032.pdf
120 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order
File Size:
120 KB
Summary
Court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of USA v. Tova Noel and Michael Thomas. Judge Analisa Torres orders a motion filed by defendant Michael Thomas stricken from the docket because it contained 'Protected Material' in violation of a previous protective order. The defendant is directed to refile the motion in compliance with the order.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Analisa Torres | United States District Judge |
Issued the order striking the defendant's filing.
|
| Michael Thomas | Defendant |
Defendant who filed a motion containing protected material which was subsequently ordered stricken.
|
| Tova Noel | Defendant |
Named as a co-defendant in the case caption.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Court where the case is being heard.
|
|
| United States of America |
Plaintiff/Prosecution in the case.
|
|
| Government |
Party that designated the material as 'Protected Material'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-04-03
Judge Analisa Torres orders Defendant Michael Thomas's filing (ECF No. 31) stricken from the docket for violating a protective order regarding protected material.
Southern District of New York
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the court and where the order was signed.
|
Relationships (2)
Listed together as Defendants in the case caption 'TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL THOMAS'.
Judge Torres is issuing an order regarding a filing by Defendant Thomas.
Key Quotes (3)
"The motion filed by Defendant Michael Thomas at ECF No. 31 contains as an attachment material that was designated by the Government as 'Protected Material' pursuant to the protective order entered by the Court."Source
032.pdf
Quote #1
"Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant's filing be stricken from the docket."Source
032.pdf
Quote #2
"It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall refile the motion only in compliance with the terms of the Protective Order."Source
032.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,139 characters)
Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT Document 32 Filed 04/03/20 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
-against-
TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL THOMAS,
Defendants.
Defendants.
ANALISA TORRES, District Judge:
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 4/3/2020
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 4/3/2020
19 Cr. 830-2 (AT)
ORDER
The motion filed by Defendant Michael Thomas at ECF No. 31 contains as an attachment
material that was designated by the Government as "Protected Material" pursuant to the
protective order entered by the Court. ECF No. 16. Under the terms of that order, Protected
Material may only be filed under seal or on reasonable notice to the Government, to allow the
parties to confer on its appropriate treatment. Id. ¶ 5. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that
Defendant's filing be stricken from the docket. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall
refile the motion only in compliance with the terms of the Protective Order.
material that was designated by the Government as "Protected Material" pursuant to the
protective order entered by the Court. ECF No. 16. Under the terms of that order, Protected
Material may only be filed under seal or on reasonable notice to the Government, to allow the
parties to confer on its appropriate treatment. Id. ¶ 5. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that
Defendant's filing be stricken from the docket. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall
refile the motion only in compliance with the terms of the Protective Order.
The Clerk of Court is directed to strike the filing at ECF No. 31 from the docket.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 3, 2020
New York, New York
New York, New York
[Signature]
ANALISA TORRES
United States District Judge
ANALISA TORRES
United States District Judge
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document