted from Acosta's concerns about state authority. It highlights communication failures within the team, noting that while Acosta was unusually involved in decision-making, he was removed from the supervisory chain and may not have been fully aware of critical details known by staff members like Villafaña.
DOJ-OGR-00021285.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing the internal communications regarding the finalization of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It highlights efforts by the prosecution team (Villafaña, Acosta) to limit the disclosure of the agreement's terms, specifically regarding financial damages, to the Palm Beach Police Chief and the public. The document outlines the specific provisions of the NPA, including the guilty plea to solicitation of minors, the 30-month recommended sentence structure, and the handling of victim damages.
DOJ-OGR-00021284.jpg
This document details the finalization and signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein on September 24, 2007. It describes how Acosta made crucial last-minute edits to the agreement, removing requirements for the state court and State Attorney's Office, and how Epstein's counsel, Lefkowitz, transmitted the signed agreement with a request for it to be kept confidential.
DOJ-OGR-00021273.jpg
This legal document details a critical point in plea negotiations for Mr. Epstein. After prosecutor Lourie believed he had reached an agreement with defense counsel Jay Lefkowitz, Lefkowitz submitted a revised proposal with substantially different terms, including a shorter sentence and protections for Epstein's assistants. This new proposal caused frustration among the prosecutors and was ultimately rejected by the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO).
DOJ-OGR-00021270.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing the plea negotiations between prosecutor Villafaña and Epstein's counsel, Lefkowitz. It outlines the strategy to structure state and federal sentencing to manipulate jurisdiction for prison purposes without alerting the judge. It also explains Villafaña's justification for the non-prosecution agreement covering co-conspirators, stating that the USAO viewed Epstein as the priority and wished to avoid highlighting uncharged conduct to the court.
DOJ-OGR-00021247.jpg
This document excerpt details the defense's ongoing efforts in July 2007 to halt a federal investigation into Epstein and prevent the government from obtaining computer equipment, including sending letters to the USAO. Concurrently, CEOS endorsed Villafaña's legal analysis and proposed charges, with CEOS Chief Oosterbaan finding the defense's arguments unpersuasive and offering CEOS's assistance for the prosecution. The document also references a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and the removal of computer equipment from Epstein's home.
DOJ-OGR-00021232.jpg
This legal document details internal discussions within a prosecutor's office regarding the Epstein case. It outlines the author's opposition to meeting with the defense, led by Lefcourt, arguing it would undermine the prosecution. The document also reveals significant internal conflict, as prosecutor Villafaña expressed fears to the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) about the case's direction and was cautioned by her supervisor about insubordination.
DOJ-OGR-00003272.jpg
This legal document details prosecutor Villafaña's communications and justifications regarding a plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein. Villafaña explains to the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) her strategic decisions, including the structuring of state and federal sentences, the rationale for not prosecuting Epstein's alleged co-conspirators, and the handling of immigration matters concerning Epstein's assistants. The text reveals internal government discussions about the controversial plea agreement and the legal reasoning behind its terms.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033460.jpg
This email chain from January 2010 involves Jeffrey Epstein coordinating with an associate named Joel regarding a golf outing at a Trump course for Epstein's attorney, Jack Goldberger, for which Epstein offers to pay. The conversation also touches on high-value asset transactions, specifically the potential purchase of interests in private aircraft (Hawker 800 XP) and a partnership opportunity with mutual friend Benny Shabtai in a 'depressed market.' Additionally, Epstein provides a contact at JPMorgan, Brian Baker, instructing the recipient to use his name.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033456.jpg
An email chain from January 2010 involving Jeffrey Epstein, 'Joel', and Steve Hanson. The discussion centers on arranging a golf outing at a Trump course in Palm Beach, for which Epstein offers to pay, and specifically requests his attorney Jack Goldberger be included. The emails also discuss potential aircraft transactions, specifically a Hawker 800 XP and a partnership opportunity with Benny Shabtai.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity