DOJ-OGR-00020517.jpg

1.39 MB

Extraction Summary

9
People
2
Organizations
4
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court docket / case log
File Size: 1.39 MB
Summary

This document is a court docket page (Page 31 of 92) listing entries from April 16 to April 19, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details several filings by Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca) including motions to dismiss counts of the superseding indictment and suppress evidence. Key orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan schedule an arraignment for the S2 Superseding Indictment for April 23, 2021, at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, sever perjury counts for a separate trial, and request government intent regarding the use of disputed subpoenaed documents.

People (9)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of multiple motions to dismiss and orders regarding arraignment on superseding indictments.
Christian Everdell Attorney
Filed multiple Reply Memorandums of Law in support of Maxwell on 04/16/2021.
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Signed multiple orders regarding arraignment, redactions, and scheduling; recipient of letters.
Laura A. Menninger Attorney
Sent a Joint Letter regarding redactions on April 1, 2021.
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Attorney
Sent a letter responding to the Government's letter regarding a Rule 17 Subpoena.
Alison Moe AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Filed a Letter Motion requesting extension of time.
Maurene Comey AUSA
Listed on Letter Motion requesting extension of time.
Lara Pomerantz AUSA
Listed on Letter Motion requesting extension of time.
Andrew Rohrbach AUSA
Listed on Letter Motion requesting extension of time.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse
Location for the scheduled arraignment.
USA
Government entity filing documents against Maxwell.

Timeline (1 events)

04/23/2021
Arraignment on the S2 Superseding Indictment
Courtroom 24B, Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, New York, NY
Ghislaine Maxwell Judge Alison J. Nathan

Locations (4)

Location Context
Venue for arraignment proceedings.
Specific room for the arraignment.
Overflow room for video feed.
Overflow room for video feed.

Relationships (3)

Ghislaine Maxwell Attorney-Client Christian Everdell
Everdell files multiple memorandums of law in support of Maxwell.
Ghislaine Maxwell Attorney-Client Laura A. Menninger
Menninger files joint letter on behalf of Maxwell.
Ghislaine Maxwell Attorney-Client Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
Pagliuca files letter on behalf of Maxwell regarding subpoenas.

Key Quotes (4)

"The Defendant contends in those motions that the Government obtained by subpoena documents covered by a protective order in violation of her rights against unreasonable searches and seizures, against self-incrimination, and to due process of law."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020517.jpg
Quote #1
"The Court requires information from the Government for scheduling purposes."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020517.jpg
Quote #2
"The proceeding will take place in Courtroom 24B of the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020517.jpg
Quote #3
"The Court denied the Defendant's motions to dismiss the S1 superseding indictment in whole or in part and granted the Defendant's motion to sever the perjury counts for a separate trial."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020517.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,650 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page31 of 92
04/16/2021 | 210 | REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 121 MOTION to Dismiss Either Count One Or Count Three of the Superseding Indictment as Multiplicitous. . (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 04/16/2021)
04/16/2021 | 211 | REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 125 MOTION to Dismiss the Superseding Indictment as it was Obtained in Violation of the Sixth Amendment. . (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 04/16/2021)
04/16/2021 | 212 | REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 139 MOTION to Suppress Under the Fourth Amendment, Martindell, and the Fifth Amendment All Evidence Obtained from the Governments Subpoena to REDACTED and to Dismiss Counts Five And Six. . (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 04/16/2021)
04/16/2021 | 213 | REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 123 MOTION to Dismiss Counts One through Four of the Superseding Indictment for Lack of Specificity. . (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 04/16/2021)
04/19/2021 | 214 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: An arraignment on the S2 Superseding Indictment is scheduled to take place on April 23, 2021 at 2:30 p.m. The proceeding will take place in Courtroom 24B of the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY. Given significant public interest, a video feed of the proceeding will be available for viewing in the Jury Assembly Room and Courtroom 9C at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse. The use of any electronic devices during the proceeding in either the Courtroom or the overflow rooms is strictly prohibited. SO ORDERED. (Arraignment set for 4/23/2021 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 24B, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Alison J. Nathan) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/19/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 04/19/2021)
04/19/2021 | 215 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: IT IS ORDERED that any redaction requests for documents not already filed on the public docket must be made by April 21, 2021. Alternatively, the parties may file the unredacted versions by that date. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/19/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 04/19/2021)
04/19/2021 | 216 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: In its April 16, 2021 Opinion, the Court denied the Defendant's motions to dismiss the S1 superseding indictment in whole or in part and granted the Defendant' s motion to sever the perjury counts for a separate trial. Dkt. No. 207. The Court will try the non-perjury counts first. As the Court noted in its Opinion, it has not yet resolved the Defendant's two motions to suppress evidence. See Dkt. Nos. 133, 139. The Defendant contends in those motions that the Government obtained by subpoena documents covered by a protective order in violation of her rights against unreasonable searches and seizures, against self-incrimination, and to due process of law. The motions seek, at minimum, an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the Government knowingly misrepresented facts to procure an order modifying the protective order. The Court requires information from the Government for scheduling purposes. The Government is ORDERED to inform the Court by letter docketed on ECF no later than April 20, 2021, whether it intends to use any of the documents subject to the pending motions to suppress in the trial of the non-perjury counts in this case. If the Government does not intend to use any of the documents subject to the pending motions to suppress in the trial of the non-perjury counts, the Court will defer consideration of those motions until it has scheduled the trial of the perjury counts. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/19/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 04/19/2021)
04/19/2021 | 217 | JOINT LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Laura A. Menninger dated April 1, 2021 re: Joint Letter Concerning Redactions to Omnibus Response & Exhibit 11 (Menninger, Laura) (Entered: 04/19/2021)
04/19/2021 | 218 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated April 15, 2021 re: Response to Government's April 5, 2021 Letter re. Ms. Maxwell's Rule 17 Subpoena (Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/19/2021)
04/19/2021 | 219 | LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated April 19, 2021 re: request for extension of time to respond to the Court's April 19, 2021 Order . Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Moe, Alison) (Entered:
DOJ-OGR-00020517

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document