DOJ-OGR-00013559.jpg

547 KB

Extraction Summary

6
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 547 KB
Summary

A transcript page from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The Judge discusses a potential stipulation regarding testimony from Mr. Glassman about advice he gave to 'Jane' concerning cooperation with the government, aiming to avoid attorney-client privilege issues. The court also addresses administrative matters regarding letters submitted the previous night.

People (6)

Name Role Context
The Court Judge
Presiding over the hearing, managing evidentiary issues regarding Mr. Glassman's testimony.
Mr. Glassman Witness/Subject of Testimony
Potential witness whose testimony regarding 'Jane' is being debated.
Jane Subject/Victim
Person whom Mr. Glassman allegedly told that cooperation would help her case.
Ms. Comey Prosecutor
Representing the government (Maurene Comey).
Mr. Pagliuca Defense Attorney
Representing the defense (Jeff Pagliuca).
Mr. Everdell Defense Attorney
Representing the defense (Christian Everdell).

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting service.
Dept of Justice (DOJ)
Implied by footer stamp DOJ-OGR.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Court hearing/sidebar regarding admissibility of testimony.
Courtroom (Southern District)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied jurisdiction based on court reporter footer (likely SDNY).

Relationships (2)

Mr. Glassman Advisor/Associate Jane
Glassman advised Jane regarding cooperation helping her case.
Ms. Comey Opposing Counsel Mr. Pagliuca
Representing opposing sides in court dialogue.

Key Quotes (3)

"testimony from Mr. Glassman that he told the government that he told Jane that some form of cooperation or testimony would help her case."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013559.jpg
Quote #1
"it's not an attorney-client privilege issue."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013559.jpg
Quote #2
"I'd like you to consider a proposal in which the testimony that you're seeking is limited to that... whether it could be through stipulation."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013559.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,553 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 757 Filed 08/10/22 Page 18 of 49 1991
LC9VMAXT
1 issue and it's close, I'll admit, based on where I am now. I
2 think it's close.
3 But what I'm wondering is if what the defense
4 essentially needs to make the arguments it wants to make is
5 testimony from Mr. Glassman that he told the government that he
6 told Jane that some form of cooperation or testimony would help
7 her case. That question might have some evidentiary issues,
8 but it's not an attorney-client privilege issue.
9 I think the answer to that question basically gets the
10 defense what it's looking for without infringing on
11 attorney-client privilege. And so I'd like you to consider a
12 proposal in which the testimony that you're seeking is limited
13 to that and, depending on the parties' views and Mr. Glassman's
14 views, if that is the limit of the testimony, whether it could
15 be through stipulation.
16 So you'll consider that.
17 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor.
18 MR. PAGLIUCA: We will, your Honor.
19 THE COURT: Okay. All right.
20 Anything else I can take up?
21 We're checking on our jurors.
22 MR. EVERDELL: Nothing from the defense, your Honor.
23 THE COURT: I'm sorry.
24 So you put in the letters to me last night on 52.
25 You'll docket those today?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013559

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document