This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Court and counsel regarding jury deliberation schedules, followed by the Judge reading a specific note from the jury. The note asks for legal clarification on 'Count Four,' specifically questioning if the defendant can be found guilty if she aided in 'Jane's return flight' but not the initial flight to New Mexico where sexual activity was intended to occur.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the deliberation schedule and reading a jury note.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Acknowledging the judge's permission to photograph a jury note.
|
| Jane | Victim/Witness (Pseudonym) |
Subject of a jury question regarding transportation to New Mexico for sexual activity.
|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Subject of the jury's question regarding guilt under Count Four (Ghislaine Maxwell, per case number context).
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer entity responsible for the transcript.
|
|
| DOJ |
Indicated in the Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location mentioned in the jury note regarding a specific flight and alleged illegal activity.
|
"Under Count Four, if the defendant aided in the transportation of Jane's return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico, where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity, can she be found guilty under the second element?"Source
"I don't think telling them what they should do is necessarily the right thing to do."Source
"Counsel, you're welcome to take a photo of it, if that helps."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,383 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document