DOJ-OGR-00020690.jpg
1.24 MB
Extraction Summary
7
People
2
Organizations
5
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court docket sheet / pacer report
File Size:
1.24 MB
Summary
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 12, 2021. It details orders regarding strict COVID-19 protocols for an upcoming in-person proceeding on November 15, 2021, including the use of overflow courtrooms for the public. Additionally, it includes an order addressing a Government motion, where the Judge rules that limiting cross-examination of pseudonymous witnesses regarding their careers would violate Maxwell's Sixth Amendment rights, though specific employer names cannot be elicited.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the court orders and motions.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Signed the orders and is the addressee of the letter motions.
|
| Jeffrey Pagliuca | Attorney |
Mentioned in relation to the filing of exhibits in the first partial entry.
|
| Maurene Comey | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Filed letter motions on behalf of the USA.
|
| Alison Moe | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Filed letter motions on behalf of the USA.
|
| Lara Pomerantz | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Filed letter motions on behalf of the USA.
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Filed letter motions on behalf of the USA.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Venue for the proceedings.
|
|
| USA |
Filed letter motions against Maxwell.
|
Timeline (2 events)
11/15/2021
In-person proceeding / Status Conference
Courtroom 518, Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse, New York
Judge Alison J. Nathan
Ghislaine Maxwell
Locations (5)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the court proceedings.
|
|
|
Address of the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse.
|
|
|
Primary courtroom for the Nov 15 proceeding.
|
|
|
Overflow rooms for the public.
|
|
|
Address listed for the status conference.
|
Relationships (2)
Listed together as AUSAs filing motions.
Orders issued by Judge Nathan as to Ghislaine Maxwell.
Key Quotes (4)
"The Court anticipates seating capacity in the overflow rooms for at least 50 members of the public."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020690.jpg
Quote #1
"All visitors must wear a mask that covers the person's nose and mouth. Bandannas, gaiters, and masks with valves are not permitted."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020690.jpg
Quote #2
"The Government's suggested level of generality as to permissible cross-examination of the witnesses' careers would unduly curtail the Defendant's Sixth Amendment right to meaningful cross-examination."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020690.jpg
Quote #3
"the Defendant may not elicit the name of a specific employer, but the type and genre of employment may be relevant to the jury's assessment of credibilty."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020690.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (4,437 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 57, 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page72 of 208
A-68
A-68
2/22/23, 1:25 PM
SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6
SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6
Preclude the Introduction of Alleged Co-Conspirator Statements as a Sanction for
Failing to Comply with This Court's September 3, 2021 Order.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit
A (Filed Under Seal), # 2 Exhibit B (Filed Under Seal), # 3 Exhibit C (Filed Under Seal),
# 4 Exhibit D (Filed Under Seal), # 5 Exhibit E)(Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Main Document 453
replaced on 11/22/2021) (jw). (Entered: 11/12/2021)
Failing to Comply with This Court's September 3, 2021 Order.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit
A (Filed Under Seal), # 2 Exhibit B (Filed Under Seal), # 3 Exhibit C (Filed Under Seal),
# 4 Exhibit D (Filed Under Seal), # 5 Exhibit E)(Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Main Document 453
replaced on 11/22/2021) (jw). (Entered: 11/12/2021)
11/12/2021 454 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: As discussed at Wednesday's conference, the Court
will hold an in-person proceeding on November 15, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. The proceeding
will take place in Courtroom 518 of the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York, Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse at 40 Foley Square, New
York, New York. In accordance with its prior Order, the Court will ensure access for
alleged victims and any members of the Defendant's family. Dkt. No. 344. In order to
comply with the District's COVID-19 protocols, the public will be able to access the
proceeding in overflow Courtrooms 110 and 506 of the Thurgood Marshall U.S.
Courthouse. These overflow rooms will have live video and audio feeds of the
proceeding. The use of any electronic devices during the proceeding in the overflow
rooms is strictly prohibited. The Court anticipates seating capacity in the overflow rooms
for at least 50 members of the public. If capacity is reached, no additional persons will be
admitted. Per the S.D.N.Y. Response to COVID-19, anyone who appears at any S.D.N.Y.
courthouse must complete a questionnaire on the date of the proceeding prior to entering
the courthouse. All visitors must also have their temperature taken when they arrive at the
courthouse. Only persons who meet the entry requirements established by the
questionnaire and whose temperatures are below 100.4 degrees will be allowed to enter
the courthouse. All visitors must wear a mask that covers the person's nose and mouth.
Bandannas, gaiters, and masks with valves are not permitted. If a person does not have an
approved mask, a screener will provide one. Anyone who fails to comply with the
COVID-19 protocols that have been adopted by the Court will be required to leave the
courthouse. There are no exceptions. For more information, please see
https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/covid-19-coronavirus. SO ORDERED. (Status
Conference set for 11/15/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 518, 40 Centre Street, New
York, NY 10007 before Judge Alison J. Nathan) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on
11/12/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 11/12/2021)
will hold an in-person proceeding on November 15, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. The proceeding
will take place in Courtroom 518 of the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York, Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse at 40 Foley Square, New
York, New York. In accordance with its prior Order, the Court will ensure access for
alleged victims and any members of the Defendant's family. Dkt. No. 344. In order to
comply with the District's COVID-19 protocols, the public will be able to access the
proceeding in overflow Courtrooms 110 and 506 of the Thurgood Marshall U.S.
Courthouse. These overflow rooms will have live video and audio feeds of the
proceeding. The use of any electronic devices during the proceeding in the overflow
rooms is strictly prohibited. The Court anticipates seating capacity in the overflow rooms
for at least 50 members of the public. If capacity is reached, no additional persons will be
admitted. Per the S.D.N.Y. Response to COVID-19, anyone who appears at any S.D.N.Y.
courthouse must complete a questionnaire on the date of the proceeding prior to entering
the courthouse. All visitors must also have their temperature taken when they arrive at the
courthouse. Only persons who meet the entry requirements established by the
questionnaire and whose temperatures are below 100.4 degrees will be allowed to enter
the courthouse. All visitors must wear a mask that covers the person's nose and mouth.
Bandannas, gaiters, and masks with valves are not permitted. If a person does not have an
approved mask, a screener will provide one. Anyone who fails to comply with the
COVID-19 protocols that have been adopted by the Court will be required to leave the
courthouse. There are no exceptions. For more information, please see
https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/covid-19-coronavirus. SO ORDERED. (Status
Conference set for 11/15/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 518, 40 Centre Street, New
York, NY 10007 before Judge Alison J. Nathan) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on
11/12/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 11/12/2021)
11/12/2021 455 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey,
Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 12, 2021 re:
Clarification re pseudonym order . Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell.
(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 11/12/2021)
Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 12, 2021 re:
Clarification re pseudonym order . Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell.
(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 11/12/2021)
11/12/2021 456 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from
AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated
November 12, 2021 re: Co-Conspirator Statements Document filed by USA. (Comey,
Maurene) (Entered: 11/12/2021)
AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated
November 12, 2021 re: Co-Conspirator Statements Document filed by USA. (Comey,
Maurene) (Entered: 11/12/2021)
11/12/2021 458 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court is in receipt of the Government's letter
motion seeking clarification on two items from the November 1, 2021 pretrial
conference. Dkt. No. 455. As to the first item, the Government seeks clarification about
the line between permissible and impermissible cross-examination for witnesses
testifying under a pseudonym. The Government's suggested level of generality as to
permissible cross-examination of the witnesses' careers would unduly curtail the
Defendant's Sixth Amendment right to meaningful cross-examination. See United States
v. Figueroa, 548 F.3d 222, 227 (2d Cir. 2008). The line of questioning the Government
identifies may be relevant to a juror's credibility determination and thus the Court will not
limit the Defendant's ability to pursue such questioning on cross-examination. As the
Court noted at the November 1 conference, the Defendant may not elicit the name of a
specific employer, but the type and genre of employment may be relevant to the jury's
assessment of credibilty. Nov. 1, 2021 Transcript at 11-12. As to the second item, the
motion seeking clarification on two items from the November 1, 2021 pretrial
conference. Dkt. No. 455. As to the first item, the Government seeks clarification about
the line between permissible and impermissible cross-examination for witnesses
testifying under a pseudonym. The Government's suggested level of generality as to
permissible cross-examination of the witnesses' careers would unduly curtail the
Defendant's Sixth Amendment right to meaningful cross-examination. See United States
v. Figueroa, 548 F.3d 222, 227 (2d Cir. 2008). The line of questioning the Government
identifies may be relevant to a juror's credibility determination and thus the Court will not
limit the Defendant's ability to pursue such questioning on cross-examination. As the
Court noted at the November 1 conference, the Defendant may not elicit the name of a
specific employer, but the type and genre of employment may be relevant to the jury's
assessment of credibilty. Nov. 1, 2021 Transcript at 11-12. As to the second item, the
https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211087015221896-L_1_0-1
68/113
DOJ-OGR-00020690
68/113
DOJ-OGR-00020690
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document