DOJ-OGR-00018465.jpg
549 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
549 KB
Summary
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues for the admission of evidence showing the dates a female witness ('she') maintained contact via email with a male subject ('him') to prove a relationship existed after the events in question. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) argues that the witness already admitted to the dates, making the evidence cumulative.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Arguing for the admissibility of dates of contact between a witness and another individual.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the evidentiary dispute regarding hearsay and relevance.
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Prosecutor |
Representing the government, arguing the evidence is cumulative.
|
| She | Witness/Subject |
An unnamed female individual who testified and maintained contact with 'him'.
|
| Him | Subject of contact |
Person with whom 'she' maintained contact/emailed.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00018465)
|
|
| The Government |
Referenced by the Court ('hear the government's response')
|
Timeline (1 events)
August 10, 2022
Court proceeding/filing regarding evidentiary admissibility.
Courtroom (Southern District)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by Southern District Reporters (likely SDNY)
|
Key Quotes (4)
"Judge, I want the dates."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018465.jpg
Quote #1
"It's being offered for the truth that she had contact."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018465.jpg
Quote #2
"She said she emailed with him."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018465.jpg
Quote #3
"So this seems cumulative, your Honor."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018465.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,362 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 128 of 261 1289
LC6VMAX4
LC6VMAX4
1 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I would just say that it is not
2 being offered for the truth; it's offered for the fact that she
3 maintained contact with him at a time later than the matters in
4 issue and, therefore, it has relevance.
5 THE COURT: That's the truth, what you just said.
6 It's being offered for the truth that she had contact.
7 MS. STERNHEIM: Well, that part is not hearsay. The
8 content is hearsay. The fact of the contact itself is
9 something else. That's my understanding of it.
10 THE COURT: Well, okay. She said she emailed with
11 him. If you want to redact the content and show that there
12 were emails, I suppose that's another question. But if you're
13 not -- you want the content, which is consistent with what she
14 testified to.
15 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I want the dates.
16 THE COURT: Okay.
17 MS. STERNHEIM: And that is not hearsay.
18 THE COURT: All right. So the dates then I would
19 permit -- I'll hear the government's response to this, but with
20 the content redacted.
21 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, I'd like to check the
22 transcript, because I thought she had agreed to the dates. And
23 so --
24 THE COURT: She did.
25 MS. POMERANTZ: So this seems cumulative, your Honor.
2 being offered for the truth; it's offered for the fact that she
3 maintained contact with him at a time later than the matters in
4 issue and, therefore, it has relevance.
5 THE COURT: That's the truth, what you just said.
6 It's being offered for the truth that she had contact.
7 MS. STERNHEIM: Well, that part is not hearsay. The
8 content is hearsay. The fact of the contact itself is
9 something else. That's my understanding of it.
10 THE COURT: Well, okay. She said she emailed with
11 him. If you want to redact the content and show that there
12 were emails, I suppose that's another question. But if you're
13 not -- you want the content, which is consistent with what she
14 testified to.
15 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I want the dates.
16 THE COURT: Okay.
17 MS. STERNHEIM: And that is not hearsay.
18 THE COURT: All right. So the dates then I would
19 permit -- I'll hear the government's response to this, but with
20 the content redacted.
21 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, I'd like to check the
22 transcript, because I thought she had agreed to the dates. And
23 so --
24 THE COURT: She did.
25 MS. POMERANTZ: So this seems cumulative, your Honor.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018465
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document