DOJ-OGR-00018360.jpg
600 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
600 KB
Summary
This is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell). The text details a legal argument regarding the redaction of documents to protect the identity of a person referred to as 'Jane' from being cross-referenced with public records on PACER. The Judge instructs the attorneys (Ms. Moe and Mr. Rohrbach) to find a middle ground that protects witness privacy while acknowledging facts already in the public trial transcript before the jury enters.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, instructing attorneys on redactions and managing the jury.
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney |
Responds to the judge regarding the instructions.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney |
Requests time to print and sign a stipulation.
|
| Jane | Witness/Subject |
Referenced as the person whose identifiers need protection via redaction.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| PACER |
Mentioned as a tool people use to find public versions of documents.
|
|
| ECF |
Mentioned as a source for docket entries.
|
|
| DOJ |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Discussion regarding redactions of 'Jane's' identifiers before jurors are brought in.
Southern District Court
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by 'this district' and the reporter's name (Southern District of New York).
|
Relationships (2)
Mr. Rohrbach addresses The Court as 'Your Honor'.
Key Quotes (4)
"So the redactions we would propose would be substantial and perhaps beyond recognition in order to avoid that problem."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018360.jpg
Quote #1
"in order to redact it to make sure someone couldn't troll around PACER and find the public version, you would have to redact essentially everything"Source
DOJ-OGR-00018360.jpg
Quote #2
"So if information is already public, then redacting it -- but you'll look and see if there is some appropriate middle ground that would ensure the continued privacy of the witness consistent with the law."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018360.jpg
Quote #3
"We'll bring them in."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018360.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,517 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 23 of 261 1163
LC6Cmax1
LC6Cmax1
1 them against other public records, which are unredacted and
2 have Jane's identifiers. So the redactions we would propose
3 would be substantial and perhaps beyond recognition in order to
4 avoid that problem.
5 For example, in a civil case in this district, if you
6 were print out from ECF the full docket entry and it were a
7 public document that had identifiers for the person who filed
8 that civil suit, in order to redact it to make sure someone
9 couldn't troll around PACER and find the public version, you
10 would have to redact essentially everything, and that's the
11 problem here. The same is true for the copy --
12 THE COURT: Please just take a look, see if there is
13 an agreement that you'll propose to me, taking into account
14 also what is already public regarding the document in the trial
15 transcript.
16 So, one of the lessons, too, is that simply you can't
17 just look in isolation. So if information is already public,
18 then redacting it -- but you'll look and see if there is some
19 appropriate middle ground that would ensure the continued
20 privacy of the witness consistent with the law.
21 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. Thank you.
22 THE COURT: Thank you. And we have all of our jurors.
23 Everybody ready? Okay. We'll bring them in.
24 MR. ROHRBACH: Your Honor, we need just a minute or
25 two to print and sign the stipulation.
2 have Jane's identifiers. So the redactions we would propose
3 would be substantial and perhaps beyond recognition in order to
4 avoid that problem.
5 For example, in a civil case in this district, if you
6 were print out from ECF the full docket entry and it were a
7 public document that had identifiers for the person who filed
8 that civil suit, in order to redact it to make sure someone
9 couldn't troll around PACER and find the public version, you
10 would have to redact essentially everything, and that's the
11 problem here. The same is true for the copy --
12 THE COURT: Please just take a look, see if there is
13 an agreement that you'll propose to me, taking into account
14 also what is already public regarding the document in the trial
15 transcript.
16 So, one of the lessons, too, is that simply you can't
17 just look in isolation. So if information is already public,
18 then redacting it -- but you'll look and see if there is some
19 appropriate middle ground that would ensure the continued
20 privacy of the witness consistent with the law.
21 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. Thank you.
22 THE COURT: Thank you. And we have all of our jurors.
23 Everybody ready? Okay. We'll bring them in.
24 MR. ROHRBACH: Your Honor, we need just a minute or
25 two to print and sign the stipulation.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018360
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document