HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013464.jpg

3.19 MB

Extraction Summary

10
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal affidavit/declaration (page from a court filing)
File Size: 3.19 MB
Summary

This document is a page from a legal affidavit, likely by an attorney representing Epstein's victims. It details a taped conversation between Jeffrey Epstein and journalist George Rush, in which Epstein reportedly admitted to crossing the line but claimed his actions warranted only a '$100 fine' and showed no remorse. The document also discusses a retaliatory lawsuit filed by Epstein against attorneys Brad Edwards and Scott Rothstein, and mentions specific allegations regarding a 15-year-old victim (Jane Doe 102) trafficked on Epstein's private plane.

People (10)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Defendant
Accused of sexual abuse; filed retaliatory lawsuits against attorneys; spoke to reporter George Rush.
Jane Doe Plaintiff/Victim
Pursuing civil action against Epstein; alleged victim of sexual molestation.
Affiant/Narrator Attorney
Author of the document; sued by Epstein; represents victims.
Brad Edwards Attorney
Sued by Epstein in a retaliatory lawsuit.
Scott Rothstein Attorney
Sued by Epstein in a retaliatory lawsuit.
L.M. Plaintiff/Victim
Has a civil case pending against Epstein in Florida state court.
George Rush Journalist
Reporter for New York Daily News; interviewed Epstein and taped the conversation.
Jane Doe 102 Plaintiff/Victim
Alleged victim; 15-year-old girl flown on private plane and forced to have sex with Epstein's friends.
Michael Fisten Investigator
Investigator with the affiant's firm; spoke with George Rush.
[Redacted] Victim/Client
Name redacted; listed as a co-defendant in Epstein's retaliatory suit; subject of derogatory remarks by Epstein.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
New York Daily News
Employer of George Rush.
Florida state court
Venue where L.M.'s civil case is pending.
House Oversight Committee
Source of the document (indicated by footer stamp).

Timeline (2 events)

Past
Sexual abuse of Jane Doe 102 (15 year old girl) involving flights and Epstein's friends.
Private plane / National / International
Jeffrey Epstein Jane Doe 102 Epstein's friends
Recently (relative to document)
Epstein filed a lawsuit against the affiant, Brad Edwards, and Scott Rothstein alleging conspiracy/fraud regarding L.M.'s case.
Court (implied)

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location where alleged abuse took place.
Location of pending state court case.

Relationships (3)

Jeffrey Epstein Interview Subject/Journalist George Rush
Epstein spoke personally with him; Rush taped the conversation.
Affiant Employer/Employee Michael Fisten
Michael Fisten, an investigator with my firm.
Jeffrey Epstein Adversarial/Legal Brad Edwards
Epstein filed a lawsuit against Brad Edwards.

Key Quotes (3)

"Mr. Epstein told him that he may have come 'too close to the line' but that he should not have been punished as severely as he was and that his conduct was at most worthy of a $100 fine."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013464.jpg
Quote #1
"Epstein flippantly told George Rush that that case was dismissed, in a way to indicate that the allegations are ridiculous and untrue."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013464.jpg
Quote #2
"Mr. Rush indicated that he taped the conversation between him and Mr. Epstein."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013464.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,122 characters)

present during acts of sexual abuse by Epstein. In any event, ALL of those individuals have also invoked their 5th amendment rights against self-incrimination, and thus have left Plaintiff with no information about what Epstein or other conspirators inside his house were doing during the sexual abuse of Jane Doe and other minors girls. This creates a serious issue for Jane Doe in proving her sexual molestation claim against Epstein. By its nature, sexual molestation takes place in private, with only the abuser and the victim typically available to testify. In this case, Epstein’s abuse of Jane Doe took place in private, with only Epstein and Jane Doe present during the abuse. Jane Doe has no other reasonable avenues of discovery to provide direct proof of claim of sexual abuse by Epstein.
11. Additionally, Mr. Epstein has recently filed a lawsuit against me personally that has no merit whatsoever, a fact known to Mr. Epstein and his attorneys. He filed the lawsuit against Brad Edwards, Scott Rothstein, and [REDACTED] (another Epstein victim of his molestation). That lawsuit implies that L.M.’s civil case against him (currently pending in Florida state court) is fabricated and that [REDACTED] and I have conspired to commit fraud against him (presumably that she made up the case against him, implying that he does not know [REDACTED]. While the present subpoena before the Court has been filed by Jane Doe, the Court should be aware that attorneys representing [REDACTED] may also file a subpoena for the George Rush tape shortly.
12. Despite Mr. Epstein and all of his co-conspirators, asserting a 5th amendment privilege against self-incrimination, George Rush of the New York Daily news did contact me to inform me that Mr. Epstein spoke personally with him about issues related to the various charges of sex abuse against him.
13. Paraphrasing from memory of my conversation with Mr. Rush, Mr. Epstein told him that he may have come “too close to the line” but that he should not have been punished as severely as he was and that his conduct was at most worthy of a $100 fine. This is a statement that shows two things of great importance to Jane Doe’s pending civil action. First, it is in effect an admission by Epstein of his liability to Jane Doe for sexually abusing her. Jane Doe does not have any other admission of Epstein of his sexual abuse of her and Epstein has filed an answer to Jane Doe’s complaint that has the functional effect of denying abuse of her. Jane Doe has diligently pursued all possible ways of obtaining an admission from Epstein of his molestation of Jane Doe without success. Second, the statement to Mr. Rush is a clear demonstration that Epstein lacks remorse for committing felony child molestation against Jane Doe. This will be a central issue in the punitive damages case against Epstein at trial. Here again, Jane Doe has diligently pursued all possible ways of obtaining a statement from Epstein about his lack of remorse for abusing Jane Doe without success. There are no other reasonable means of obtaining a statement from Epstein on these subjects.
14. Mr. Rush also told me that Mr. Epstein spoke specifically about one of my clients, [REDACTED] and he made derogatory remarks about her.
15. Additionally, Mr. Rush said that Epstein spoke directly about another civil case that was filed against him (Jane Doe 102 v. Epstein); that case alleges that Epstein repeatedly sexually abused a 15 year old girl, forced her to have sex with his friends and flew her on his private plane nationally and internationally for the purposes of sexually molesting and abusing her. Epstein flippantly told George Rush that that case was dismissed, in a way to indicate that the allegations are ridiculous and untrue.
16. Mr. Rush indicated that he taped the conversation between him and Mr. Epstein.
17. Mr. Rush also spoke at length to Michael Fisten, an investigator with my firm that was assisting with the investigation of the case. Mr. Fisten reported to me shortly after the conversation with Mr. Rush that he had such a conversation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013464

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document