| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
The Speaker
|
Abusive |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SARAH
|
Unspecified |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Victim perpetrator implied |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Maria
|
Abusive |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co involvement in criminal activity |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Author of the document
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial defendant prosecution |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Adversarial accused victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Unspecified |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Abuser victim dynamic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirators alleged |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
This Court
|
Litigant court |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The district court
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Associative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Transactional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Accomplice co conspirator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Elizabeth Stein
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Prince Andrew
|
Social |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Queen Mum
|
Commentator observer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness (A. Farmer)
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Recruiter target |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juan Alessi
|
Professional supervisor subordinate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-10 | N/A | US V Maxwell TRIAL proceedings | Court | View |
| 2021-10-21 | N/A | Telephone Conference held by Judge Nathan (Subject line implies 'Tomorrow' relative to 21st, but ... | Telephone Conference | View |
| 2021-10-18 | Legal deadline | The deadline to prepare and submit additional filings (motions in limine). | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-11 | N/A | Deadline for Government to disclose all Jencks Act and Giglio material. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2021-08-27 | N/A | Administration of the Maxwell Juror Questionnaire | Unknown | View |
| 2021-08-13 | N/A | Judge Nathan denied all of Maxwell's supplemental motions and an ex parte motion for Rule 17 subp... | Court | View |
| 2021-08-13 | Court ruling | The Court denied Maxwell's motion to obtain relief specified in her supplemental pre-trial motion... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-08-11 | N/A | A voice message from an unavailable name was received and forwarded through an agency/organizatio... | Unknown | View |
| 2021-07-12 | Trial | Scheduled commencement date for the trial. | United States District Court | View |
| 2021-06-25 | N/A | Filing of Document 307 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | US District Court (SDNY imp... | View |
| 2021-06-25 | N/A | Court ruling denying Maxwell's motion to suppress evidence. | Court | View |
| 2021-06-25 | N/A | Filing of Document 307 | Court Docket | View |
| 2021-05-27 | Legal filing | Filing of a legal document arguing for the denial of Maxwell's motion. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-05-27 | N/A | Maxwell filed a 'renewed motion' under the same docket as her initial appeal. | Appellate Court | View |
| 2021-05-27 | N/A | Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's bail applications. | District Court | View |
| 2021-05-17 | Legal filing | Maxwell filed a renewed motion for pretrial release. | N/A | View |
| 2021-04-29 | Legal action | Maxwell submitted a letter to Judge Nathan regarding her sleeping conditions at the MDC. | District Court | View |
| 2021-04-29 | N/A | Judge Nathan issued an order on the docket in Maxwell's case directing the MDC to take certain st... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-04-29 | N/A | Canceled: Hold for Maxwell witness meetings | Unknown | View |
| 2021-04-27 | Court ruling | The Court affirmed Judge Nathan's bail decisions and denied Maxwell's motion for pretrial release. | Court | View |
| 2021-04-27 | Legal ruling | The Court affirmed Judge Nathan's orders denying Maxwell's pretrial release and denied her motion... | N/A | View |
| 2021-04-16 | N/A | Filing of Document 207 | Court Record | View |
| 2021-04-16 | Court ruling | The Court issued an opinion denying the Defendant's pretrial motions as premature. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2021-04-16 | Legal proceeding | The Court issued an Opinion & Order, the reasoning of which is used to deny Maxwell's current mot... | N/A | View |
| 2021-04-16 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 207 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | N/A | View |
This document is a page from a court transcript where a witness named Jane provides testimony under direct examination. She describes being led by a man (contextually Epstein) to a pool house where he sexually assaulted her by masturbating on her. Jane explains her reaction was to freeze in fear and that she did not tell anyone because she was terrified and ashamed, but confirms she continued spending time with Maxwell and Epstein in Palm Beach after the incident.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Jane. Jane testifies that an unnamed male (implied to be Epstein) provided financial support to her and her mother, paying for items like voice lessons and clothes. She also recounts a disturbing conversation with Maxwell, who advised her that once she had a sexual relationship with a boyfriend, they were 'grandfathered in,' implying she could always resume it.
