| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor defendant |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (Correspondent)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Chris Niles
|
Professional support |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Professional opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigator subject |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Miller
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (USANYS)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ted
|
Professional cooperative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Joe Nascimento
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Martin Weinberg
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Bachner
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew Tomback
|
Opposing counsel government investigator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED] (Recipient)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Kimberly Mehlman-Orozco
|
Professional correspondence |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-18 | N/A | Assistant US Attorney hand-delivered a discovery production and a laptop to the MDC for Ms. Maxwell. | MDC | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Scheduled 'Reverse Proffer' meeting between Michael Bachner and SDNY prosecutors. | 1 St. Andrew's Plaza, New Y... | View |
| 2019-07-08 | N/A | Conference, initial appearance, arraignment, and bail hearing for Jeffrey Epstein | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2008-06-27 | N/A | Telephone conference regarding Epstein plea agreement compliance | Telephone (6:30 pm) | View |
This document is an email thread from July 6-9, 2019, immediately following Jeffrey Epstein's arrest. An attorney named 'Joe' from the Miami firm Ross Amsel Raben Nascimento contacts an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) because a female client (name redacted) was served with a grand jury subpoena on July 6. The client was previously represented by Joe's deceased partner, Alan Ross. The emails coordinate a phone call between the defense attorney and the prosecutor for the following Tuesday.
This document is an email chain from August 2019 involving the SDNY US Attorney's Office and likely the OIG regarding the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death and previous suicide attempt. The emails discuss scheduling a 'proffer with witness' and sharing a 'pros memo' (prosecution memorandum). Key inquiries focus on what a witness knows about the '7/23 attempt' (Epstein's first suicide attempt) and specific correctional officers identified as Thomas, Noel, and an African American female lieutenant.
This document is an email chain between attorney Jeffrey Pop and an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York regarding the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. Pop submits an Attorney Proffer detailing his client's interactions with Epstein, asserting she is a victim who was introduced to Epstein in New York (not involving minors) and suffers to this day. The SDNY prosecutor confirms that, based on current information, they do not believe the client has criminal exposure and discusses potential statutes of limitation.
This document is an email chain from January 2020 between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY. The correspondence concerns the submission of evidence from a witness represented by McCawley, specifically photographs and journal entries from 1995 and 1996. The witness's journal entries detail a trip to New York, visiting Jeffrey Epstein's house, and going to the movies with him.
This document contains an email chain between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) and an Assistant United States Attorney from the SDNY regarding a witness in the Epstein/Maxwell investigation. The correspondence, dating from January to May 2020, discusses the provision of the witness's journal entries from late 1995 and early 1996, which detail a trip to New York, visits to Epstein's house, and social outings with him. The prosecutors also request a follow-up interview with the witness, noting they found her previous testimony credible.
This document contains email correspondence between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and defense counsel Glen McGorty of Crowell & Moring LLP regarding a cooperating witness (Mr. [Redacted]). The emails arrange proffer interviews via WebEx and discuss the witness's potential testimony at Ghislaine Maxwell's trial in November 2021. Key topics of interest for the prosecution include Epstein's relationship with Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in the Virgin Islands, specifically whether Epstein provided favors (such as trips to his island) to CBP agents in exchange for bypassing standard immigration processing for himself and his guests.
This document is a chain of emails from July 2019 between defense attorney Michael Bachner and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the Epstein investigation. The correspondence discusses scheduling a 'reverse proffer' meeting and addresses a Grand Jury subpoena for Bachner's client, who intends to invoke their Fifth Amendment privilege. The prosecution (SDNY) challenges the blanket invocation of the Fifth Amendment and shares the 2007 Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and a blank proffer agreement with the defense.
This document is an email chain from October and November 2020 between Crowell & Moring LLP attorneys (representing a redacted witness) and the SDNY US Attorney's Office. The correspondence coordinates a second proffer interview for the witness, scheduled for November 12, 2020, which will include FBI agents. The focus of the interview is specifically on the witness's knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's interactions with US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in the Virgin Islands, including whether CBP employees helped Epstein avoid standard entry processing and if Epstein provided favors (such as trips to his island) to CBP staff. A specific CBP employee in St. Thomas is mentioned as having the witness listed in their phone contacts.
This email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and investigators discusses the identification of Jeffrey Epstein's associates who might facilitate financial transactions on his behalf. The response highlights the massive scale of Epstein's network, noting over 30 attorneys, 60+ accounts at Deutsche Bank, and AmEx records showing payments for nearly 5,000 flights over ten years. Darren Indyke and Jeffrey Schantz are specifically named as individuals likely to send money for Epstein.
