HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028233.jpg

Extraction Summary

6
People
4
Organizations
4
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Book excerpt / memoir page (evidence in house oversight investigation)
File Size:
Summary

This document is a page (385) from a memoir, likely by former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, produced as evidence in a House Oversight investigation (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028233). The text details the political situation in Israel in late November (presumably 2000), discussing the collapse of peace talks with Yasser Arafat, the political pressure from Ariel Sharon and the Likud party, and Barak's internal deliberations regarding early elections and his responsibility for the failure of the Camp David summit. While the document is part of an Epstein-related production (Barak was an associate of Epstein), the content of this specific page is strictly political history regarding the Middle East peace process.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Ehud Barak Narrator / Prime Minister of Israel
The narrator ('I') discussing his political struggles, peace negotiations, and role as Prime Minister.
Yasser Arafat Palestinian Leader
Discussed as the counter-party in failed peace agreements and the Camp David summit.
Bill Clinton US President
Mentioned regarding his impending departure.
Arik (Ariel Sharon) Opposition Leader
Mentioned as leading the Likud and conveying interest in a unity coalition.
Shlomo Ben-Ami Israeli Official
Quoted regarding the Israeli view of Arafat's response to Camp David.
Hafez al-Assad Syrian President
Mentioned in the context of peace efforts.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Likud
Political party attempting to bring down the government.
Knesset
Israeli parliament, processing motions of no-confidence.
Labor Party
The narrator's political party.
House Oversight Committee
Source of the document stamp.

Timeline (3 events)

2000 (Past reference)
Camp David Summit
Camp David, USA
2000 (Past reference)
Withdrawal of troops
Lebanon
Israeli Military
November 2000
Motions of no-confidence in the Knesset
Israel

Locations (4)

Location Context
Subject of political concessions.
Location of peace summit.
Location from which troops were withdrawn.
Implied location of government.

Relationships (3)

Ehud Barak Adversarial / Negotiation Partners Yasser Arafat
Discusses failed peace agreements and microscopic chances of success.
Ehud Barak Political Rivals Ariel Sharon (Arik)
Sharon attempting to bring down government; discussing unity coalition.
Ehud Barak Political Allies Bill Clinton
Barak links his prospects to Clinton's tenure.

Key Quotes (3)

"Arafat’s response to Camp David was not peace, it was an intifada."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028233.jpg
Quote #1
"I believed that the chances of a peace agreement with Arafat were so microscopic as to border on non-existent"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028233.jpg
Quote #2
"The game-playing side of politics was the part I least understood, and most disliked."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028233.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,719 characters)

/ BARAK / 99
By the end of November, I believed that the chances of a peace agreement with Arafat were so microscopic as to border on non-existent, and that my own prospects for retaining sufficient support to be an effective Prime Minister much beyond Clinton’s departure were not much better. It was not just Arik and the Likud, but other parties on the right that were actively attempting to bring down the government. I was being squeezed politically: by opposition to the concessions, especially on Jerusalem, I’d been willing to consider in pursuit of a peace agreement, and by the ever-worsening Palestinian violence. Shlomo Ben-Ami put it best, saying that in the view of most Israelis, “Arafat’s response to Camp David was not peace, it was an intifada.”
By the second part of November, there were five separate motions of no-confidence working their way through the Knesset. I could have quashed them all at a single stroke, since Arik, both publicly and privately, was conveying to me his continuing interest in joining a unity coalition. But I again decided against it, at this stage not so much because I expected a peace deal, but because I believed continued Israeli engagement in the peace process was essential to preventing Arafat from evading his responsibility for making a deal impossible.
I could also have wrongfooted my opponents by insisting that any early election be not just for a new Prime Minister but for a new Knesset, something very few existing Knesset members were anxious to see happen. I did, in fact, do precisely that at the end of November, delaying an immediate move to try to topple the government. But I immediately regretted doing it. The game-playing side of politics was the part I least understood, and most disliked. I recognized that to bring down the Knesset along with me would be unfair to the country, not to mention my own Labor Party, which still had the largest number of parliamentary seats. In pursuing my peace efforts with Hafez al-Assad, and at Camp David, I’d insisted I was acting on the mandate I’d received in the Prime Ministerial election. If the peace efforts had failed, or if a significant part of the country felt I was wrong to have tried in the way I did, surely the responsibility for that, too, should fall on me.
I remained confident I had been right to make the efforts with Arafat, with Assad, and, of course, to have followed through on my pledge to withdraw our troops from Lebanon. But believing that you are right, even if later events might bear you out, was not all that mattered in politics. You had to be able to bring the public with you. It was clear my support was ebbing away. Looking ahead to the
385
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028233

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document