This document is page 16 of a court filing (Document 653) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), dated April 1, 2022. The text discusses the Court's evaluation of 'Juror 50,' who failed to disclose a history of childhood sexual abuse on a jury questionnaire. The Court concludes that while the Juror's answers were incorrect, they were not 'deliberately inaccurate,' accepting the Juror's testimony (given under immunity) that he rushed through the form carelessly. The Court cites the Juror's demeanor and consistency as reasons for crediting his testimony.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror 50 | Juror / Witness |
Subject of a hearing regarding inaccurate questionnaire answers; testified under immunity about failing to disclose c...
|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Party arguing a specific interpretation of McDonough (legal precedent) regarding the juror's answers. (Contextually G...
|
| The Court | Judge / Judicial Body |
Evaluating Juror 50's credibility and ruling on whether the inaccurate answers were deliberate.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated by footer stamp 'DOJ-OGR-00010339'
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecution team offering an interpretation of the legal standard.
|
"Juror 50 answered “No” on the questionnaire, but testified that the correct answer would have been “Yes (self)” for Questions 25 and 48 and “Yes (friend or family member)” for Question 49."Source
"Those three inaccurate answers all stem from Juror 50’s failure to disclose that he was sexually abused as a child."Source
"Court concludes that Juror 50’s answers to the questionnaire, while incorrect, were not deliberately inaccurate."Source
"He faces the possibility of perjury charges if he testified falsely at the hearing."Source
"He was apologetic for his carelessness."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,032 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document