This document is an email chain from November 2021 in which Thomas Volscho forwards evidence to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The evidence consists of 1997 classified advertisements from Palm Beach newspapers where a 'Miss Maxwell' or 'Ms. Maxwell' is seeking help for answering phones and light cleaning during school holidays. Volscho notes that the phone number matches a 1996 traffic citation for Ghislaine Maxwell and references a Daily Mail article about her using ads to recruit victims.
This document is an email chain between the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the law firm Crowell & Moring regarding the scheduling and preparation for a proffer interview of a client (Mr. [Redacted]). The investigation focuses on the client's knowledge of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) employees in the Virgin Islands who may have assisted Jeffrey Epstein in avoiding standard entry processing or received favors from him, such as trips to his island. The emails arrange a WebEx meeting for November 12, 2020, to discuss these topics and specific interactions with a CBP employee who had the client's contact information.
This document is an email chain between defense attorney Michael Bachner and an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) regarding the Epstein investigation. The correspondence discusses scheduling a 'reverse proffer' meeting and addresses a Grand Jury subpoena for Bachner's female client. Bachner formally notifies the prosecution that his client intends to invoke her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, while the prosecution pushes back against a 'blanket' invocation. The emails also reference the 2007 Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) being sent as an attachment.
This document is an email chain from July 6-12, 2019, between attorney Joe Nascimento and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. Nascimento contacts the AUSA after a former client of his deceased partner (Alan Ross) was served with a grand jury subpoena regarding the Epstein investigation. They coordinate a call and subsequently arrange an in-person meeting at the Hilton in West Palm Beach for July 12, 2019, to discuss the matter, with Nascimento requesting a 'proffer letter'.
This document is a letter from Kenneth Starr to a high-ranking DOJ official arguing against the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. Starr alleges significant prosecutorial misconduct, including violations of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), leaks to the New York Times, and conflicts of interest within the US Attorney's Office. He claims the prosecution is politically motivated by Epstein's ties to Bill Clinton and requests a 'de novo' independent review of the case.
This document contains an email chain between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and attorneys from Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (Roberta Kaplan, Kate Doniger, Alexandra Conlon) spanning from January to April 2020. The correspondence concerns a 'Touhy letter' request filed by the law firm for information relating to Jeffrey Epstein to support pending litigation against his estate. The USANYS acknowledges the request and provides periodic updates on the status of their review.
Sending unsigned version of subpoena; noting defense will serve later.
Checking status; haven't been served yet.
Noting delay may be due to court voir dire.
Inquiry regarding Rule 17(c) subpoena in US v. Maxwell; asking for attorney contact.
Referring to Pat Smith of Smith Villazor, LLP as outside counsel.
Asking for a call this afternoon.
Proposing 2:30 pm.
Confirming 2:30 works and providing dial-in.
Confirming flexibility on start time for a meeting.
Discussing meeting times for Thursday/Friday and COVID-19 mask protocols/entry screening forms.
Request for domestic fact witness travel arrangements and hotel accommodation for trial/grand jury preparation.
Confirming the requested information is going in the mail tomorrow and will also be emailed.
Checking in, asking for a quick call.
Jocks states he is working on the request and hopes to have it complete in the next couple of days.
Providing revised spreadsheets for mini-VHS tapes. Confirming Marshals will bring Maxwell to MDC by 4:30pm, setting review times at 500 Pearl from 9:30am-4:30pm starting April 13th.
Confirming Maxwell's transport to 500 Pearl on April 13. Discussing annotated evidence spreadsheets, mini-VHS tapes, and items at FBI headquarters (shredded paper).
Addressing logistics: FBI inspections at Bronx warehouse, designation of 'Confidential' vs 'Highly Confidential' photos, witness statements, use of proffer rooms at 500 Pearl, and bringing 2,100 electronic images to 500 Pearl.
Response regarding physical evidence. Refusing to bring massage tables, cash, and bulky items (plaster busts, stuffed dog) to 500 Pearl. Discussing playback equipment for tapes.
Confirming receipt of subpoena for additional student records. Hopes to gather everything by April 12th. Asks for confirmation that it is okay to notify parents/students of the subpoena.
Attaching a subpoena for additional student records following a phone conversation.
Detailed explanation of 'Highly Confidential' nude images (2,100 from devices, 3,400 from discs, 7 hard copies). Explaining constraints on reviewing obscene material. Detailing rules for Bronx warehouse review.
Detailed report of a call from a woman claiming to be an Epstein victim and former client of Mr. [Redacted].
Call to desk line identifying self as victim and former client of attorney.
Instructions to use the file path field to find the NYC number, referring to a screenshot.
Requesting follow up on Victoria Secret/FedEx retention, review of images, and ALAT regarding UK travel records.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity