| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
The Speaker
|
Abusive |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SARAH
|
Unspecified |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Victim perpetrator implied |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Maria
|
Abusive |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co involvement in criminal activity |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Author of the document
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial defendant prosecution |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Adversarial accused victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Unspecified |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Abuser victim dynamic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirators alleged |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
This Court
|
Litigant court |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The district court
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Associative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Transactional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Accomplice co conspirator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Elizabeth Stein
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Prince Andrew
|
Social |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Queen Mum
|
Commentator observer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness (A. Farmer)
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Recruiter target |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juan Alessi
|
Professional supervisor subordinate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-01-01 | Conspiracy / recruitment scheme | Later phase of the scheme where Maxwell and Epstein developed a stream of girls who recruited eac... | Palm Beach residence | View |
| 2000-01-01 | N/A | Transporting Virginia to other states | Various States | View |
| 2000-01-01 | Flight | Virginia Roberts, age 17, was flying with Maxwell and Epstein on Epstein's private jet. | Epstein's private jet | View |
| 2000-01-01 | Recruitment | Maxwell recruited Virginia Roberts. | Mar-a-Lago | View |
| 2000-01-01 | N/A | Sexual Abuse / Pyramid Scheme | Mansions | View |
| 2000-01-01 | N/A | Carolyn's first visit to massage room | Palm Beach massage room | View |
| 2000-01-01 | N/A | Recruiting Virginia Roberts | Mar-a-Lago | View |
| 2000-01-01 | Recruitment and flight | Maxwell recruited Virginia Roberts at Mar-a-Lago. Virginia Roberts, then 17, flew with Maxwell an... | Mar-a-Lago | View |
| 1999-10-19 | N/A | Transfer of $18,300,000 to Maxwell. | JP Morgan | View |
| 1999-01-01 | Financial transaction | Epstein sent Maxwell $18.3 million. | N/A | View |
| 1999-01-01 | Contact | Jane stayed in touch with Epstein and Maxwell after moving to California, until approximately the... | N/A | View |
| 1997-03-20 | Property purchase | Land records show Maxwell purchased the property on Kinnerton Street. | Kinnerton Street | View |
| 1996-01-01 | Social outing | MAXWELL and Epstein took Minor Victim-2 to a movie. | New Mexico | View |
| 1996-01-01 | Crime | MAXWELL provided an unsolicited massage to a topless minor. | New York | View |
| 1996-01-01 | Abuse | Conduct involving Minor Victim-2 occurred. | N/A | View |
| 1996-01-01 | Grooming/abuse | Annie Farmer went to New Mexico where Maxwell groomed her for sexual abuse and massaged her breasts. | New Mexico | View |
| 1996-01-01 | Crime | Enticement of a minor to travel for purposes of sexual abuse. | Florida to New York | View |
| 1996-01-01 | N/A | Group sexual encounters involving Jane, Maxwell, and Epstein. | New York and Florida | View |
| 1996-01-01 | Enticement to travel for sexual abuse | Minor Victim-1 was enticed to travel from Florida to New York for the purpose of being sexually a... | Florida to New York | View |
| 1996-01-01 | N/A | Maxwell provided Annie with an unsolicited massage while Annie was topless. | New Mexico | View |
| 1996-01-01 | Unsolicited massage / sexual abuse | MAXWELL provided Minor Victim-2 with an unsolicited massage while Minor Victim-2 was topless. | New Mexico | View |
| 1996-01-01 | Social outing | MAXWELL took Minor Victim-2 shopping. | New Mexico | View |
| 1996-01-01 | Assault | MAXWELL provided Minor Victim-2 with an unsolicited massage during which Minor Victim-2 was topless. | New Mexico | View |
| 1995-01-01 | Exploitation/travel | Maxwell was traveling with and exploiting Jane. | Palm Beach, New York, and N... | View |
| 1995-01-01 | Recruitment and abuse | Maxwell was in contact with Kate, encouraging her to travel to see her and Epstein. During the sa... | Palm Beach, New York, New M... | View |
This document is an email header from November 18, 2020, forwarding a notification regarding activity in the criminal case 'USA v. Maxwell' (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Specifically, it relates to a 'Memo Endorsement'. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but a Bcc includes 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'.
This document is an email header dated December 11, 2020, with the subject 'RE: Maxwell Financial Report Appendices'. The identities of the sender and recipients are fully redacted. The email appears to be part of legal discovery or internal correspondence regarding financial reports related to Ghislaine Maxwell, indicated by the Bates number EFTA00026402 at the bottom.
This document is an email header dated December 11, 2020, regarding 'Maxwell Financial Report Appendices'. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but a Bcc includes 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'. The email includes an embedded message file with the same subject.
This document is an email dated April 29, 2020, sent between redacted parties. The subject line and attachment indicate the correspondence concerns a 'draft indictment' for Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell), dated April 28, 2020. The sender asks the recipient to review the document before discussing it.
This document is a digital calendar entry from March 10, 2021, recording the acceptance of a meeting titled 'Epstein/Maxwell FOIA'. The attendee is an individual from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), whose name is redacted. The meeting was scheduled for 30 minutes and classified as 'X-PERSONAL'.
An internal email dated October 25, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The email concerns a '3500 cover letter' (referring to Jencks Act disclosures) and includes an attachment named '2021.10.25_Maxwell_Cover_Letter_v1.docx', indicating preparation for discovery production in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.
This document is an email metadata record dated January 11, 2021, regarding a 'Maxwell drive delivery'. The email was routed through a Bureau of Prisons (BOP.GOV) server, suggesting it concerns the delivery of digital materials (likely legal discovery) to Ghislaine Maxwell while in custody. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but a Bcc to 'USAHUB-USAJournal111' is visible.
This document is an email chain from April and May 2021 between staff and contractors at the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The correspondence concerns the transcription of a specific, redacted recording. One participant explicitly mentions being preoccupied with work related to 'Maxwell' (Ghislaine Maxwell), indicating this administrative task was part of the preparation for her prosecution. The final email confirms the transcription was completed, with one interviewer in the recording identified only as 'UM1'.
This document is an email dated August 17, 2021, from Assistant US Attorney Andrew (likely Andrew Rohrbach) to redacted colleagues. It discusses a recent ruling by Judge Nathan denying Ghislaine Maxwell's supplemental motions. The email focuses on correcting the Judge's presumption that the prosecution intended to provide the defense with the identities of uncharged co-conspirators, stating clearly that they 'do not, in fact, intend to do so' and have drafted a letter to that effect.
This document is an email dated February 13, 2020, from Alaska Airlines' legal department to an FBI Special Agent in New York. The airline confirms they have 'no responsive records' regarding a Federal Grand Jury subpoena issued on January 23, 2020, related to 'Maxwell' (presumably Ghislaine Maxwell).
This document is an email metadata printout dated September 28, 2020, originating from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject concerns a draft letter to Judge Nathan regarding discovery in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The document contains technical email headers, including a Message-ID and an embedded message reference, with most participant identities redacted.
This document is an email header and metadata printout dated September 25, 2020. The subject line 'RE: Epstein/Maxwell Upload' suggests the transmission of digital files related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but a Bcc recipient is visible as 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'.
An email dated September 30, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding the 'Maxwell case.' The email discusses a draft 'RTC' (likely Requests to Charge/Jury Instructions) attached as 'Maxwell_RTC_v11.docx' and notes a filing deadline of October 27 for a joint proposal.
This document is an email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan dated October 29, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). It is addressed to counsel, including Laura Menninger and Jeff Pagliuca, distributing an attached Order issued by the Judge and noting it will be filed publicly the following Monday.
This document is an email dated August 5, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney to a redacted recipient. The email contains an attachment titled '2020.08.05_Maxwell_Discovery_Letter.docx', indicating it relates to legal discovery in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The body text is brief, simply stating 'Here's the letter.'
This document is a digital calendar entry dated October 16, 2020, scheduling a 30-minute tentative meeting titled 'Maxwell - Discuss Images from Epstein Devices'. The entry includes metadata such as creation and modification timestamps, but the attendee information and dial-in details are redacted. The document appears to be part of an investigative or legal file (likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) referencing evidence from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices.
This document is an email notification dated October 16, 2020, indicating the acceptance of a meeting invitation. The subject of the meeting is 'Maxwell - Discuss Images from Epstein Devices', sent by an individual from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The names of the sender and recipient are redacted.
This document is an email sent on February 3, 2021, by an unnamed Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The subject deals with 'Maxwell motions' (part 2 of 3) and includes a zip file attachment related to a filing from January 25, 2021.
An email correspondence dated November 4, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) to an unknown recipient. The email contains an attachment titled '2021.11.03_Maxwell_RTC_[unredacted].docx', likely pertaining to legal filings or proceedings regarding Ghislaine Maxwell.
This document is a heavily redacted email chain from September 10, 2020, between unidentified government officials (likely DOJ/FBI). The discussion concerns a budget shortage ('out of money through the end of the fiscal') preventing the immediate hiring of a vendor to scan 'SDFL Epstein stuff' and process 'OPR Epstein stuff'. Despite the shortage, one participant confirms that an unidentified male superior 'will find the 10K for Maxwell' to ensure the work proceeds without waiting until October.
