HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013861.jpg
2.55 MB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Evidence document / book excerpt
File Size:
2.55 MB
Summary
This document appears to be a page from a self-help or business productivity book (stylistically matching Tim Ferriss's 'The 4-Hour Workweek') that was included in a House Oversight Committee investigation file (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013861). The text discusses the concept of 'batching' tasks to save time and money, using a commercial printing example to illustrate setup costs and economy of scale. It advocates for checking email and mail infrequently to increase efficiency.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Annie Dillard | Author/Quote Source |
Winner of Pulitzer Prize in nonfiction, 1975; quoted regarding schedules.
|
| The Author (Narrator) | Writer |
Discusses personal habits regarding checking mail between mid-2004 and 2007.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Identified via the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013861' at the bottom.
|
Key Quotes (5)
"A schedule defends from chaos and whim. — ANNIE DILLARD"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013861.jpg
Quote #1
"The setup is the real time-consumer, and thus the job, despite its small size, needs to be scheduled just like the other"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013861.jpg
Quote #2
"Batching is also the solution to our distracting but necessary time consumers, those repetitive tasks that interrupt the most important."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013861.jpg
Quote #3
"More than a quarter of each 9–5 period (28%) is consumed by such interruptions."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013861.jpg
Quote #4
"From mid-2004 to 2007, I checked mail no more than once a week, often not for up to four weeks at a time."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013861.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (3,244 characters)
routine and ensure that you achieve more outside of the meeting than the attendees do within it; repeat the disappearing act as often as possible and cite improved productivity to convert this slowly into a permanent routine change.
Learn to imitate any good child: “Just this once! Please!!! I promise I’ll do X!” Parents fall for it because kids help adults to fool themselves. It works with bosses, suppliers, customers, and the rest of the world, too.
Use it, but don’t fall for it. If a boss asks for overtime “just this once,” he or she will expect it in the future.
Time Consumers: Batch and Do Not Falter
A schedule defends from chaos and whim.
— ANNIE DILLARD, winner of Pulitzer Prize in nonfiction, 1975
— ANNIE DILLARD, winner of Pulitzer Prize in nonfiction, 1975
If you have never used a commercial printer before, the pricing and lead times could surprise you.
Let’s assume it costs $310 and takes one week to print 20 customized T-shirts with 4-color logos. How much and how long does it take to print 3 of the same T-shirt?
$310 and one week.
How is that possible? Simple—the setup charges don’t change. It costs the printer the same amount in materials for plate preparation ($150) and the same in labor to man the press itself ($100). The setup is the real time-consumer, and thus the job, despite its small size, needs to be scheduled just like the other, resulting in the same one-week delivery date. The lower economy of scale picks up the rest: The cost for 3 shirts is $20 per shirt x 3 shirts instead of $3 per shirt x 20 shirts.
The cost- and time-effective solution, therefore, is to wait until you have a larger order, an approach called “batching.” Batching is also the solution to our distracting but necessary time consumers, those repetitive tasks that interrupt the most important.
If you check mail and make bill payments five times a week, it might take 30 minutes per instance and you respond to a total of 20 letters in two and a half hours. If you do this once per week instead, it might take 60 minutes total and you still respond to a total of 20 letters. People do the former out of fear of emergencies. First, there are seldom real emergencies. Second, of the urgent communication you will receive, missing a deadline is usually reversible and otherwise costs a minimum to correct.
There is an inescapable setup time for all tasks, large or minuscule in scale. It is often the same for one as it is for a hundred. There is a psychological switching of gears that can require up to 45 minutes to resume a major task that has been interrupted. More than a quarter of each 9–5 period (28%) is consumed by such interruptions.13
This is true of all recurring tasks and is precisely why we have already decided to check e-mail and phone calls twice per day at specific predetermined times (between which we let them accumulate).
From mid-2004 to 2007, I checked mail no more than once a week, often not for up to four weeks at a time. Nothing was irreparable, and nothing cost more than $300 to fix. This batching has saved me hundreds of hours of redundant work. How much is your time worth?
Let’s use a hypothetical example:
1. $20 per hour is how much you are paid or value your time. This would be the case, for example, if you
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013861
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document