This document is a page from a court transcript where a defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, is delivering a summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger systematically attacks the credibility of a key witness by highlighting numerous instances where the witness claims she cannot remember crucial details of her alleged encounters with Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The attorney argues that the witness's lack of memory regarding being touched, kissed, or seeing Maxwell present during sexual acts contradicts the government's case and makes her testimony unreliable.
This document is a personal statement from a victim detailing over a decade of severe emotional and physical suffering, including a diagnosis of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), following abuse. The speaker explains that the arrests of Epstein in 2019 and Maxwell in 2020 were pivotal, providing the validation needed to finally disclose the abuse to others and begin a path toward closure.
This document is a victim's testimony from a legal case, detailing the profound and lasting trauma inflicted by Epstein and Maxwell. The speaker describes being terrified and threatened with death, and how her attempts to escape by moving were futile as they always found her. This involvement led to a decade of severe mental and physical health issues, including over two dozen hospitalizations, and left her unable to hold a job or care for herself.
This document is a victim's testimony from a legal case, detailing horrific sexual abuse perpetrated by Epstein and Maxwell over seven to eight months. The victim describes being manipulated and abused daily at Epstein's New York mansion and private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands, culminating in an escape attempt. The testimony highlights the methods of control and psychological torment used by Epstein and Maxwell to ensnare their victims.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 22, 2022. It captures a portion of a victim impact statement hearing, where the court acknowledges written submissions from Ms. Bryant, Ms. Maria Farmer, and Ms. Helm before hearing live testimony from Ms. Ransome. Ms. Ransome begins her testimony by describing the lasting trauma from a "hideous trap set by Epstein, Maxwell and other co-conspirators" and recounts how she was approached by an "Epstein-Maxwell recruiter" named Natalya after moving to New York at age 22.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) containing a statement, likely a closing argument or sentencing memo, regarding the defendant, Maxwell. The text details the defendant's predatory behavior, describing how she manipulated and trafficked young girls for sex to serve a middle-aged man.
This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, where attorneys debate whether Maxwell had a supervisory or leadership role over Sarah Kellen. One attorney argues against this, citing testimony from Larry Visoski and Cimberly Espinosa that Kellen was Epstein's assistant, not Maxwell's. In response, another attorney, Ms. Moe, references testimony from a witness named Carolyn who recalled Kellen scheduling massages while Maxwell was present at the Palm Beach residence, implying a connection.
This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, detailing arguments in a criminal case. The prosecution, represented by Ms. Moe, asserts that the defendant held a leadership role over Sarah Kellen, citing flight records showing they both traveled on Jeffrey Epstein's private jet during the same period. The defense, represented by Mr. Everdell, begins to challenge the prosecution's legal interpretation regarding the need to prove supervision of another criminal participant.
A legal letter dated February 7, 2018, from the law firm Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP, representing intervenor Alan Dershowitz in the Giuffre v. Maxwell case. The letter is addressed to attorneys J. Stanley Pottinger, Paul G. Cassell, Sigrid S. McCawley, and Laura A. Menninger. The correspondence begins an allegation that the plaintiff's counsel improperly leaked submissions from a pending disciplinary proceeding to the Washington Post.
This document is a court filing (Page 4 of 6) from April 16, 2019, discussing various allegations related to Jeffrey Epstein. It details claims by 'Ransome' about being recruited as a masseuse, held against her will, and forced into sex by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, leading to a civil lawsuit. The document also describes Epstein's plea deal, which quashed an FBI investigation, and includes a photograph of Virginia Roberts with Prince Andrew, with Ghislaine Maxwell in the background, where Roberts claims she was a sex slave and had sex with the prince.