An email dated October 19, 2020, from a Paralegal Specialist at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the '5th Production' of discovery materials. The email outlines the procedure for sending hard drives and password-protected cover letters to Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) and defense counsel.
This document is an email chain from October 13-14, 2020, discussing technical discovery tasks for the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The correspondence involves the transfer and database indexing of files, specifically 26,164 documents from the 'FBI Files from Florida Office' and boxes of files from the 'USAO-SDFL' (Southern District of Florida). The participants are coordinating the loading of these materials into a 'US v Epstein' Relativity database and physical delivery of drives to 1 St. Andrews (SDNY office).
This document contains an email chain from June 2021 involving an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) investigating a specific financial transaction from October 1999. The investigation focuses on a $18,300,000 transfer to 'Maxwell' (presumably Ghislaine Maxwell) from the Financial Trust Company's JP Morgan account (ending in 5001). The correspondence confirms the transfer was funded by the sale of a JP Morgan Institutional Prime Money Market Fund.
This document is an email dated August 14, 2020, with the subject 'Key docs'. It lists several attached files which appear to be internal prosecution memoranda and reports related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. The attachments include a prosecution memo for Epstein (JE), a co-conspirator investigation update from Dec 2019, a prosecution memo for Ghislaine Maxwell (GM), a perjury supplement, a prosecution memo for a redacted individual, and original Palm Beach Police reports.
This document is an email chain from late September 2020 between members of a legal team regarding the 'Fourth Production' of discovery materials. Key topics include the technical handling of 'LSJ Scene2Go' (an application containing 3D maps of Little St. James, specifically the grotto and main structure), the processing of a JPMorgan document production, and the status of files related to 'Maxwell's MDC drive'. The team discusses strategies for Bates stamping viewable image files versus system files to ensure the defense can utilize the materials.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $18,300,000.00 | Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $0.00 | Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... | View |
Carolyn named Maxwell as one of two people who would call her to schedule massages with Jeffrey Epstein.
Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.
Maxwell would inform Carolyn upon her arrival that Mr. Epstein was out for a jog but would be back any moment, and that Carolyn could go upstairs and set up.
Maxwell told Kate that she was very accommodating and that whenever Kate wanted to visit, Maxwell and others ('they') would take care of everything. This conversation happened before Maxwell gave Kate a handbag.
Maxwell would call Carolyn to set up appointments for massages, particularly in the first year or two.
Maxwell told Kate that she was very accommodating and that whenever Kate wanted to visit, Maxwell and others ('they') would take care of everything. This conversation happened before Maxwell gave Kate a handbag.
Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.
A reply brief filed by the Defendant, Maxwell, which raises an argument about the jury instructions.
According to Kate's testimony, when Maxwell introduced her to Epstein, Maxwell told her to give his feet a squeeze to show how strong she was.
The witness (Kate) testifies that she communicated with Maxwell by phone. Maxwell would ask about her life, if she was dating, and if she wanted to visit. Sexual topics were not discussed on the phone.
Carolyn's mom would receive a phone call, which Carolyn later learned was from Maxwell, and would hand the phone to Carolyn to schedule an appointment.
Shawn would receive a phone call from Maxwell and would then tell Carolyn that she had a phone call and instruct her to say yes to the appointment.
Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of a response from the District Court, claiming it resulted in a constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Maxwell asked Carolyn about her travel history and invited her to an island. Carolyn declined, stating she was too young and her mother would not permit it.
The question implies that Maxwell would call Carolyn to schedule massage appointments with Jeffrey Epstein, even after learning she was 14.
Maxwell asked Carolyn what she wanted to do in the future, and Carolyn replied that she wanted to become a massage therapist.
Maxwell told the witness, Kate, that Epstein likes 'cute, young, pretty' girls and that he needed to have sex about three times a day. These conversations occurred frequently ('All the time') within the first couple of months after they met.
MAXWELL sent an unsolicited message to Minor Victim-2, during which Minor Victim-2 was topless.
MAXWELL sent an unsolicited message to Minor Victim-2, during which Minor Victim-2 was topless.
Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of Judge Nathan's response to the jury's note and raised issues of constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Maxwell told Juan Alessi that she was taking over the house right away when she arrived.
A reply brief cited as "Maxwell Reply at 18" where the Defendant asserts the government failed to prove its case.
A brief cited as "Maxwell Br. at 30" where the Defendant requests a judgment of acquittal on all counts.
Maxwell asked Annie if she had ever received a massage and told her she would have the opportunity to have one, describing how enjoyable it would be.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity