This document is page 19 of a legal filing (Case 21-770) dated May 27, 2021, addressing Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal regarding pretrial release and confinement conditions. The text argues that Maxwell failed to prove MDC security protocols interfere with her trial preparation and addresses specific disputes regarding 'nighttime checks' with flashlights and the use of eye coverings. A lengthy footnote clarifies a previous inaccuracy regarding Maxwell's use of an eye mask and defends the Government against accusations of misrepresentation.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Subject of confinement conditions; appealing regarding pretrial release and preparation for trial.
|
| Judge Nathan | District Court Judge |
Recipient of communications from the Government regarding MDC protocols.
|
| Government counsel | Prosecution/Respondent |
Made statements at oral argument regarding routine checks; clarified knowledge about inmate procedures.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MDC |
Metropolitan Detention Center; facility where Maxwell is held; provided information to Government regarding protocols.
|
|
| Government |
The prosecution; responding to Maxwell's complaints and conveying information from MDC.
|
|
| District Court |
The lower court where applications regarding trial preparation should be made.
|
|
| This Court |
The appellate court reviewing the current motion (implied by Case 21-770 header).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Detention center where confinement conditions (flashlight checks) are occurring.
|
"nighttime checks involve shining a flashlight directly into her eyes (as opposed to the ceiling)"Source
"Maxwell availed herself of that process, but in so doing offered no evidence that the MDC’s security protocols are unjustified or interfering with her preparation for trial."Source
"I can’t speak to what is done as to all inmates."Source
"The Government has and will continue to accurately represent the information it receives from the MDC"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,111 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document