Trove
Sign In Sign Up

EFTA00034650.pdf

56.1 KB
← Back to List View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email chain / internal bureau of prisons correspondence
File Size: 56.1 KB
Summary

An internal email chain among Bureau of Prisons staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York dated July 24, 2019. The correspondence concerns a dispute over which staff member should write a report regarding an inmate (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein) following an 'incident' and a Suicide Risk Assessment (SRA) conducted the previous day. One staff member is criticized for refusing to do the work or feeling incompetent.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Chief Psychologist Chief Psychologist, MCC New York
Sender/Recipient in email chain, name redacted in signature block
Lt. [Redacted] Lieutenant (BOP)
Mentioned as a source of information regarding the incident
[Redacted Female Staff Member] BOP Staff/Psychology Dept
Subject of complaint regarding refusal to work; saw 'him' for SRA
Him / The Inmate Inmate (Contextually Jeffrey Epstein)
Subject of the SRA and the incident mentioned

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
U.S. Department of Justice
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC)

Timeline (2 events)

2019-07-23
Suicide Risk Assessment (SRA)
MCC New York
Inmate (Epstein) Psychology Staff Member
2019-07-23
The Incident (Contextually Epstein's first suicide attempt/injury)
MCC New York
Inmate (Epstein)
View

Locations (2)

Location Context
Metropolitan Correctional Center, New York, New York 10007
New York, NY

Relationships (2)

Chief Psychologist → Superior/Subordinate → Staff Member (She)
Discussion about competence and assigning work
Staff Member (She) → Professional/Medical → Inmate (Epstein)
Saw him for SRA (Suicide Risk Assessment)

Key Quotes (3)

"How can she refuse to do work. IF she doesn't feel competent enough to do something, she should not be working her..."
Source
EFTA00034650.pdf
Quote #1
"It seems more relevant for you to do this report since you saw him yesterday for the SRA."
Source
EFTA00034650.pdf
Quote #2
"Will [Redacted] take care of this? Since she saw him for the SRA yesterday, closest to the incident?"
Source
EFTA00034650.pdf
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,165 characters)

which is why i just went back at [REDACTED] on it - i'm sure you heard me
>>> [REDACTED] 7/24/2019 8:06 AM >>>
How can she refuse to do work. IF she doesn't feel competent enough to do something, she should not be working her...
SO we have to teach for her and now we have to do this also...
>>> [REDACTED] 7/24/2019 7:56 AM >>>
[REDACTED]: Please see attached and below from [REDACTED] and Lt. [REDACTED]. It seems more relevant for you to do this report since you saw him yesterday for the SRA.
>>> [REDACTED] 7/24/2019 7:54 AM >>>
send it to her
[REDACTED]
Chief Psychologist
U.S. Department of Justice/
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Metropolitan Correctional Center
[REDACTED]
New York, New York 10007
Office: [REDACTED]
>>> [REDACTED] 7/24/2019 7:51 AM >>>
Will [REDACTED] take care of this? Since she saw him for the SRA yesterday, closest to the incident? Seems more relevant for her than I.
Do you agree?
>>> [REDACTED] 7/24/2019 7:37 AM >>>
[REDACTED]
Chief Psychologist
U.S. Department of Justice/
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Metropolitan Correctional Center
[REDACTED]
New York, New York 10007
Office: [REDACTED]
CONFIDENTIAL
SDNY_00011850
EFTA00034650
View Original PDF

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document