DOJ-OGR-00017440.jpg

496 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (cross-examination)
File Size: 496 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski (likely a pilot) by Mr. Everdell. The testimony establishes that in the 2000s, Visoski coordinated flight arrangements through Sarah Kellen. The witness confirms that while he received logistical details like date, time, and destination, he was not necessarily informed of the passenger manifest ahead of time.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Visoski Witness/Pilot
Being cross-examined regarding flight scheduling procedures for Epstein.
Mr. Everdell Attorney
Conducting the cross-examination.
Sarah Kellen Associate/Scheduler
Identified as the person Visoski would speak to in the 2000s to arrange flights.
Jeffrey Epstein Principal
The subject requiring flights.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Listed in footer.

Timeline (2 events)

2000s
Routine scheduling of flights for Jeffrey Epstein
Unknown
2022-08-10
Filing of Document 743 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Southern District of New York (implied by case number/reporter)

Relationships (2)

Visoski Professional/Operational Sarah Kellen
Visoski spoke to Kellen to arrange flights.
Visoski Pilot/Principal Jeffrey Epstein
Visoski flew Epstein and received instructions on when/where Epstein needed to go.

Key Quotes (2)

"Q. So in the 2000s, that's the number you would speak to Sarah Kellen on about arranging flights? A. Correct."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017440.jpg
Quote #1
"Q. But you wouldn't necessarily be told who was going to be going on the flight; right? A. Not at all."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017440.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,182 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 743 Filed 08/10/22 Page 78 of 247 206
LBUCmax3 Visoski - cross
1 MR. EVERDELL: Thank you. You can take that down.
2 Q. So in the 2000s, that's the number you would speak to Sarah
3 Kellen on about arranging flights?
4 A. Correct.
5 Q. Now, regardless of who you spoke to about scheduling
6 flights, when you were told that Epstein needed to fly
7 somewhere, you would need to be given certain information about
8 the flight; correct?
9 A. Sure.
10 Q. Like, for example, you would need to be given the date of
11 when Epstein wanted to fly?
12 A. Correct.
13 Q. You would need to be given roughly the time of departure?
14 A. Yes.
15 Q. And you would need to be given the destination where you're
16 going to fly; right?
17 A. Yes. That would be helpful, yes.
18 Q. You might want to follow a flight plan or something like
19 that?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. But you wouldn't necessarily be told who was going to be
22 going on the flight; right?
23 A. Not at all.
24 Q. If you had someone who was particularly important that was
25 going to be on the flight, you might be told ahead of time?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017440

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document