This document is a page from the trial transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim examines Professor Elizabeth Loftus, successfully proffering her as an expert witness in memory science despite objections from prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz. Loftus begins her testimony by explaining to the jury that human memory does not function like a recording device but is a complex reconstruction process.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Conducting direct examination of the witness; proffers witness as an expert.
|
| Professor Elizabeth Loftus | Witness / Expert |
Testifying as an expert in memory science and memory reconstruction.
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Prosecutor |
Noting objections to the expert witness testimony.
|
| The Court (Judge) | Judge |
Presiding over the trial; accepts Loftus as an expert witness.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the case number and reporter location.
|
|
|
Referred to as "this enclosure" by the witness.
|
"One of the things we know about memory is it doesn't work like a recording device."Source
"You don't just record the event and play it back later. The process is much more complex."Source
"I would proffer Professor Elizabeth Loftus as an expert in the field of memory science, the nature of memory reconstruction, and the impact of events upon memory."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,315 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document