the defendant
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-6
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-3
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-1
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Criminal |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kellen
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Romantic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
family member
|
Familial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Defendant's friends and family members
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
at least one other person
|
Criminal conspiracy |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MDC staff
|
Custodial inmate guard |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Association |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirators alleged |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MDC staff
|
Custodial adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie
|
Accused accuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sarah Kellen
|
Co conspirator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
her counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Minor Victims-1 through -4 | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Illegal sexual abuse | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Payment of criminal monetary penalties within 30 (or 60) days after release from imprisonment, ba... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jane's testimony regarding sexual abuse | New Mexico (abuse location) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual Abuse | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defendant living in isolation and hiding assets | Unknown hiding location | View |
| N/A | N/A | Period during which the defendant and Epstein committed crimes together. | Epstein's properties | View |
| N/A | N/A | Attendance at Arts Camp | Arts Camp | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flights on private planes with minors | Epstein's private planes | View |
| N/A | N/A | Search of the New York Residence. | New York Residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Limited Hearing | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial completion | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flight to New Mexico | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | N/A | Post-trial allegation of juror bias | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defendant's evasion of detection leading up to arrest. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massages taking place in Epstein's bedroom. | Epstein's Bedroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defendant's Quarantine | MDC | View |
| N/A | N/A | Motion for a New Trial | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grooming and sex acts involving Minor Victim-3 | London | View |
| N/A | N/A | Evasion of detection/press | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition where alleged perjury occurred. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sentencing Hearing / Legal Ruling | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Arrest of Defendant | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Anticipated trial where evidence regarding victims and terms like 'rape' will be used. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sentencing hearing ruling where the judge determines Virginia Roberts and Melissa are victims for... | Courtroom | View |
EFTA00024806.pdf
A Palm Beach Police Department incident report (Narrative #13) detailing the execution of a search warrant on October 20, 2005, related to Case No. 1-05-000368. The reporting officer describes assembling the Crime Scene Investigative Team, video recording the search from entry to exit, and designating specific roles for evidence collection and photography. The search concluded at 3:05 p.m., after which officers met with the defendant's lawyer and left inventory receipts in the personal assistant's office.
EFTA00014016.pdf
A confidential letter dated September 18, 2008, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDFL) to the Florida Bar Ethics Counsel seeking a written opinion on the propriety of contacting victims. The letter discusses the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving a defendant (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein) who pleaded guilty to state sex offenses. The AUSA defends against an accusation by a victim's attorney that notifying victims of the NPA and the availability of independent counsel (Robert Josefsberg) violated Florida Bar rules against solicitation.
DOJ-OGR-00000113.tif
This document outlines conditions for the payment of criminal monetary penalties, including options for installment payments and immediate payment upon release from imprisonment or during imprisonment. It specifies that the court will determine payment plans based on the defendant's ability to pay and that the defendant will receive credit for prior payments. Payments are generally made to the clerk of the court, with an exception for payments via the Federal Bureau of Prisons' Inmate Financial Responsibility Program.
DOJ-OGR-00030313.tif
This document is a page from a court transcript dated May 22, 2009, from case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM. It details a discussion between the Court, the Defendant, and Ms. Belohlavek concerning the conditions of the Defendant's sentence, specifically regarding contact with victims and the completion of a sex offender program, particularly for victims under 18.
DOJ-OGR-00018110.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument about the admissibility of video evidence. An attorney, Ms. Comey, argues that a video showing a photograph in the context of a master bedroom shared by the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein should be admitted. The Court overrules an objection, agreeing that the video's context makes it different from the photograph in isolation and that it corroborates other testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00018107.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Comey argues for the admissibility of evidence showing a 'sexually suggestive photograph of a young girl' located in the entryway to the bedroom where Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein allegedly slept. Comey argues this proves Maxwell's knowledge of the environment, countering the defense's portrayal of Epstein as an upstanding citizen surrounded by prominent people.
DOJ-OGR-00018105.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument over the admissibility of evidence. An attorney, Ms. Comey, contends that a 40-minute walk-through video (Gov. Exhibit 296) is relevant because it shows a previously excluded photograph (Gov. Exhibit 270) prominently displayed outside a master bedroom shared by the defendant and Mr. Epstein. The defense expresses concern that such evidence would be prejudicial to the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00017878.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving a legal argument between the prosecution (Mr. Rohrbach) and the defense (Mr. Pagliuca) before a judge. The discussion centers on the admissibility of a 'contact book' versus a 'household manual,' with the government arguing that the contact book belongs to the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) and/or Jeffrey Epstein and constitutes statements made in furtherance of a conspiracy. The judge acknowledges the government's argument regarding the hearsay exception.
DOJ-OGR-00014838.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 22, 2022, details testimony from a victim named Carolyn, who describes being subjected to a long cycle of sexual abuse by the defendant (identified as Ms. Maxwell) starting at age 14. The defendant exploited knowledge of Carolyn's prior abuse by her grandfather. The document also notes that this was part of a broader pattern of criminal conduct where Ms. Maxwell and Epstein victimized multiple underage girls over many years, and it commends the bravery of the witnesses who testified at trial.
DOJ-OGR-00014835.jpg
This document is page 88 of a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 22, 2022. The Judge ('The Court') is addressing the courtroom regarding sentencing guidelines, stating the applicable range is 188 to 235 months' imprisonment. The Judge outlines the legal requirements under *Booker* and 18 U.S.C. 3553(a) for determining a sentence that is 'sufficient, but no greater than necessary.'
DOJ-OGR-00014798.jpg
This document is page 51 of a court transcript from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 22, 2022. The text details a recruitment chain involving the defendant, Virginia [Giuffre], Carolyn, and Melissa, noting that Melissa's name appears in the defendant's 'little black book.' The court also discusses financial fines, specifically mentioning the defendant's objection to including a $10 million bequest from Jeffrey Epstein as part of her assets.
DOJ-OGR-00014792.jpg
Page 45 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 22, 2022. The judge is issuing a ruling regarding sentencing guidelines, specifically overruling the defendant's objection to an 'undue influence' enhancement. The judge argues that applying the enhancement does not constitute 'double counting' because it addresses the specific harm of using influence to coerce a commercial sex act, distinct from the base offense of the victim being a minor.
DOJ-OGR-00014790.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) discussing the legal definition of 'extensive' criminal activity for sentencing purposes. It details the hierarchy of the conspiracy, naming Epstein and the defendant as knowing participants, noting Sarah Kellen joined in 2002, and identifying Virginia and Carolyn as recruiters of minors starting in 2001. It also credits testimony from employee Juan Alessi regarding his unknowing facilitation of sexualized massages under the defendant's instructions and mentions pilots Visoski and Rodgers.
DOJ-OGR-00014788.jpg
This document is page 41 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 22, 2022. The judge is ruling on sentencing guideline objections, specifically rejecting the defendant's argument against an enhancement for sexual abuse of minors and moving to discuss an enhancement for her 'leadership role' in the criminal activity. The text references Congressional intent regarding the sentencing of sex offenders and the requirements for proving a defendant was an organizer or leader.
DOJ-OGR-00014760.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 22, 2022. The judge is overruling objections made by the defendant regarding the credibility of a witness named Carolyn. The court accepts as fact that Carolyn was introduced to Epstein by Virginia at age 14, visited Epstein's Palm Beach residence over 100 times, and performed sexualized massages until 2001.
DOJ-OGR-00014757.jpg
This document is page 10 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 22, 2022. The Court makes findings on disputed issues, concluding that Virginia was paid to recruit girls just as Carolyn was. The Judge also overrules defense objections regarding the inclusion of an individual named 'Kate' and the characterization of the defendant 'grooming' a victim named 'Jane.'
DOJ-OGR-00014752.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 22, 2022, detailing a portion of a hearing. The judge confirms with the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, and her counsel, Ms. Sternheim, that they have reviewed and discussed the presentence report. The transcript also notes that another attorney, Mr. Everdell, will handle objections for the defense, and confirms with counsel Ms. Moe that a court order was posted online.
DOJ-OGR-00008629.jpg
This document is page 91 of 167 from a court filing (Document 563) dated December 18, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains Jury Instruction No. 4, which advises the jury that statements made by counsel (arguments, objections) and the court (rulings, sidebars) are not evidence, and that the jury's own recollection of the evidence controls the verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00008612.jpg
This document is Page 74 of a court filing (Jury Instruction No. 52) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 18, 2021. The judge instructs the jury that evidence seized by law enforcement was obtained lawfully and properly admitted. The jury is directed to disregard any personal opinions about the search methods and to give the evidence full consideration in determining the defendant's guilt.
DOJ-OGR-00008611.jpg
This document is page 73 of a legal filing (Document 563) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 18, 2021. It contains Jury Instruction No. 51, which advises the jury that the Government is not legally required to use specific investigative techniques to prove its case.
DOJ-OGR-00008578.jpg
This document is page 40 of 167 from a court filing dated December 18, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains Jury Instruction No. 30 regarding 'Aiding and Abetting' for Counts Two, Four, and Six. The text explains the legal standard that allows the jury to convict Ms. Maxwell if she assisted, counseled, or induced another person to commit the charged crimes, even if she did not physically commit them herself.
DOJ-OGR-00008573.jpg
This legal document is a jury instruction (Instruction No. 25) from a court case, filed on December 18, 2021. It outlines the four elements the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt to find the defendant guilty of Count Six: Sex Trafficking of a Minor. The instruction specifies that this particular count pertains solely to a person named Carolyn and the alleged acts occurred between 2001 and 2004.
DOJ-OGR-00008567.jpg
This document is a page from the jury instructions (Instruction No. 19) filed on December 18, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It outlines the three legal elements required to prove 'Count Four: Transportation of an Individual Under the Age of 17 to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity,' specifically relating to a victim identified as 'Jane' between 1994 and 1997. The text includes markup showing specific legal language adjustments, such as defining the age requirement and limiting the scope to interstate commerce.
DOJ-OGR-00008510.jpg
This document is page 54 of 82 from a court filing dated December 17, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains Jury Instruction No. 38, which explains the legal standard for holding a defendant liable for the acts, declarations, and omissions of co-conspirators committed in furtherance of a conspiracy. The instruction notes that such acts can be used as evidence against the Defendant even if they occurred in her absence or without her knowledge, provided the conspiracy is proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
DOJ-OGR-00008489.jpg
This document is page 33 of a court filing (Jury Instructions) from December 2021 in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It outlines the four legal elements required to prove Count Six: Sex Trafficking of a Minor. The document specifically specifies that this count relates to a victim named Carolyn during the period of 2001 to 2004.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-30 | Paid | the defendant | Court/Government | $8,000,000.00 | Property value proposed to secure bail. | View |
| 2020-12-30 | Paid | the defendant | Court/Government | $500,000.00 | Cash proposed to secure bail. | View |
| 2020-12-18 | Paid | the defendant | Pretrial Services | $3,800,000.00 | Assets reported by the defendant to Pretrial Se... | View |
| 2020-07-01 | Paid | the defendant | Self (Assets held) | $3,400,000.00 | Approximate worth of assets held in her own nam... | View |
| 2020-07-01 | Paid | the defendant | Security Guard | $0.00 | Provision of a credit card in the name of the L... | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Paid | the defendant | Trust Account | $4,000,000.00 | Balance of more than $4 million in the Swiss Ba... | View |
