DOJ-OGR-00020560.jpg

1.31 MB

Extraction Summary

13
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court docket sheet / public access to court electronic records (pacer)
File Size: 1.31 MB

People (13)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the court orders and letters
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Presiding judge issuing orders and receiving letters
Bobbi C. Sternheim Defense Attorney
Author of letters to the judge on behalf of Maxwell
Maurene Comey AUSA (Assistant United States Attorney)
Prosecutor submitting letters and motions
Alison Moe AUSA
Prosecutor submitting letters and motions
Lara Pomerantz AUSA
Prosecutor submitting letters and motions
Andrew Rohrbach AUSA
Prosecutor submitting letters and motions
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Defense Attorney
Author of letter regarding Scarola, Edwards, and Glassman
Jack Scarola Attorney/Individual
Subject of a letter from Jeffrey Pagliuca
Brad Edwards Attorney/Individual
Subject of a letter from Jeffrey Pagliuca
Robert Glassman Attorney/Individual
Subject of a letter from Jeffrey Pagliuca
Dr. Loftus Witness (Expert)
Subject of testimony preclusion motion; defense ordered to respond regarding her
Alexander Hamilton Witness (Expert)
Subject of testimony preclusion motion; defense ordered to respond regarding him

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
USA
United States of America (Prosecution/Government)
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated by footer)
Court
United States District Court

Timeline (3 events)

12/14/2021
Order issued for Government to respond to Defense letter regarding anticipated witnesses (deadline 10:00 p.m.) and for Defense to provide witness order copy (deadline 12:00 p.m.).
Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan USA Defense
12/15/2021
Memorandum Opinion & Order denying Defense motion to permit three anticipated witnesses to testify under pseudonym.
Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan Ghislaine Maxwell Defense Witnesses
12/15/2021
Order requiring Defense response to Government motion to preclude testimony of Dr. Loftus (by 7:45 p.m.) and Alexander Hamilton (by 12/16 at 7:00 a.m.).
Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan Dr. Loftus Alexander Hamilton

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location where sealed document (Doc 543) was placed

Relationships (4)

Ghislaine Maxwell Attorney-Client Bobbi C. Sternheim
Letter by Ghislaine Maxwell... from Bobbi C. Sternheim
Ghislaine Maxwell Attorney-Client Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
Letter by Ghislaine Maxwell... from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
Dr. Loftus Defense Witness Ghislaine Maxwell
Defense is ORDERED to submit a response... with respect to Dr. Loftus
Alexander Hamilton Defense Witness Ghislaine Maxwell
Defense is ORDERED to submit a response... with respect to Alexander Hamilton

Key Quotes (3)

"The Defense's primary contention is that some form of anonymity for its witnesses is justified by the same reasons that the Court permitted three alleged victims and two related government witnesses to testify under pseudonyms. The Court disagrees with this basic premise and denies the Defense's motion."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020560.jpg
Quote #1
"the court has a duty to protect a witness "from questions which go beyond the bounds of proper cross-examination merely to harass, annoy or humiliate him""
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020560.jpg
Quote #2
"The Defense is ORDERED to submit a response as follows: - A response to the motion with respect to Dr. Loftus by today, December 15, 2021, at 7:45 p.m."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020560.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,389 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page74 of 92
(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/12/2021)
12/12/2021 | 540 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C. Sternheim dated 12/12/2021 re: Order of Defense Witnesses (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 12/12/2021)
12/13/2021 | 541 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated December 13, 2021 re: Privilege stipulation Document filed by USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/13/2021)
12/14/2021 | 542 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the Defense's letter dated December 13, 2021, regarding anticipated witnesses. The Government is ORDERED to submit a response no later than today, December 14, 2021, at 10:00 p.m. The Defense is FURTHER ORDERED to provide a copy of its anticipated witness order to the Court no later than today, December 14, 2021, at 12:00 p.m. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/14/2021)(bw) (Entered: 12/14/2021)
12/14/2021 | 543 | SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (jus) (Entered: 12/14/2021)
12/14/2021 | 544 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated December 13, 2021 re: Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards and Robert Glassman (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 (Filed Under Seal))(Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 12/15/2021)
12/15/2021 | 545 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated December 14, 2021 re: Testimony from Victim Counsel Document filed by USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/15/2021)
12/15/2021 | 546 | LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated December 15, 2021 re: Proposed redactions to Privilege Letters. Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/15/2021)
12/15/2021 | 547 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C. Sternheim dated 12/15/2021 re: Opposition to restriction on expert testimony (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 12/15/2021)
12/15/2021 | 548 | MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Defense on December 12, 2021, moved to permit three anticipated witnesses to testify under a pseudonym or their first names only. The Government filed a letter opposing this request on December 14, 2021. The Defense's primary contention is that some form of anonymity for its witnesses is justified by the same reasons that the Court permitted three alleged victims and two related government witnesses to testify under pseudonyms. The Court disagrees with this basic premise and denies the Defense's motion....[*** See this Memorandum Opinion & Order ***]... Last, the Court emphasizes that while it currently denies the Defense's motion, the Defense may of course raise, and the Court will consider, objections that particular lines of questioning into witnesses' backgrounds or lives are irrelevant, cumulative, intended to harass, or otherwise inappropriate. See, e.g., Smith v. Illinois, 390 U.S. 129, 133 (1968) (emphasizing that even when anonymity is not warranted, the court has a duty to protect a witness "from questions which go beyond the bounds of proper cross-examination merely to harass, annoy or humiliate him"). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/15/2021)(bw) (Entered: 12/16/2021)
12/15/2021 | 694 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the Government's motion to preclude certain testimony of defense witnesses, dated December 15, 2021. The Defense is ORDERED to submit a response as follows: - A response to the motion with respect to Dr. Loftus by today, December 15, 2021, at 7:45 p.m. - A response to the motion with respect to Alexander Hamilton by tomorrow, December 16, 2021, at 7:00 a.m. - A response to the motion with respect to the other anticipated witnesses by tomorrow, December 16, 2021, at 5:00 p.m. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/15/2021)(bw) (Entered: 06/29/2022)
12/16/2021 | 551 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court is in receipt of the parties' joint letter regarding the admission of prior inconsistent statements. The parties' letter notes "that
DOJ-OGR-00020560

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document