Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Ms. Sternheim

Person
Mentions
877
Relationships
86
Events
390
Documents
429
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
86 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Professor Loftus
Legal representative
7
3
View
person Elizabeth Loftus
Legal representative
6
2
View
person Mulligan
Professional
6
2
View
organization GOVERNMENT
Professional
6
2
View
person Unnamed witness
Legal representative
6
2
View
person Elizabeth Loftus
Professional
6
1
View
person Kate
Legal representative
6
2
View
person Loftus
Professional
6
2
View
person Ms. Moe
Opposing counsel
6
2
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Co counsel implied
6
2
View
person Jury
Legal representative
5
1
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Ghislaine
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Ms. Lundberg
Business associate
5
1
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Business associate
5
1
View
organization Defense
Representation
5
1
View
person DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN
Legal representative
5
1
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Co counsel defense
5
1
View
person THE WITNESS (Loftus)
Professional
5
1
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Defense counsel implied
5
1
View
person Dr. Loftus
Legal representative
5
1
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Adversarial professional
5
1
View
organization The government
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Mr. Hamilton
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Judge
Legal representative
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Court proceeding regarding trial schedule, closing arguments, and jury deliberation timing relati... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court Recess pending verdict Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court proceeding sidebar or argument regarding courtroom logistics and COVID protocols. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Opening statement by Ms. Sternheim defending Ghislaine Maxwell Open Court View
N/A N/A Discussion regarding three missing jurors who are stuck on the security line or unaccounted for o... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding upcoming sentencing and review of the presentence report. Courtroom (Southern District) View
N/A N/A Jury Selection (Voir Dire) for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
N/A N/A Examination of witness 'Kate' Courtroom View
N/A N/A Reading of Jury Note regarding Count Four Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Janine Gill Velez Courtroom View
N/A N/A Reading of Jury Note Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of witness 'Kate' regarding exhibits 3513-014. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Discussion regarding jury deliberation schedule and closing arguments Courtroom View
N/A N/A Sentencing hearing where the judge discusses factors for punishment. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court proceedings discussing jury instructions and a question from the jury regarding Count Four. Courtroom View
N/A Trial Discussion of the trial schedule. The defense case is set to begin on the 16th. Courtroom View
N/A Legal proceeding Closing arguments are anticipated for the 20th or 21st. Courtroom View
N/A Court testimony Witness Kate is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz about a visit to Maxwell's house and is shown Governm... Courtroom View
N/A Court proceeding A court hearing to discuss the schedule for jury deliberations. Courtroom View
N/A Court examination Cross-examination of DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN by Ms. Sternheim, starting on page 2242. N/A View
N/A Future court hearing The court scheduled the next session for the 23rd of the month. Courtroom View
N/A Trial An upcoming trial that Ms. Sternheim is scheduled to start on the 16th of the month. Unspecified View
N/A Court proceeding Examination of witness KATE, including direct, cross, redirect, and recross. N/A View
N/A Court proceeding The judge discusses jury deliberation scheduling with counsel, sends a note to the jury, takes a ... Courtroom (implied) View
N/A Court examination Cross-examination of witness DANIEL ALAN BESSELSEN by Ms. Sternheim. N/A View

DOJ-OGR-00011600.jpg

This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, capturing a defense attorney's argument during a sentencing hearing. The attorney, Ms. Sternheim, asks the Court for a sentence below the recommended guidelines, arguing the government's request is disproportionate and that the more culpable Jeffrey Epstein would have faced the same sentencing guidelines as her client, Ghislaine Maxwell.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011598.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on July 22, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. A victim, Ms. Stein, delivers a powerful impact statement describing how Maxwell's actions affected her for 25 years and calls for Maxwell to be imprisoned. Following the statement, another individual, Ms. Sternheim, addresses the court to speak to the victims.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011574.jpg

This is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion about the order of statements. Counsel Ms. Moe asks the judge if victims should speak before or after the main parties. The judge clarifies the intended sequence is government, victims, defense counsel, and then Ms. Maxwell, to which all parties present agree before the court takes a luncheon recess.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011523.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated July 22, 2022, involving Ms. Sternheim (defense) and Ms. Moe (government). The proceedings cover administrative confirmations of filings on ECF and a substantive discussion regarding the government's compliance with the 'Justice For All Act.' Specifically, Ms. Moe confirms that the government has notified six victims, proven at trial to be impacted, about the upcoming sentencing and their right to be heard.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
55
As Recipient
5
Total
60

Scheduling concerns

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Sternheim

Asking if there are concerns regarding the Friday morning session plan.

