DOJ-OGR-00011535.jpg
625 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (sentencing/hearing)
File Size:
625 KB
Summary
This document is page 16 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on July 22, 2022. The judge is ruling on defense objections to the Presentence Investigation Report. The court overrules objections regarding findings that records from the 2005 Palm Beach search prove Epstein received sexualized massages from minors (2001-2004) and affirms the defendant's responsibility for victimizing additional minors. It also addresses the inclusion of a victim impact statement from a survivor named 'Kate'.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Perpetrator |
Mentioned in Paragraph 82 as receiving sexualized massages from minors between 2001 and 2004.
|
| The Defendant | Defendant (Implied Ghislaine Maxwell based on case number) |
Subject of the hearing; judge rules she is responsible for the victimization of additional minor victims.
|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Addressed by the judge regarding a continuing objection to Paragraph 83.
|
| Kate | Victim/Survivor |
Subject of Paragraph 85 regarding her status under CVRA and her victim impact statement.
|
| The Judge | Presiding Official |
Speaker in the text, overruling objections and making findings based on the trial record.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
|
|
| Probation Department |
Adopted the government's suggestion to revise Paragraph 83.
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecution; made suggestions regarding the wording of the victimization charges.
|
|
| US District Court (Southern District of New York) |
Implied by case number format and reporter location.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2001-2004
Sexualized massages provided by additional minors to Epstein
Palm Beach residence (implied)
Jeffrey Epstein
Minors
2005
Search of the Palm Beach residence
Palm Beach residence
Jeffrey Epstein (implied target)
Law Enforcement
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where records were recovered during a 2005 search revealing abuse of minors.
|
Relationships (3)
Text states minors provided Epstein with sexualized massages between 2001 and 2004.
Judge rules defendant is responsible for the victimization of additional minor victims.
Everdell is addressed as the counsel making objections on behalf of the defendant.
Key Quotes (4)
"records recovered from the Palm Beach residence during the 2005 search reveal that additional minors provided Epstein with sexualized massages between 2001 and 2004."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011535.jpg
Quote #1
"The trial record including message pads, phone book entries, and testimony of witnesses establishes by a preponderance that the information contained in this paragraph is accurate."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011535.jpg
Quote #2
"revised the paragraph to assert that the defendant is responsible for the victimization of additional minor victims."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011535.jpg
Quote #3
"We have litigated the question of Kate's ability to make a statement here."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011535.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,569 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 16 of 101 16
M6SQmax1
M6SQmax1
1 in the abuse of these individuals.
2 Paragraph 82, the objection is to the assertion that
3 the records recovered from the Palm Beach residence during the
4 2005 search reveal that additional minors provided Epstein with
5 sexualized massages between 2001 and 2004. Again, I overrule
6 the objection. The trial record including message pads, phone
7 book entries, and testimony of witnesses establishes by a
8 preponderance that the information contained in this paragraph
9 is accurate.
10 Paragraph 83, so there was a revision here. I'm not
11 sure if there is a continuing objection, Mr. Everdell. The
12 previous objection was to the assertion that the defendant is
13 responsible for the victimization of untold number of other
14 victims. The probation department adopted the government's
15 suggestion, revised the paragraph to assert that the defendant
16 is responsible for the victimization of additional minor
17 victims. To the extent there is a continuing objection, I
18 overrule it for the reasons stated regarding paragraphs 27 and
19 28.
20 Paragraph 85 is an objection to the inclusion of
21 Kate's victim impact statement and her status under the CVRA.
22 We have litigated the question of Kate's ability to make a
23 statement here. I believe that defense's ultimate position was
24 that with the requested redactions, there were no objections to
25 her making a statement. Do I have that right?
2 Paragraph 82, the objection is to the assertion that
3 the records recovered from the Palm Beach residence during the
4 2005 search reveal that additional minors provided Epstein with
5 sexualized massages between 2001 and 2004. Again, I overrule
6 the objection. The trial record including message pads, phone
7 book entries, and testimony of witnesses establishes by a
8 preponderance that the information contained in this paragraph
9 is accurate.
10 Paragraph 83, so there was a revision here. I'm not
11 sure if there is a continuing objection, Mr. Everdell. The
12 previous objection was to the assertion that the defendant is
13 responsible for the victimization of untold number of other
14 victims. The probation department adopted the government's
15 suggestion, revised the paragraph to assert that the defendant
16 is responsible for the victimization of additional minor
17 victims. To the extent there is a continuing objection, I
18 overrule it for the reasons stated regarding paragraphs 27 and
19 28.
20 Paragraph 85 is an objection to the inclusion of
21 Kate's victim impact statement and her status under the CVRA.
22 We have litigated the question of Kate's ability to make a
23 statement here. I believe that defense's ultimate position was
24 that with the requested redactions, there were no objections to
25 her making a statement. Do I have that right?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. .
.
.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011535
.
.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011535
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document