This document is a digital communication log from December 6, 2018, marked as House Oversight evidence. It details a conversation between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (likely Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The discussion involves confirmation that 'Chomsky' is 'all in,' followed by an inquiry regarding 'Maxwell' (Ghislaine), with the redacted sender noting she has a 'jealous' boyfriend, to which the jeeitunes account responds dismissively ('So what').
This document is a printed email chain from May 2016 ending with Darren Indyke forwarding a message to Jeffrey Epstein (at jeevacation@gmail.com). The subject line references 'Maxwell' (likely Ghislaine Maxwell). The body of Indyke's email is redacted as privileged. The forwarded message is from Miles Alexander (Operations Manager) stating 'Answer to questions asked' and 'No response received'.
This page is from a legal complaint (Case 1:15-cv-07433) filed on September 21, 2015. It outlines allegations of libel against Ghislaine Maxwell, stating she and her agent Gow made false statements with 'actual and deliberate malice' to discredit the plaintiff, Giuffre. The document asserts that these statements damaged Giuffre's professional reputation as the president of a sex trafficking non-profit and falsely accused her of lying about being recruited by Maxwell and abused by Epstein.
This document appears to be a page from a narrative work or report (marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp) discussing conspiracy mentality. It features a quote from 'Maxwell' recounting a salacious anecdote about the Queen Mother having a secret boyfriend who allegedly broke into Buckingham Palace. The text then pivots to a quote from conspiracy theorist David Icke regarding the British Royal Family and allegations of shapeshifting rituals.
This document is an email chain from August 11, 2009, between paralegal Jessica Cadwell (of Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman, LLP) and Jacquie Johnson. The conversation concerns the 'Jane Doe' case and specifically inquires about the status of serving a subpoena to 'Maxwell' (Ghislaine Maxwell). The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or interview. The speaker discusses suspicions regarding flight logs provided by Bruce Rinehart, a former AUSA who went to work near and allegedly for Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker notes that the logs showed approximately ten flights involving Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Epstein, and suggests the term 'one female' in the logs may have been a code word for an underage girl.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $18,300,000.00 | Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $0.00 | Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... | View |
Maxwell would inform Carolyn upon her arrival that Mr. Epstein was out for a jog but would be back any moment, and that Carolyn could go upstairs and set up.
Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.
Witness clarifies distinction between spending physical time vs communicating. States she stopped spending time around age 24.
Maxwell instructed Kellen on how to schedule massages and manage a part of the criminal scheme that Maxwell had previously handled.
Carolyn named Maxwell as one of two people who would call her to schedule massages with Jeffrey Epstein.
Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.
She told me to get undressed.
making small talk
Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Maxwell informing Carolyn that Epstein was on a jog or would be back soon and that she could go upstairs to set up.
Maxwell calling Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages when Maxwell was in New York.
The witness, Kate, states that Maxwell might be talking on the phone about her famous friends while Kate was present.
A filing titled "Maxwell Reply" is cited, where the Defendant raises an argument in a footnote for the first time.
A household manual dictated the operation of the Palm Beach residence and included rules for staff, such as to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing'.
Maxwell directed Juan Alessi to speak to Epstein only when spoken to and not to look him in the eyes.
Maxwell advised Jane that once she has a sexual relationship with a boyfriend, she can always have one again because they are 'grandfathered in'.
Maxwell has been on record since 2009 calling Carolyn for appointments.
Carolyn testified that Maxwell called her to schedule sexualized massages.
Review of discovery materials
Maxwell, acting as one of Epstein's employees, would call victims to schedule appointments for them to massage Epstein at his Palm Beach Residence.
Maxwell called to schedule massage appointments for Carolyn, who was a minor.
Renewing request to question Juror 50 directly and proposing twenty-one pages of questions.
Maxwell told Kate 'amazing things' about her boyfriend, describing him as a philanthropist who liked to help young people, and suggested it would be wonderful for Kate to meet him.
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.
Maxwell told Kate that she was very accommodating and that whenever Kate wanted to visit, Maxwell and others ('they') would take care of everything. This conversation happened before Maxwell gave Kate a handbag.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity