This document is a page from a legal filing, likely a motion or a judicial opinion, dated February 5, 2016. It outlines the legal standards for a 'motion to reconsider' in federal court, citing various precedents. The text explains that while not formally recognized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, district courts have inherent discretionary authority to reconsider non-final orders, but the scope for doing so is narrow and limited to specific grounds such as new law, new evidence, or correcting clear error.
This legal document is a motion filed on behalf of Mr. Robertson, asking the court to reconsider its denial of his pretrial release. The motion argues for reconsideration based on new evidence, specifically unforeseen trial continuances and new potential placement options, including with the grandmother of his children and at La Pasada Halfway House. The document cites legal precedent to establish that the court has the authority to amend its prior orders.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity