DOJ-OGR-00013295.jpg
605 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
605 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Attorneys Rohrbach (Gov) and Sternheim (Defense) argue before the Judge regarding the admissibility of insurance forms and medical billing records related to Mar-a-Lago. The debate centers on whether a form filled out by 'Mr. Roberts' constitutes hearsay and if a witness, Ms. Gill, can testify to practices that occurred before her employment began.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the evidentiary hearing; questioning the verification of insurance forms.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney (Government/Prosecution) |
Arguing that the course of conduct (paying medical bills) validates the insurance evidence.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Attorney (Defense) |
Objecting that the government is asking a witness about practices preceding her employment.
|
| Mr. Roberts | Subject of form/Employee |
Mentioned regarding a statement on an insurance form ('Mr. Roberts' statement on this form') that is being offered fo...
|
| Ms. Gill | Witness |
A witness the government intends to ask about insurance records and verification.
|
| Lieberman | Legal Precedent |
Referenced as a case citation ('the Lieberman case') relevant to the admissibility of the evidence.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mar-a-Lago |
Club/Resort mentioned as the entity providing insurance to an employee.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Transcription service listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer stamp 'DOJ-OGR').
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court hearing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell)
Southern District of New York
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Palm Beach, Florida (implied); cited as the source of insurance coverage.
|
|
|
Southern District of New York (Court jurisdiction).
|
Relationships (2)
Discussion of insurance forms and statements made by Mr. Roberts regarding coverage through Mar-a-Lago.
Rohrbach intends to question Ms. Gill.
Key Quotes (4)
"that person is insured through Mar-a-Lago."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013295.jpg
Quote #1
"It's Mr. Roberts' statement on this form that you're seeking to offer for the truth."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013295.jpg
Quote #2
"it's the course of conduct of paying bills for someone who then receives medical treatment"Source
DOJ-OGR-00013295.jpg
Quote #3
"the government would be asking this witness about a practice that preceded the time period in which she was there."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013295.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,542 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 17 of 262 1722
LC8Cmax1
LC8Cmax1
1 insurance benefits to her, they have verified that information.
2 THE COURT: Well, it's a bit circular. I think the
3 question is, did they do anything to verify the information on
4 the form. The fact that they provided -- that they sent this
5 form and then insurance was provided based on the employee's
6 information, that's the out-of-court statement. It's
7 Mr. Roberts' statement on this form that you're seeking to
8 offer for the truth. So unless there is -- you'll look at the
9 Lieberman case. I think it's directly on point, as I said.
10 MR. ROHRBACH: I'm happy to look at the case and also
11 ask Ms. Gill, your Honor.
12 My point is, I think it's more than just sending the
13 form and then obtaining insurance for someone because their
14 name is on the form, but it's the course of conduct of paying
15 bills for someone who then receives medical treatment because
16 that person is insured through Mar-a-Lago.
17 THE COURT: Well, if she's got information on this
18 employee with respect to that or records, I suppose that's
19 another story.
20 MR. ROHRBACH: I think those records do exist, but
21 I'll just go have a conversation with Ms. Gill about this.
22 THE COURT: Ms. Sternheim.
23 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, the government would be asking
24 this witness about a practice that preceded the time period in
25 which she was there. And the fact of the matter is, requesting
2 THE COURT: Well, it's a bit circular. I think the
3 question is, did they do anything to verify the information on
4 the form. The fact that they provided -- that they sent this
5 form and then insurance was provided based on the employee's
6 information, that's the out-of-court statement. It's
7 Mr. Roberts' statement on this form that you're seeking to
8 offer for the truth. So unless there is -- you'll look at the
9 Lieberman case. I think it's directly on point, as I said.
10 MR. ROHRBACH: I'm happy to look at the case and also
11 ask Ms. Gill, your Honor.
12 My point is, I think it's more than just sending the
13 form and then obtaining insurance for someone because their
14 name is on the form, but it's the course of conduct of paying
15 bills for someone who then receives medical treatment because
16 that person is insured through Mar-a-Lago.
17 THE COURT: Well, if she's got information on this
18 employee with respect to that or records, I suppose that's
19 another story.
20 MR. ROHRBACH: I think those records do exist, but
21 I'll just go have a conversation with Ms. Gill about this.
22 THE COURT: Ms. Sternheim.
23 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, the government would be asking
24 this witness about a practice that preceded the time period in
25 which she was there. And the fact of the matter is, requesting
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013295
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013295
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document