This document appears to be a printout of an email correspondence or draft response between scientists, likely involving Peter Richerson ('pjr') and an unnamed evolutionary biologist (the author writing in caps). The text contains a heated academic debate regarding the validity of 'cultural argumentation' versus 'genetic' or evolutionary biology explanations for human behavior, specifically citing kinship, grandmother investment, and honour killings. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was obtained during a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the scientific community.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| pjr | Correspondent (Sender of highlighted text) |
Likely Peter J. Richerson based on citation and initials. Discussing cultural institutions and kinship.
|
| Haig | Mentioned Scientist |
Referenced by pjr regarding kinship theories (Likely David Haig).
|
| Rob | Researcher |
Referenced regarding a website/argument (Likely Rob Boyd).
|
| Sarah | Researcher |
Referenced regarding a website/argument (Likely Sarah Mathew).
|
| Mathew, S. | Author (Cited) |
Cited in the bibliography section.
|
| Boyd, R. | Author (Cited) |
Cited in the bibliography section.
|
| Van Veelen, M. | Author (Cited) |
Cited in the bibliography section.
|
| P. J. Richerson | Editor (Cited) |
Cited as editor of 'CulturalEvolution'.
|
| M. Christiansen | Editor (Cited) |
Cited as editor of 'CulturalEvolution'.
|
| Peter | Subject of critique |
The respondent critiques 'Peter's bias' regarding cultural argumentation.
|
| Author (Unidentified in text) | Respondent |
The person writing in all caps, critiquing cultural theory and discussing genetic investment and honour killings.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MIT Press |
Publisher of the cited book 'CulturalEvolution'.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Indicated by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of MIT Press.
|
|
|
Location where the author gave a talk.
|
"IF THIS IS TRUE... THEN I HAVE WASTED 40 YEARS OF MY LIFE ON THESE TOPICS."Source
"THE MORE GENERAL PROBLEM WITH PETER’S BIAS IS THAT SO LITTLE OF INTEREST HAS EMERGED FROM CULTURAL ARGUMENTATION. CONTRAST GENETIC."Source
"NOTHING OF USE FROM CULTURAL “THEORY” BUT A POWERFUL ARGUMENT BASED ON THE EFFECTS OF REPEATED FIRST COUSIN MARRIAGES IN MUSLIM SOCIETIES"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,054 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document