This document is a Westlaw printout of 5 C.F.R. ยง 2635.101, titled 'Basic obligation of public service.' It outlines the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch, detailing 14 general principles including the prohibition of using public office for private gain, avoiding conflicts of interest, and maintaining impartiality. The document appears to be part of a larger legal file (Bates stamped EFTA00009794-9795), likely included to establish the legal and ethical standards applicable to government officials relevant to the case.
This legal document from an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report analyzes the decision by former U.S. Attorney Acosta to use a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) to resolve the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. OPR concluded that Acosta did not commit misconduct, as there was no clear and unambiguous statute or policy in the U.S. Attorneys' Manual (USAM) that prohibited the use of an NPA in circumstances like Epstein's, where it was not in exchange for cooperation. The document affirms the broad discretion prosecutors hold in making such decisions.
This legal document is a filing by the Government in response to a defense motion. The Government argues that it is not required to produce pages from a personal diary belonging to a third-party victim because the diary is not in its custody or control. Furthermore, the Government asserts that it has already inquired with the victim, who confirmed that no diary entries exist for the relevant time period in the spring of 1996 when she met the defendant while visiting Epstein.
This document is the cover page of the 2018 Annual Public Financial Disclosure Report (OGE Form 278e) for Donald J. Trump, filed in his capacity as President of the United States. It documents his appointment date as January 20, 2017, and contains his signature certifying the report on May 15, 2019, alongside signatures from an agency ethics official and U.S. Office of Government Ethics Director Emory Rounds. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp (016699).
This document appears to be a page (pg. 120) from a draft manuscript or book, likely written by a legal scholar or philosopher, evidenced by the 'WC' (Word Count) header. The text discusses the tension between national security and civil liberties, arguing that the judiciary is best suited to balance these interests during crises. It is marked with a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017207', indicating it was produced as part of a US House of Representatives Oversight Committee investigation.
A forensic log of messages from June 14, 2018, between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation reacts to news involving 'Weisselberg' (likely Allen Weisselberg), discusses allegations dating back to 2013, and speculates whether a legal complaint will lead to opening tax returns. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
This document appears to be page 24 of a legal opinion (2012 WL 257568) regarding 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It discusses the Second Circuit's review of a district court's dismissal of claims under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA), Alien Tort Statute (ATS), and Torture Victims Protection Act (TVPA). The text critiques the lower court for applying incorrect legal standards regarding 'material support' to al-Qaeda. While the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023384' suggests this was part of a congressional investigation (possibly included in a larger production of documents), the specific text on this page contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their specific activities.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity