This document is page 70 of a court transcript from the summation in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues against the testimony of expert witness Loftus regarding false memories, citing a study where researchers failed to implant false memories of a 'rectal enema.' Moe argues that, like the enema, sexual abuse is a traumatic event that cannot be suggested or falsely implanted, and notes that Loftus admitted traumatic memories are stronger than others.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor/Attorney |
Delivering the summation (closing argument) to the jury.
|
| Loftus | Expert Witness |
Referenced as a defense expert on memory who testified previously; likely Elizabeth Loftus.
|
| Ladies and gentlemen | Jury |
Addressed directly by the prosecutor.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information.
|
|
| DOJ |
Implied by DOJ-OGR bates stamp.
|
"A rectal enema is the kind of thing you'd only remember if it really happened, kind of like sexual abuse."Source
"She said the core memory of trauma is stronger than other types of memory. She admitted that."Source
"You don't need a paid expert to tell you that, ladies and gentlemen. It's just common sense."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,630 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document