| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Minor Victim-2
|
Abuser victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Facilitator |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Employees
|
Employee |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed speaker
|
Victim abuser |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Unspecified |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Attorney's office for the Southern District of New York
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Conspiratorial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Abuser victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Recruiter victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Ownership |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Guiffre
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
["her attorneys"]
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Abuser victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional conspiratorial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Elizabeth
|
Defendant victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SARAH
|
Defendant victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Facilitator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sarah Kellen
|
Supervisory professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Alleged conspirators |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Unclear |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Indirect |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional criminal association |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Co-Executors
|
Allied in motion |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 60 in Case 1:20-cv-00484-DGC | Court | View |
| 2020-09-23 | N/A | Submission of a defective letter on behalf of the Appellant in US v. Maxwell | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-09-16 | N/A | Filing of Document 38 in Case 20-3061 | Court of Appeals (implied) | View |
| 2020-09-16 | N/A | Filing of Document 37 in Case 20-3061 | Court of Appeals (implied) | View |
| 2020-09-16 | Legal filing | The Government filed a motion to dismiss Maxwell’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction and requested ... | 2d Cir. | View |
| 2020-09-10 | Legal filing | Maxwell filed an instant motion to consolidate an appeal with another pending appeal in Giuffre v... | N/A | View |
| 2020-09-10 | Legal filing | Maxwell filed the instant motion to consolidate this appeal with the appeal currently pending in ... | N/A | View |
| 2020-09-10 | Legal filing | Maxwell filed a motion to consolidate this appeal. | N/A | View |
| 2020-09-04 | Legal filing | Maxwell filed a notice of appeal. | N/A | View |
| 2020-09-04 | Legal filing | Maxwell filed a notice of appeal from the Order. | N/A | View |
| 2020-09-03 | Legal filing | Filing of a Notice of Appeal and payment of associated fees for the case US v. Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-09-02 | Court ruling | Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's motion to modify the Protective Order. | N/A | View |
| 2020-09-02 | Court ruling | Judge Nathan issued an Order denying Maxwell's motion. | N/A | View |
| 2020-09-02 | Legal ruling | Judge Nathan issued the Order denying Maxwell's motion. | N/A | View |
| 2020-08-24 | Legal filing | Maxwell filed a reply in further support of her motion. | N/A | View |
| 2020-08-21 | Legal filing | The Government filed an opposition to Maxwell's motion to modify the Protective Order. | District Court | View |
| 2020-08-19 | Legal filing | Maxwell filed a letter motion requesting a stay of the civil action pending her criminal case. | Court | View |
| 2020-08-17 | Legal filing | Maxwell filed a motion before Judge Nathan to modify the Protective Order to allow the use of con... | United States District Court | View |
| 2020-08-17 | Legal filing | Maxwell asked Judge Nathan to modify the Protective Order to allow her to use discovery materials... | District Court | View |
| 2020-08-01 | N/A | Email discussion regarding the unsealing of Ghislaine Maxwell's deposition and legal disputes wit... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-30 | Court order | Judge Nathan entered a protective order governing the disclosure of information produced in disco... | United States District Court | View |
| 2020-07-30 | Court order | Judge Nathan entered a protective order governing the disclosure of information in the criminal c... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Bail hearing | The Initial Bail Hearing for Maxwell, where Judge Nathan heard oral arguments and received statem... | The Court | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Court ruling | Judge Nathan ordered Maxwell detained on the basis of risk of flight following the bail hearing. | The Court | View |
| 2020-07-14 | N/A | Maxwell arraignment, initial conference, bail hearing (referenced in attachment filename) | Southern District of New York | View |
This document is a transcript of court testimony from a witness named Kate. She describes Maxwell's role as managing properties for Jeffrey and ensuring they met his standards. Kate testifies that Maxwell claimed to own houses in London and New York City, with the latter being a gift from Jeffrey, and also claimed to be friends with prominent figures like Prince Andrew and Donald Trump.
This document is a page from the court transcript of a witness named Kate under direct examination. Kate testifies about her communications with Maxwell, stating they spoke by phone about general life topics and invitations to visit. She clarifies that sexual topics were only brought up in person, where Maxwell discussed male anatomy and asked Kate if she knew anyone who could perform a sex act for a 'demanding' man named Jeffrey.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on the frequency of her encounters with Epstein and Maxwell at Maxwell's house in London over several years, beginning when she was 17. This followed an incident where Epstein allegedly engaged in sex acts with her during massages at the same location.