Court proceeding
N/A
Communication Source

Confidentiality for Ms. Conrad's testimony

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

A letter submitted by Ms. Sternheim regarding Ms. Conrad's confidentiality, medical conditions, disciplinary proceedings, and intention to assert her Fifth Amendment right.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Checking on Mr. Hamilton's availability

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: Mr. Hamilton

The Court instructs Ms. Sternheim to 'make that call' to check on Mr. Hamilton's availability, and she confirms she is doing so.

Phone call
N/A
Communication Source

Witness Testimony Objection

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Discussing objections to the relevance of testimony from upcoming witnesses called out of order.

Dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Witness's positive COVID test

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

A letter was apparently sent to the Court, mentioned by the judge, which stated that Ms. Sternheim's side had the witness's positive COVID test result.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Format inquiry

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Inquiring if a specific format was satisfactory.

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Sentencing Arguments

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding sentencing guidelines, probation recommendations, and culpability comparison between Maxwell and Epstein.

Court proceeding
2023-06-29
Communication Source

Request to speak

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Request to stand at the podium and address the victims directly.

Meeting
2023-06-29
Communication Source

Sentencing and Fines

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the imposition of a fine, the status of a bequest in a will, and the formal imposition of the sentence.

Meeting
2023-06-29
Communication Source

Sentencing of Ms. Maxwell

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["THE COURT", "Judge N...

Ms. Sternheim addresses the court during Ms. Maxwell's sentencing. She acknowledges the victims, confirms the judge can hear her, and begins to argue against the government's sentencing recommendation.

Courtroom dialogue
2023-06-29
Communication Source

Sentencing Arguments

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Defense argues for a lower sentence, citing the probation department's recommendation and comparing Maxwell's culpability to Epstein's.

Meeting
2022-08-22
Communication Source

Admissibility of insurance form content

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding hearsay, the Lieberman case, and verification of employee information.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Witness's memory and knowledge of media coverage

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: Mulligan

Ms. Sternheim questions Mr. Mulligan about his ability to recall events from over 25 years ago, his conversations with Ms. Farmer, and his awareness of media and documentaries related to the case and Ms. Farmer.

Cross-examination
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Scheduling

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding jury deliberation schedule over holidays and COVID-19 protocols.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Exhibit Identification

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: MS. POMERANTZ

Exchange regarding identifying exhibit K-8 / 3513-019.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Scope of witness testimony

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

MS. STERNHEIM and THE COURT discuss the allowable scope of a witness's testimony. The Court rules to limit the testimony to issues from cross-examination that pertain to attacking the credibility of an unnamed woman.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Evidentiary objection regarding witness credibility

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

A dialogue between Ms. Sternheim and the Court regarding the legal basis for an objection to testimony. The Court argues that since Ms. Sternheim's side attacked a witness's credibility regarding her upbringing, the opposing side can bring in evidence to support it. The Court presses Ms. Sternheim for the specific rule (e.g., Relevance, 403) underpinning her objection.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Redirect examination

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: Professor Loftus

Asking if testimony would differ if called by the government.

Courtroom testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Witness Schedule

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Confirming the defense will not call Mr. Hamilton.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Format Inquiry

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Inquiring if a specific format was satisfactory to the Court.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Description of Epstein's private jets and relationship wi...

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["Court/Jury"]

Ms. Sternheim describes Epstein's private jets as a form of high-style commuting for a wide array of people, including friends, celebrities, and politicians. She also outlines the evolution of Ghislaine's relationship with Epstein, from a companion to solely an employee, and states the case will center on four women.

Opening statement
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Defendant's decision to testify

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Sternheim

Judge confirms with attorney Sternheim that she has advised her client regarding the right to testify.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Courtroom Temperature

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Sternheim asks the Judge if the temperature can be raised because it is very cold. The Court responds that they are sweating but will get it raised.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Relevance of Mr. Alessi's testimony

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding inferences drawn from employment status versus physical presence of a child in 2001.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Court proceedings

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Sternheim responds to the Court's questions and begins to address the Court on a matter before being instructed to use the microphone.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search