This document is page 116 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The witness, identified as Loftus (likely Elizabeth Loftus), is testifying during direct examination about the ethical limitations of human experimentation and the role of human subjects review committees. She discusses her work on 'false memories,' describing how she obtains approval to plant false traumatic memories in research participants, such as being attacked by an animal, while noting that more disturbing scenarios (e.g., forced animal sacrifice by a parent) might be rejected by ethics committees.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Loftus | Witness/Expert |
Testifying during direct examination regarding memory research; likely Elizabeth Loftus, a memory expert called by th...
|
| Unidentified Attorney | Interviewer |
Conducting the direct examination (marked as Q.).
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer.
|
|
| Human Subjects Review Committee |
Mentioned by Loftus as the entity that approves or rejects research proposals.
|
|
| US District Court Southern District of New York |
Implied by case number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE and 'Southern District Reporters'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
General reference to the academic setting where research reviews take place.
|
"in the case of my work on false memories, what kind of false memory I would propose to plant in the minds of a research participant."Source
"So I might want to plant a false memory that something horrible happened that would have been traumatic if it actually had happened, like you were, you know, attacked by a vicious animal."Source
"like a deliberate attempt to -- to plant a memory, for example, that your father, you know, forced you to sacrifice animals or breed babies and kill"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,675 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document