| 2019-07-18 | Received | N/A | the defendant | $55,931,000.00 | Valuation of NY property. | View |
| 2019-07-18 | Received | N/A | the defendant | $12,380,209.00 | Valuation of Florida property. | View |
| 2019-07-18 | Received | N/A | the defendant | $17,246,208.00 | Valuation of New Mexico property. | View |
| 2019-07-18 | Received | N/A | the defendant | $194,986,301.00 | Valuation of hedge funds and private equity. | View |
| 2019-07-18 | Received | N/A | the defendant | $14,304,679.00 | Asset valuation (likely cash or fixed income, c... | View |
| 2019-07-18 | Received | N/A | the defendant | $112,679,138.00 | Valuation of equities. | View |
| 2019-07-18 | Received | N/A | the defendant | $22,498,600.00 | Valuation of Great St. James Island property. | View |
| 2019-07-18 | Received | N/A | the defendant | $8,672,823.00 | Valuation of Paris property. | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Paid | the defendant | Trust Account | $500,000.00 | Transfer from personal Swiss Bank account to Tr... | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Paid | the defendant | Trust Account | $750,000.00 | Transfer between personal Swiss Bank account an... | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Paid | the defendant | Self | $2,000,000.00 | Maximum values totaling well over $2 million in... | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Received | Unknown | the defendant | $14,000,000.00 | Deposit into account where defendant was listed... | View |
| 2007-01-01 | Received | Unknown (implied ... | the defendant | $7,000,000.00 | Government argument referenced by defense that ... | View |
| 2001-01-01 | Paid | the defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Direct payment after massages on one or two occ... | View |
No Subject
The document states the defendant has access to email with her defense counsel while detained at the MDC.
No Subject
The document states the defendant has access to calls with her defense counsel while detained at the MDC.
Tax returns
The defendant was faxed information relating to the tax returns.
Legal consultation
The defendant will be given a legal call to confer with her counsel if the counsel does not visit in person on the day of the report.
Legal counsel communication
The document states that MDC staff does not record or listen to the substance of the defendant’s calls and visits with legal counsel.
Defendant's finances and property ownership
The defendant told Pretrial Services that a New Hampshire property was owned by a corporation whose name she didn't know, and she was just permitted to stay there.
Defendant's finances and property ownership
The defendant told Pretrial Services that a New Hampshire property was owned by a corporation whose name she didn't know, and she was just permitted to stay there.
Legal Counsel
5 hours per weekday; 25 hours per week total.
In-person legal visits
In-person visits as needed.
Carolyn's life and background
The defendant had multiple conversations with Carolyn, during which Carolyn revealed details about her life, including prior sexual abuse, her parents' separation, and her mother's addiction.
Legal Consultation
Defense counsel will be able to schedule legal calls for the defendant on weekends as needed.
Defendant's bail proposal and financial resources
The defendant submitted a memorandum that the government claims pointedly declines to provide information about her financial resources.
Legal consultation
In-person visits available 7 days a week but declined by counsel
Legal consultation
VTC calls and supplemental phone calls
Legal consultation
Defendant is able to send and receive emails every day
Third motion for bail
Defendant argues new conditions warrant reconsideration of earlier rulings and that the Government's case is diminished.
Little Black Book
Contact book containing Melissa's name and noting she is a friend of Carolyn's.
Maxwell Br. at 53
Argument that disclosure will color Juror 50's testimony.
Work duties
Instructions to schedule massage appointments, set up massage tables, clean up after massages.
Massages
Defendant denies giving massages to anyone, including Epstein and Minor Victim-2.
Civil matter depositions
Two depositions in a civil matter where the defendant allegedly made false material declarations.
Code of Silence
Instructed employees not to speak directly with Epstein, not to talk to visitors, and to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing.'
Instruction
Directed Virginia to show Carolyn how to sexually gratify Epstein.
Dkt. No. 569
Informing the Court about the juror's interviews.
Dkt. No. 570
Opposing the Government's request for a hearing and arguing for a new trial.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity