DOJ-OGR-00016758.jpg
541 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
541 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Attorneys Ms. Comey and Ms. Menninger discuss with the Court the admissibility of testimony and specific emails involving Mr. Glassman (referencing 'The Lion King') and Mr. Rossmiller. The discussion centers on a prior ruling limiting testimony from attorneys to specific statements regarding whether testifying would help the defendant's case.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Comey | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Speaking to the court regarding the record and preclusion of testimony.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney (Defense) |
Discussing stipulations, emails, and potential testimony.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion regarding rulings on attorney testimony.
|
| Mr. Glassman | Subject of testimony/Email author |
Mentioned in relation to an email about 'The Lion King' and a statement about whether testifying would help the case.
|
| Mr. Rossmiller | Potential witness/Subject |
Mentioned by Ms. Menninger regarding his 'potential' (likely testimony).
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Implied by Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR-00016758'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the court (likely SDNY based on case number AJN - Alison J. Nathan).
|
Relationships (2)
Exchanging arguments before the judge.
Both mentioned in the context of attorney testimony/motions.
Key Quotes (3)
"I'm not sure what the status is of this email with Mr. Glassman about The Lion King, if that was a stipulation"Source
DOJ-OGR-00016758.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor's ruling about testimony from attorneys was that the only permissible testimony would have been the email from -- the statement by Mr. Glassman about whether testifying would help her case"Source
DOJ-OGR-00016758.jpg
Quote #2
"If this is implicated in the motion related to calling the three attorneys, then that was my ruling with respect to that."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016758.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,500 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 29 of 197 2570
LCFCmax1
LCFCmax1
1 potentially having to testify.
2 THE COURT: I think that's a conferral question. I
3 don't have a basis to know.
4 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. I'm asking so that there
5 is a clear record.
6 THE COURT: Okay. Ms. Menninger, you can think about
7 it.
8 MS. MENNINGER: I'm not sure what the status is of
9 this email with Mr. Glassman about The Lion King, if that was a
10 stipulation --
11 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I believe that was precluded.
12 Your Honor's ruling about testimony from attorneys was that the
13 only permissible testimony would have been the email from --
14 the statement by Mr. Glassman about whether testifying would
15 help her case and that all other testimony about attorneys
16 would be precluded.
17 THE COURT: If this is implicated in the motion
18 related to calling the three attorneys, then that was my ruling
19 with respect to that.
20 MS. MENNINGER: I'll have to look back at that, your
21 Honor. That's the only other thing that's coming to mind with
22 respect to Mr. Rossmiller's potential --
23 THE COURT: That series was questioned during the
24 testimony, which may have been my basis.
25 MS. MENNINGER: It may be, your Honor. I just don't
2 THE COURT: I think that's a conferral question. I
3 don't have a basis to know.
4 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. I'm asking so that there
5 is a clear record.
6 THE COURT: Okay. Ms. Menninger, you can think about
7 it.
8 MS. MENNINGER: I'm not sure what the status is of
9 this email with Mr. Glassman about The Lion King, if that was a
10 stipulation --
11 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I believe that was precluded.
12 Your Honor's ruling about testimony from attorneys was that the
13 only permissible testimony would have been the email from --
14 the statement by Mr. Glassman about whether testifying would
15 help her case and that all other testimony about attorneys
16 would be precluded.
17 THE COURT: If this is implicated in the motion
18 related to calling the three attorneys, then that was my ruling
19 with respect to that.
20 MS. MENNINGER: I'll have to look back at that, your
21 Honor. That's the only other thing that's coming to mind with
22 respect to Mr. Rossmiller's potential --
23 THE COURT: That series was questioned during the
24 testimony, which may have been my basis.
25 MS. MENNINGER: It may be, your Honor. I just don't
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016758
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document