DOJ-OGR-00016478.jpg

586 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 586 KB
Summary

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves attorneys (Ms. Moe and Ms. Sternheim) and the Judge discussing the trial schedule, specifically focusing on jury deliberations, avoiding delays, and a charging conference scheduled for the 18th. The Court emphasizes the need for efficiency and being respectful of the jurors' time while preparing for closing arguments.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ms. Moe Attorney
Speaker in the transcript arguing regarding jury timing and deliberation.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the trial, managing the schedule and jury.
Ms. Sternheim Attorney (Defense)
Addressed by the Court regarding her concerns; begins speaking at the end of the page.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Transcription service listed in footer
DOJ
Department of Justice (implied by DOJ-OGR stamp)

Timeline (2 events)

The 18th
Charging conference
Courtroom
The Court Counsel
Unknown (Discussion date)
Discussion regarding jury deliberation schedule and closing arguments
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and case number format

Relationships (1)

Ms. Sternheim Attorney/Judge The Court
Court addresses Ms. Sternheim directly regarding her concerns.

Key Quotes (3)

"I think we should be respectful of the jury's time."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016478.jpg
Quote #1
"And dismissing them for yet another extremely lengthy break, I think, runs contrary to the efficient way the Court has run this trial."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016478.jpg
Quote #2
"I suppose my point was since we're doing the charging conference on the 18th, I do want counsel to be prepared to turn to closings the day following the completion of the evidence."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016478.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,491 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 262 of 267 2290
LCAVMAX8
1 be a hardship to keep them indefinitely and have them come back
2 and wait a week to deliberate on a case that's ready to be
3 adjudicated.
4 So, again, I don't think the Court needs to reach this
5 issue given the timing; but if the jury was prepared to sit
6 this entire week and hear evidence, there's no reason they
7 couldn't also be here and be deliberating. I think we should
8 be respectful of the jury's time. And dismissing them for yet
9 another extremely lengthy break, I think, runs contrary to the
10 efficient way the Court has run this trial. And if this case
11 can be resolved --
12 THE COURT: Well, thank you. That's not what they
13 usually call it.
14 MS. MOE: And I think, you know, the best way to be
15 respectful of the jurors' time is to let them have the case.
16 THE COURT: Okay. It's premature. We'll see where we
17 are. My thinking was -- I think we'll see where we are.
18 I suppose my point was since we're doing the charging
19 conference on the 18th, I do want counsel to be prepared to
20 turn to closings the day following the completion of the
21 evidence. We'll see where that is and the like. But I don't
22 want to keep starting and stopping. So we'll use our time, but
23 I'm mindful of your concern, Ms. Sternheim, and we'll see where
24 we are.
25 MS. STERNHEIM: I would just like to add that we
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016478

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document