This document is a legal affidavit filed on November 3, 2010, in the case of M.J. v. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The affiant, Richard Barnett, states that he was present at Epstein's residence at 9 East 71st Street, NYC, for the entire day of October 8, 2010. He testifies that no individual named 'Mark' worked, resided, was present, or received a subpoena at that location on that date.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Richard Barnett | Affiant |
Swears to being present at Epstein's NY property on Oct 8, 2010 and denies the presence of an individual named Mark.
|
| M.J. | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in the civil case against Epstein and Kellen.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Defendant in the lawsuit; owner of the property at 9 East 71st Street.
|
| Sarah Kellen | Defendant |
Co-defendant in the lawsuit.
|
| Mark | Subject of Inquiry |
Individual alleged to have been present or served a subpoena at the property, which Barnett denies.
|
| Harry I. Beller | Notary Public |
Notarized the affidavit in New York.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of Florida |
Court where the case is filed.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Epstein's residence; location where Barnett claims to have been all day on Oct 8, 2010.
|
|
|
County where the Notary is qualified.
|
"I was on the premises of 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York, the entire day of October 8, 2010."Source
"On October 8, 2010, no individual by the name of 'Mark' worked, resided or was present on the premises of 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York."Source
"On October 8, 2010, no individual by the name of 'Mark' received a subpoena at 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,365 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document