This document is a page from a court transcript of a witness named Kate under direct examination, filed on August 10, 2022. Kate testifies about seeing a seventeen-year-old girl having tea with Ghislaine Maxwell at her London townhouse. The questioning also establishes that Kate saw Epstein at the same location on three separate occasions and probes what Maxwell may have said regarding Epstein's potential opinion of the girl.
This document is a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Kate. Kate testifies that Ghislaine Maxwell invited her by phone to her house, complimented her on a previous 'job', and stated that 'He' (implied to be Epstein) wanted her to return. Maxwell then led Kate to a room, opened the door to reveal Jeffrey Epstein standing naked, and told Kate to 'Have a good time.'
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022. During a direct examination, a witness named Kate testifies that Maxwell told her Jeffrey Epstein "needed massages all the time" and that it was "very difficult to keep up." Immediately following this conversation, Kate states that Maxwell led her upstairs to a room containing a massage table.
This document is a page from the court transcript of a witness named Kate. In her testimony, Kate recounts conversations with Maxwell, who described her boyfriend (Epstein) as a philanthropist who helps young people. Maxwell told Kate that Epstein would 'love' her and that she was the kind of person he would want to help, which Kate, being 17 and lonely, found appealing.
This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022. A witness named Kate provides testimony about her first meeting with a person named Maxwell at Maxwell's townhouse, describing her feelings of finding a special and meaningful new friendship. Kate recounts sharing personal details with Maxwell, including her difficult home life with an unwell mother and her plans to study law at Oxford University, which Maxwell had also attended.
This document is a page from a court transcript where a witness named Kate testifies about visiting Ghislaine Maxwell's house for tea. Kate explains she was excited to befriend Maxwell, who was friends with a man Kate was dating. She describes the house's exterior and identifies a photograph of it, marked as Government Exhibit 702, which is then offered into evidence without objection.
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a legal argument by an attorney, Ms. Moe, regarding the authentication of an exhibit related to 'Maxwell and Epstein'. The Court sustains an objection made by Ms. Comey, instructs the jury to disregard certain testimony, and reserves its final decision on admitting the exhibit until after hearing from a witness referred to as 'employee one'.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, by an attorney, Ms. Comey. Ms. Comey presents Government Exhibit 52, which Mr. Alessi identifies as a directory belonging to Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein. The witness confirms he had reviewed the directory the previous night.
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of Mr. Alessi, filed on August 10, 2022. An unnamed questioner asks Alessi about a booklet he received from Ms. Maxwell, focusing on whether specific items listed on pages 29-31 of a document were in it. Alessi denies receiving a specific 'list of shopping' but confirms he received a booklet from Maxwell and remembers some items from it, such as liquor.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the redirect examination of a witness named Jane, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning clarifies that Jane moved residences in the spring of 1995, that her international travel in high school was for family trips unrelated to Maxwell and Epstein, and confirms she was previously questioned about making a statement to a tabloid regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on a discrepancy in her prior statements to the government regarding a trip to New York with Maxwell and Epstein at age 14, specifically about seeing the Broadway show 'The Lion King,' which did not premiere until she was 17. The transcript reveals communications between the government and Jane occurred through her legal representatives, including a Mr. Glassman.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on inconsistencies in her prior statements to the government about a trip to New York with Epstein and Maxwell, specifically a trip to see 'The Lion King'. The witness's attorney, Ms. Moe, objects to the line of questioning, which is overruled by the court.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named 'Jane' by attorney Ms. Menninger. The testimony focuses on clarifying Jane's memory regarding statements made to the FBI and the government in November 2019 and April 2020. Specifically, Jane confirms reporting that she was abused '90 percent of the time' she traveled with Epstein and Maxwell.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. An attorney questions Jane about incidents in New York involving Ghislaine Maxwell, and despite objections from another attorney, Jane confirms that she did tell the government about at least one such incident.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioner challenges Jane's memory and consistency regarding her prior statements to the government about encounters involving herself, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Epstein. The questioning focuses on whether Jane was ever alone with the two and whether Maxwell ever touched her, with Jane repeatedly stating she does not recall specific details but denying the assertion that she doesn't recall being touched.
This document is a page from the court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness identified as 'Jane' in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense attorney attempts to impeach the witness's credibility by highlighting inconsistencies between her current testimony, a statement given in December 2019 (where she had no specific memory), and a statement from February 2020 (where she recalled two other girls being present). The witness claims the government's written record of her statement contains a 'typo' or incorrect wording.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning attorney confirms Jane's prior statement to the government that Maxwell and Epstein visited her house before an instance of abuse. The transcript also explores Jane's past relationship with Ghislaine, whom she once viewed as a "big sister", and confirms details about her own family, including two older sisters.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named 'Jane'. The questioning focuses on a visit Jane and her mother made to Epstein's house in Palm Beach, confirming they were the only people there for tea by the pool. The witness states she does not recall if Ghislaine Maxwell was present and is also questioned about a conversation she had with the government in October 2021.
