This document is a letter from David Pegg of The Guardian newspaper to an unnamed individual, strongly implied to be Jeffrey Epstein, dated just before January 12, 2015. The letter lists several points for comment before an article's publication, including the recipient's 2008 conviction for procuring minors, associations with Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Kevin Spacey, and financial links to Leslie Wexner. It sets a firm deadline for a response and specifies what constitutes a substantive reply.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Unnamed recipient (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein) | Recipient of the letter |
The letter is addressed to a 'you' who pleaded guilty in 2008 to solicitation of prostitution and procuring minors, w...
|
| Mr Leslie Wexner | Associate |
Mentioned as being linked to the recipient's accounts.
|
| Bill Clinton | Associate |
The recipient is described as being 'closely associated' with him. The recipient also made contributions to the Clint...
|
| Prince Andrew | Associate |
The recipient is described as being 'closely associated' with him.
|
| Kevin Spacey | Associate |
The recipient is described as being 'closely associated' with him.
|
| Hilary Clinton | Politician |
Quoted from a 2012 speech regarding elites paying taxes. Her philanthropic causes with Bill Clinton received 'substan...
|
| David Pegg | Journalist |
The sender of the letter, from The Guardian newspaper.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Guardian | ||
| Clintons' philanthropic causes |
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
"One of the issues that I have been preaching about around the world is collecting taxes in an equitable manner — especially from the elites in every country."Source
"(For the avoidance of doubt, we do not normally regard any generalised assertion of “inaccuracies” as a substantive response; nor any generalised statement that the holders acted on advice. Neither will we regard as substantive any comment that only refers to the present state of affairs and not to the past.)"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,136 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document