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against unsealing the grand jury transcripts from the Maxwell case. It asserts that nearly all the information presented to the grand juries is already public record from Maxwell's trial, and the remaining non-public information is minimal and inconsequential. The document concludes that a member of the public familiar with the trial would learn nothing new from the unsealed materials, which do not identify new individuals, clients, or methods related to Epstein's or Maxwell's crimes.
This legal document, filed on August 11, 2025, details a motion by the Deputy Attorney General to unseal grand jury materials from the Maxwell and Epstein cases. The motion is justified by significant public interest and a directive from the President, following a July 6, 2025, DOJ/FBI memorandum on the Epstein investigation. In response, the court has requested additional information from the government to rule on the motion.
This legal document outlines Ghislaine Maxwell's ongoing appeals process, including a denied petition at the Second Circuit and a pending petition before the Supreme Court as of July 2025, which argues her prosecution was barred by Jeffrey Epstein's prior non-prosecution agreement. The document also details a February 27, 2025, Department of Justice press release announcing the declassification and public release of files related to Epstein's crimes. The release features quotes from Attorney General Pamela Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel, who both promise transparency and accountability.
This legal document details the sentencing and subsequent appeal of a defendant named Maxwell. Judge Nathan imposed a 240-month prison sentence, citing Maxwell's direct and prolonged participation with Jeffrey Epstein in a sex trafficking scheme involving underage girls, and also sentenced her to a $750,000 fine. The document notes that on February 28, 2023, the Second Circuit court affirmed Maxwell's conviction and sentence, upholding the lower court's rulings on several key issues.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $18,300,000.00 | Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $0.00 | Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... | View |
Maxwell called to schedule massage appointments for Carolyn, who was a minor.
MAXWELL sent an unsolicited message to Minor Victim-2, during which Minor Victim-2 was topless.
Maxwell told Kate 'amazing things' about her boyfriend, describing him as a philanthropist who liked to help young people, and suggested it would be wonderful for Kate to meet him.
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.
Maxwell instructed Kellen on how to schedule massages and manage a part of the criminal scheme that Maxwell had previously handled.
Maxwell, acting as one of Epstein's employees, would call victims to schedule appointments for them to massage Epstein at his Palm Beach Residence.
Maxwell would inform Carolyn upon her arrival that Mr. Epstein was out for a jog but would be back any moment, and that Carolyn could go upstairs and set up.
Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.
Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.
Maxwell told Kate that she was very accommodating and that whenever Kate wanted to visit, Maxwell and others ('they') would take care of everything. This conversation happened before Maxwell gave Kate a handbag.
Maxwell would call Carolyn to set up appointments for massages, particularly in the first year or two.
Maxwell told Kate that she was very accommodating and that whenever Kate wanted to visit, Maxwell and others ('they') would take care of everything. This conversation happened before Maxwell gave Kate a handbag.
Carolyn named Maxwell as one of two people who would call her to schedule massages with Jeffrey Epstein.
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.
A reply brief filed by the Defendant, Maxwell, which raises an argument about the jury instructions.
According to Kate's testimony, when Maxwell introduced her to Epstein, Maxwell told her to give his feet a squeeze to show how strong she was.
The witness (Kate) testifies that she communicated with Maxwell by phone. Maxwell would ask about her life, if she was dating, and if she wanted to visit. Sexual topics were not discussed on the phone.
Carolyn's mom would receive a phone call, which Carolyn later learned was from Maxwell, and would hand the phone to Carolyn to schedule an appointment.
Shawn would receive a phone call from Maxwell and would then tell Carolyn that she had a phone call and instruct her to say yes to the appointment.
Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of a response from the District Court, claiming it resulted in a constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Maxwell asked Carolyn about her travel history and invited her to an island. Carolyn declined, stating she was too young and her mother would not permit it.
The question implies that Maxwell would call Carolyn to schedule massage appointments with Jeffrey Epstein, even after learning she was 14.
Maxwell asked Carolyn what she wanted to do in the future, and Carolyn replied that she wanted to become a massage therapist.
Maxwell told the witness, Kate, that Epstein likes 'cute, young, pretty' girls and that he needed to have sex about three times a day. These conversations occurred frequently ('All the time') within the first couple of months after they met.
MAXWELL sent an unsolicited message to Minor Victim-2, during which Minor Victim-2 was topless.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity